Cargando…

The contribution of respiratory and hearing protection use to psychological distress in the workplace: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE: Workers from various industries use personal protective equipment (PPE) including masks, respirators, and hearing protection to reduce their exposures to workplace hazards. Many studies have evaluated the physiological impacts of PPE use, but few have assessed the psychological impacts. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leung, Richard, Cook, Margaret M., Capra, Mike F., Johnstone, Kelly R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9041289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01863-7
_version_ 1784694514770771968
author Leung, Richard
Cook, Margaret M.
Capra, Mike F.
Johnstone, Kelly R.
author_facet Leung, Richard
Cook, Margaret M.
Capra, Mike F.
Johnstone, Kelly R.
author_sort Leung, Richard
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Workers from various industries use personal protective equipment (PPE) including masks, respirators, and hearing protection to reduce their exposures to workplace hazards. Many studies have evaluated the physiological impacts of PPE use, but few have assessed the psychological impacts. The aim of the present study was to carry out a scoping review to compile existing evidence and determine the extent of knowledge on workplace mask, respirator or hearing protection use as a psychosocial hazard (stressor) that could result in a stress response and potentially lead to psychological injury. METHODS: The scoping review followed recognized methods and was conducted using Ovid Emcare, PubMed, Sage Journals, ScienceDirect, Scopus, SpringerLink, Google Scholar and preprint databases (OSF Preprints and medRxiv). Articles on the stressors associated with the use of masks, respirators, and hearing protection were included. The extracted data included author(s) name, year of publication, title of article, study design, population data, stressors assessed, and key findings. RESULTS: We retrieved 650 articles after removal of duplicates, of which 26 were deemed eligible for inclusion for review. Identified factors associated with PPE use that could potentially create a stress response were identified: communication impacts, physical impacts, psychological illness symptoms, cognitive impacts, and perceived PPE-related impacts. Evidence for respirators suggest that there may be psychological injury associated with their use. However, hearing protection appears to have a protective effect in reducing psychological symptoms such as anxiety, depression, and aggression. CONCLUSIONS: Mask or respirator use may lead to an increase in work-related stress. Whereas hearing protection may have protective effects against psychological symptoms and improves speech intelligibility. More research is needed to better understand potential psychosocial impacts of mask, respirator and/or hearing protection use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00420-022-01863-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9041289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90412892022-04-27 The contribution of respiratory and hearing protection use to psychological distress in the workplace: a scoping review Leung, Richard Cook, Margaret M. Capra, Mike F. Johnstone, Kelly R. Int Arch Occup Environ Health Review Article OBJECTIVE: Workers from various industries use personal protective equipment (PPE) including masks, respirators, and hearing protection to reduce their exposures to workplace hazards. Many studies have evaluated the physiological impacts of PPE use, but few have assessed the psychological impacts. The aim of the present study was to carry out a scoping review to compile existing evidence and determine the extent of knowledge on workplace mask, respirator or hearing protection use as a psychosocial hazard (stressor) that could result in a stress response and potentially lead to psychological injury. METHODS: The scoping review followed recognized methods and was conducted using Ovid Emcare, PubMed, Sage Journals, ScienceDirect, Scopus, SpringerLink, Google Scholar and preprint databases (OSF Preprints and medRxiv). Articles on the stressors associated with the use of masks, respirators, and hearing protection were included. The extracted data included author(s) name, year of publication, title of article, study design, population data, stressors assessed, and key findings. RESULTS: We retrieved 650 articles after removal of duplicates, of which 26 were deemed eligible for inclusion for review. Identified factors associated with PPE use that could potentially create a stress response were identified: communication impacts, physical impacts, psychological illness symptoms, cognitive impacts, and perceived PPE-related impacts. Evidence for respirators suggest that there may be psychological injury associated with their use. However, hearing protection appears to have a protective effect in reducing psychological symptoms such as anxiety, depression, and aggression. CONCLUSIONS: Mask or respirator use may lead to an increase in work-related stress. Whereas hearing protection may have protective effects against psychological symptoms and improves speech intelligibility. More research is needed to better understand potential psychosocial impacts of mask, respirator and/or hearing protection use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00420-022-01863-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-26 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9041289/ /pubmed/35474491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01863-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Leung, Richard
Cook, Margaret M.
Capra, Mike F.
Johnstone, Kelly R.
The contribution of respiratory and hearing protection use to psychological distress in the workplace: a scoping review
title The contribution of respiratory and hearing protection use to psychological distress in the workplace: a scoping review
title_full The contribution of respiratory and hearing protection use to psychological distress in the workplace: a scoping review
title_fullStr The contribution of respiratory and hearing protection use to psychological distress in the workplace: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed The contribution of respiratory and hearing protection use to psychological distress in the workplace: a scoping review
title_short The contribution of respiratory and hearing protection use to psychological distress in the workplace: a scoping review
title_sort contribution of respiratory and hearing protection use to psychological distress in the workplace: a scoping review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9041289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01863-7
work_keys_str_mv AT leungrichard thecontributionofrespiratoryandhearingprotectionusetopsychologicaldistressintheworkplaceascopingreview
AT cookmargaretm thecontributionofrespiratoryandhearingprotectionusetopsychologicaldistressintheworkplaceascopingreview
AT capramikef thecontributionofrespiratoryandhearingprotectionusetopsychologicaldistressintheworkplaceascopingreview
AT johnstonekellyr thecontributionofrespiratoryandhearingprotectionusetopsychologicaldistressintheworkplaceascopingreview
AT leungrichard contributionofrespiratoryandhearingprotectionusetopsychologicaldistressintheworkplaceascopingreview
AT cookmargaretm contributionofrespiratoryandhearingprotectionusetopsychologicaldistressintheworkplaceascopingreview
AT capramikef contributionofrespiratoryandhearingprotectionusetopsychologicaldistressintheworkplaceascopingreview
AT johnstonekellyr contributionofrespiratoryandhearingprotectionusetopsychologicaldistressintheworkplaceascopingreview