Cargando…
A preclinical radiotherapy dosimetry audit using a realistic 3D printed murine phantom
Preclinical radiation research lacks standardized dosimetry procedures that provide traceability to a primary standard. Consequently, ensuring accuracy and reproducibility between studies is challenging. Using 3D printed murine phantoms we undertook a dosimetry audit of Xstrahl Small Animal Radiatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9042835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10895-5 |
_version_ | 1784694753428766720 |
---|---|
author | Biglin, Emma R. Aitkenhead, Adam H. Price, Gareth J. Chadwick, Amy L. Santina, Elham Williams, Kaye J. Kirkby, Karen J. |
author_facet | Biglin, Emma R. Aitkenhead, Adam H. Price, Gareth J. Chadwick, Amy L. Santina, Elham Williams, Kaye J. Kirkby, Karen J. |
author_sort | Biglin, Emma R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Preclinical radiation research lacks standardized dosimetry procedures that provide traceability to a primary standard. Consequently, ensuring accuracy and reproducibility between studies is challenging. Using 3D printed murine phantoms we undertook a dosimetry audit of Xstrahl Small Animal Radiation Research Platforms (SARRPs) installed at 7 UK centres. The geometrically realistic phantom accommodated alanine pellets and Gafchromic EBT3 film for simultaneous measurement of the dose delivered and the dose distribution within a 2D plane, respectively. Two irradiation scenarios were developed: (1) a 10 × 10 mm(2) static field targeting the pelvis, and (2) a 5 × 5 mm(2) 90° arc targeting the brain. For static fields, the absolute difference between the planned dose and alanine measurement across all centres was 4.1 ± 4.3% (mean ± standard deviation), with an overall range of − 2.3 to 10.5%. For arc fields, the difference was − 1.2% ± 6.1%, with a range of − 13.1 to 7.7%. EBT3 dose measurements were greater than alanine by 2.0 ± 2.5% and 3.5 ± 6.0% (mean ± standard deviation) for the static and arc fields, respectively. 2D dose distributions showed discrepancies to the planned dose at the field edges. The audit demonstrates that further work on preclinical radiotherapy quality assurance processes is merited. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9042835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90428352022-04-27 A preclinical radiotherapy dosimetry audit using a realistic 3D printed murine phantom Biglin, Emma R. Aitkenhead, Adam H. Price, Gareth J. Chadwick, Amy L. Santina, Elham Williams, Kaye J. Kirkby, Karen J. Sci Rep Article Preclinical radiation research lacks standardized dosimetry procedures that provide traceability to a primary standard. Consequently, ensuring accuracy and reproducibility between studies is challenging. Using 3D printed murine phantoms we undertook a dosimetry audit of Xstrahl Small Animal Radiation Research Platforms (SARRPs) installed at 7 UK centres. The geometrically realistic phantom accommodated alanine pellets and Gafchromic EBT3 film for simultaneous measurement of the dose delivered and the dose distribution within a 2D plane, respectively. Two irradiation scenarios were developed: (1) a 10 × 10 mm(2) static field targeting the pelvis, and (2) a 5 × 5 mm(2) 90° arc targeting the brain. For static fields, the absolute difference between the planned dose and alanine measurement across all centres was 4.1 ± 4.3% (mean ± standard deviation), with an overall range of − 2.3 to 10.5%. For arc fields, the difference was − 1.2% ± 6.1%, with a range of − 13.1 to 7.7%. EBT3 dose measurements were greater than alanine by 2.0 ± 2.5% and 3.5 ± 6.0% (mean ± standard deviation) for the static and arc fields, respectively. 2D dose distributions showed discrepancies to the planned dose at the field edges. The audit demonstrates that further work on preclinical radiotherapy quality assurance processes is merited. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9042835/ /pubmed/35474242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10895-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Biglin, Emma R. Aitkenhead, Adam H. Price, Gareth J. Chadwick, Amy L. Santina, Elham Williams, Kaye J. Kirkby, Karen J. A preclinical radiotherapy dosimetry audit using a realistic 3D printed murine phantom |
title | A preclinical radiotherapy dosimetry audit using a realistic 3D printed murine phantom |
title_full | A preclinical radiotherapy dosimetry audit using a realistic 3D printed murine phantom |
title_fullStr | A preclinical radiotherapy dosimetry audit using a realistic 3D printed murine phantom |
title_full_unstemmed | A preclinical radiotherapy dosimetry audit using a realistic 3D printed murine phantom |
title_short | A preclinical radiotherapy dosimetry audit using a realistic 3D printed murine phantom |
title_sort | preclinical radiotherapy dosimetry audit using a realistic 3d printed murine phantom |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9042835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10895-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biglinemmar apreclinicalradiotherapydosimetryauditusingarealistic3dprintedmurinephantom AT aitkenheadadamh apreclinicalradiotherapydosimetryauditusingarealistic3dprintedmurinephantom AT pricegarethj apreclinicalradiotherapydosimetryauditusingarealistic3dprintedmurinephantom AT chadwickamyl apreclinicalradiotherapydosimetryauditusingarealistic3dprintedmurinephantom AT santinaelham apreclinicalradiotherapydosimetryauditusingarealistic3dprintedmurinephantom AT williamskayej apreclinicalradiotherapydosimetryauditusingarealistic3dprintedmurinephantom AT kirkbykarenj apreclinicalradiotherapydosimetryauditusingarealistic3dprintedmurinephantom AT biglinemmar preclinicalradiotherapydosimetryauditusingarealistic3dprintedmurinephantom AT aitkenheadadamh preclinicalradiotherapydosimetryauditusingarealistic3dprintedmurinephantom AT pricegarethj preclinicalradiotherapydosimetryauditusingarealistic3dprintedmurinephantom AT chadwickamyl preclinicalradiotherapydosimetryauditusingarealistic3dprintedmurinephantom AT santinaelham preclinicalradiotherapydosimetryauditusingarealistic3dprintedmurinephantom AT williamskayej preclinicalradiotherapydosimetryauditusingarealistic3dprintedmurinephantom AT kirkbykarenj preclinicalradiotherapydosimetryauditusingarealistic3dprintedmurinephantom |