Cargando…
Bone Volumes and Trajectory Angles for Acetabular Anchor Placement Can Be Optimized
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal anchor placement and trajectory when repairing acetabular labral tears during hip arthroscopy with the primary focus on the 12 to 3 o’clock positions on the acetabular rim. METHODS: Three-dimensional computational models of the pelvis w...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9042773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35494283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.10.022 |
_version_ | 1784694738232803328 |
---|---|
author | Di Loreto, Rai Getgood, Alan Degen, Ryan Burkhart, Timothy A. |
author_facet | Di Loreto, Rai Getgood, Alan Degen, Ryan Burkhart, Timothy A. |
author_sort | Di Loreto, Rai |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal anchor placement and trajectory when repairing acetabular labral tears during hip arthroscopy with the primary focus on the 12 to 3 o’clock positions on the acetabular rim. METHODS: Three-dimensional computational models of the pelvis were generated from 13 cadaveric specimens using 3D slicer medical imaging software. A set of cones, consistent with the dimensions of a commonly used sutured anchor, were virtually embedded into the models at the 12, 1, 2, and 3 o’clock positions around the acetabulum. Mirror images of the cone were extended toward the superficial aspect of the hip. The volume of bone occupied by the virtual anchor, the trajectory angle, and the volume of overlap between adjacent anchor locations were calculated. RESULTS: Bone volume was significantly greater at the 1 o’clock position (4196.2 [1190.2] mm(3)) compared with all other positions (P < .001). The 3 o’clock position had the smallest volume (629.2 [180.0] mm(3)) and was also significantly less than the 12 (P < .001) and 2 o’clock (P = .014) positions). The trajectory angle of 32.04 [5.05]°) at the 1 o’clock position was significantly greater compared with all other positions (P < .001). The least amount of adjacent position overlap occurred between the 2 and 3 o’clock positions (.12 [.42] mm(3)), and this was statistically smaller than the overlap between cones at the 12 and 1 o’clock positions (214.28 [251.88] mm(3); P = .029) and the 1 and 2 o’clock positions (139.51 [177.14] mm(3); P = .044). CONCLUSIONS: Trajectory angles and the thickness of bone around the acetabulum were the greatest at the 12 to 1 o’clock positions, with the 1 o’clock position identified as that with the largest trajectory angle for safe anchor insertion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of a single, workhorse portal, for anchor insertion may not be recommended and careful selection of a portal allowing a direct approach should be used for anterior anchor insertion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9042773 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90427732022-04-28 Bone Volumes and Trajectory Angles for Acetabular Anchor Placement Can Be Optimized Di Loreto, Rai Getgood, Alan Degen, Ryan Burkhart, Timothy A. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal anchor placement and trajectory when repairing acetabular labral tears during hip arthroscopy with the primary focus on the 12 to 3 o’clock positions on the acetabular rim. METHODS: Three-dimensional computational models of the pelvis were generated from 13 cadaveric specimens using 3D slicer medical imaging software. A set of cones, consistent with the dimensions of a commonly used sutured anchor, were virtually embedded into the models at the 12, 1, 2, and 3 o’clock positions around the acetabulum. Mirror images of the cone were extended toward the superficial aspect of the hip. The volume of bone occupied by the virtual anchor, the trajectory angle, and the volume of overlap between adjacent anchor locations were calculated. RESULTS: Bone volume was significantly greater at the 1 o’clock position (4196.2 [1190.2] mm(3)) compared with all other positions (P < .001). The 3 o’clock position had the smallest volume (629.2 [180.0] mm(3)) and was also significantly less than the 12 (P < .001) and 2 o’clock (P = .014) positions). The trajectory angle of 32.04 [5.05]°) at the 1 o’clock position was significantly greater compared with all other positions (P < .001). The least amount of adjacent position overlap occurred between the 2 and 3 o’clock positions (.12 [.42] mm(3)), and this was statistically smaller than the overlap between cones at the 12 and 1 o’clock positions (214.28 [251.88] mm(3); P = .029) and the 1 and 2 o’clock positions (139.51 [177.14] mm(3); P = .044). CONCLUSIONS: Trajectory angles and the thickness of bone around the acetabulum were the greatest at the 12 to 1 o’clock positions, with the 1 o’clock position identified as that with the largest trajectory angle for safe anchor insertion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of a single, workhorse portal, for anchor insertion may not be recommended and careful selection of a portal allowing a direct approach should be used for anterior anchor insertion. Elsevier 2021-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9042773/ /pubmed/35494283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.10.022 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Di Loreto, Rai Getgood, Alan Degen, Ryan Burkhart, Timothy A. Bone Volumes and Trajectory Angles for Acetabular Anchor Placement Can Be Optimized |
title | Bone Volumes and Trajectory Angles for Acetabular Anchor Placement Can Be Optimized |
title_full | Bone Volumes and Trajectory Angles for Acetabular Anchor Placement Can Be Optimized |
title_fullStr | Bone Volumes and Trajectory Angles for Acetabular Anchor Placement Can Be Optimized |
title_full_unstemmed | Bone Volumes and Trajectory Angles for Acetabular Anchor Placement Can Be Optimized |
title_short | Bone Volumes and Trajectory Angles for Acetabular Anchor Placement Can Be Optimized |
title_sort | bone volumes and trajectory angles for acetabular anchor placement can be optimized |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9042773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35494283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.10.022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diloretorai bonevolumesandtrajectoryanglesforacetabularanchorplacementcanbeoptimized AT getgoodalan bonevolumesandtrajectoryanglesforacetabularanchorplacementcanbeoptimized AT degenryan bonevolumesandtrajectoryanglesforacetabularanchorplacementcanbeoptimized AT burkharttimothya bonevolumesandtrajectoryanglesforacetabularanchorplacementcanbeoptimized |