Cargando…
Comparison of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 papers
OBJECTIVE: The need to generate evidence related to COVID-19, the acceleration of publication and peer-review process and the competition between journals may have influenced the quality of COVID-19 papers. Our objective was to compare the characteristics of COVID-19 papers against those of non-COVI...
Autores principales: | Candal-Pedreira, Cristina, Ruano-Ravina, Alberto, Pérez-Ríos, Mónica |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SESPAS. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9042786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35584982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2022.03.006 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study
por: Candal-Pedreira, Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
COVID-19 Variability Within European Countries Sourced From ECDC Data. Is Variability Explained by Specific Country Policies?
por: Ruano-Ravina, Alberto, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Is lung cancer in never smokers still an unknown disease?
por: Candal-Pedreira, Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Escalas pronósticas de morbimortalidad por COVID-19: necesarias pero también fiables
por: Candal-Pedreira, Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Does retraction after misconduct have an impact on citations? A pre–post study
por: Candal-Pedreira, Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)