Cargando…

The Monte Carlo approach to model and predict the melting point of imidazolium ionic liquids using hybrid optimal descriptors

Ionic liquids (ILs) have captured intensive attention owing to their unique properties such as high thermal stability, negligible vapour pressure, high dissolution capacity and high ionic conductivity as well as their wide applications in various scientific fields including organic synthesis, cataly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lotfi, Shahram, Ahmadi, Shahin, Kumar, Parvin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9042335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35497322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra06861j
_version_ 1784694642819727360
author Lotfi, Shahram
Ahmadi, Shahin
Kumar, Parvin
author_facet Lotfi, Shahram
Ahmadi, Shahin
Kumar, Parvin
author_sort Lotfi, Shahram
collection PubMed
description Ionic liquids (ILs) have captured intensive attention owing to their unique properties such as high thermal stability, negligible vapour pressure, high dissolution capacity and high ionic conductivity as well as their wide applications in various scientific fields including organic synthesis, catalysis, and industrial extraction processes. Many applications of ionic liquids (ILs) rely on the melting point (T(m)). Therefore, in the present manuscript, the melting points of imidazolium ILs are studied employing a quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) approach to develop a model for predicting the melting points of a data set of imidazolium ILs. The Monte Carlo algorithm of CORAL software is applied to build up a robust QSPR model to calculate the values T(m) of 353 imidazolium ILs. Using a combination of SMILES and hydrogen-suppressed molecular graphs (HSGs), the hybrid optimal descriptor is computed and used to generate the QSPR models. Internal and external validation parameters are also employed to evaluate the predictability and reliability of the QSPR model. Four splits are prepared from the dataset and each split is randomly distributed into four sets i.e. training set (≈33%), invisible training set (≈31%), calibration set (≈16%) and validation set (≈20%). In QSPR modelling, the numerical values of various statistical features of the validation sets such as R(Validation)(2), Q(Validation)(2), and IIC(Validation) are found to be in the range of 0.7846–0.8535, 0.7687–0.8423 and 0.7424–0.8982, respectively. For mechanistic interpretation, the structural attributes which are responsible for the increase/decrease of T(m) are also extracted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9042335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90423352022-04-28 The Monte Carlo approach to model and predict the melting point of imidazolium ionic liquids using hybrid optimal descriptors Lotfi, Shahram Ahmadi, Shahin Kumar, Parvin RSC Adv Chemistry Ionic liquids (ILs) have captured intensive attention owing to their unique properties such as high thermal stability, negligible vapour pressure, high dissolution capacity and high ionic conductivity as well as their wide applications in various scientific fields including organic synthesis, catalysis, and industrial extraction processes. Many applications of ionic liquids (ILs) rely on the melting point (T(m)). Therefore, in the present manuscript, the melting points of imidazolium ILs are studied employing a quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) approach to develop a model for predicting the melting points of a data set of imidazolium ILs. The Monte Carlo algorithm of CORAL software is applied to build up a robust QSPR model to calculate the values T(m) of 353 imidazolium ILs. Using a combination of SMILES and hydrogen-suppressed molecular graphs (HSGs), the hybrid optimal descriptor is computed and used to generate the QSPR models. Internal and external validation parameters are also employed to evaluate the predictability and reliability of the QSPR model. Four splits are prepared from the dataset and each split is randomly distributed into four sets i.e. training set (≈33%), invisible training set (≈31%), calibration set (≈16%) and validation set (≈20%). In QSPR modelling, the numerical values of various statistical features of the validation sets such as R(Validation)(2), Q(Validation)(2), and IIC(Validation) are found to be in the range of 0.7846–0.8535, 0.7687–0.8423 and 0.7424–0.8982, respectively. For mechanistic interpretation, the structural attributes which are responsible for the increase/decrease of T(m) are also extracted. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9042335/ /pubmed/35497322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra06861j Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Lotfi, Shahram
Ahmadi, Shahin
Kumar, Parvin
The Monte Carlo approach to model and predict the melting point of imidazolium ionic liquids using hybrid optimal descriptors
title The Monte Carlo approach to model and predict the melting point of imidazolium ionic liquids using hybrid optimal descriptors
title_full The Monte Carlo approach to model and predict the melting point of imidazolium ionic liquids using hybrid optimal descriptors
title_fullStr The Monte Carlo approach to model and predict the melting point of imidazolium ionic liquids using hybrid optimal descriptors
title_full_unstemmed The Monte Carlo approach to model and predict the melting point of imidazolium ionic liquids using hybrid optimal descriptors
title_short The Monte Carlo approach to model and predict the melting point of imidazolium ionic liquids using hybrid optimal descriptors
title_sort monte carlo approach to model and predict the melting point of imidazolium ionic liquids using hybrid optimal descriptors
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9042335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35497322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra06861j
work_keys_str_mv AT lotfishahram themontecarloapproachtomodelandpredictthemeltingpointofimidazoliumionicliquidsusinghybridoptimaldescriptors
AT ahmadishahin themontecarloapproachtomodelandpredictthemeltingpointofimidazoliumionicliquidsusinghybridoptimaldescriptors
AT kumarparvin themontecarloapproachtomodelandpredictthemeltingpointofimidazoliumionicliquidsusinghybridoptimaldescriptors
AT lotfishahram montecarloapproachtomodelandpredictthemeltingpointofimidazoliumionicliquidsusinghybridoptimaldescriptors
AT ahmadishahin montecarloapproachtomodelandpredictthemeltingpointofimidazoliumionicliquidsusinghybridoptimaldescriptors
AT kumarparvin montecarloapproachtomodelandpredictthemeltingpointofimidazoliumionicliquidsusinghybridoptimaldescriptors