Cargando…

Prospective evaluation of 92 serum protein biomarkers for early detection of ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND: CA125 is the best available yet insufficiently sensitive biomarker for early detection of ovarian cancer. There is a need to identify novel biomarkers, which individually or in combination with CA125 can achieve adequate sensitivity and specificity for the detection of earlier-stage ovar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mukama, Trasias, Fortner, Renée Turzanski, Katzke, Verena, Hynes, Lucas Cory, Petrera, Agnese, Hauck, Stefanie M., Johnson, Theron, Schulze, Matthias, Schiborn, Catarina, Rostgaard-Hansen, Agnetha Linn, Tjønneland, Anne, Overvad, Kim, Pérez, María José Sánchez, Crous-Bou, Marta, Chirlaque, María-Dolores, Amiano, Pilar, Ardanaz, Eva, Watts, Eleanor L., Travis, Ruth C., Sacerdote, Carlotta, Grioni, Sara, Masala, Giovanna, Signoriello, Simona, Tumino, Rosario, Gram, Inger T., Sandanger, Torkjel M., Sartor, Hanna, Lundin, Eva, Idahl, Annika, Heath, Alicia K., Dossus, Laure, Weiderpass, Elisabete, Kaaks, Rudolf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9042845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35031764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01697-z
_version_ 1784694755926474752
author Mukama, Trasias
Fortner, Renée Turzanski
Katzke, Verena
Hynes, Lucas Cory
Petrera, Agnese
Hauck, Stefanie M.
Johnson, Theron
Schulze, Matthias
Schiborn, Catarina
Rostgaard-Hansen, Agnetha Linn
Tjønneland, Anne
Overvad, Kim
Pérez, María José Sánchez
Crous-Bou, Marta
Chirlaque, María-Dolores
Amiano, Pilar
Ardanaz, Eva
Watts, Eleanor L.
Travis, Ruth C.
Sacerdote, Carlotta
Grioni, Sara
Masala, Giovanna
Signoriello, Simona
Tumino, Rosario
Gram, Inger T.
Sandanger, Torkjel M.
Sartor, Hanna
Lundin, Eva
Idahl, Annika
Heath, Alicia K.
Dossus, Laure
Weiderpass, Elisabete
Kaaks, Rudolf
author_facet Mukama, Trasias
Fortner, Renée Turzanski
Katzke, Verena
Hynes, Lucas Cory
Petrera, Agnese
Hauck, Stefanie M.
Johnson, Theron
Schulze, Matthias
Schiborn, Catarina
Rostgaard-Hansen, Agnetha Linn
Tjønneland, Anne
Overvad, Kim
Pérez, María José Sánchez
Crous-Bou, Marta
Chirlaque, María-Dolores
Amiano, Pilar
Ardanaz, Eva
Watts, Eleanor L.
Travis, Ruth C.
Sacerdote, Carlotta
Grioni, Sara
Masala, Giovanna
Signoriello, Simona
Tumino, Rosario
Gram, Inger T.
Sandanger, Torkjel M.
Sartor, Hanna
Lundin, Eva
Idahl, Annika
Heath, Alicia K.
Dossus, Laure
Weiderpass, Elisabete
Kaaks, Rudolf
author_sort Mukama, Trasias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: CA125 is the best available yet insufficiently sensitive biomarker for early detection of ovarian cancer. There is a need to identify novel biomarkers, which individually or in combination with CA125 can achieve adequate sensitivity and specificity for the detection of earlier-stage ovarian cancer. METHODS: In the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort, we measured serum levels of 92 preselected proteins for 91 women who had blood sampled ≤18 months prior to ovarian cancer diagnosis, and 182 matched controls. We evaluated the discriminatory performance of the proteins as potential early diagnostic biomarkers of ovarian cancer. RESULTS: Nine of the 92 markers; CA125, HE4, FOLR1, KLK11, WISP1, MDK, CXCL13, MSLN and ADAM8 showed an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of ≥0.70 for discriminating between women diagnosed with ovarian cancer and women who remained cancer-free. All, except ADAM8, had shown at least equal discrimination in previous case-control comparisons. The discrimination of the biomarkers, however, was low for the lag-time of >9–18 months and paired combinations of CA125 with any of the 8 markers did not improve discrimination compared to CA125 alone. CONCLUSION: Using pre-diagnostic serum samples, this study identified markers with good discrimination for the lag-time of 0–9 months. However, the discrimination was low in blood samples collected more than 9 months prior to diagnosis, and none of the markers showed major improvement in discrimination when added to CA125.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9042845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90428452022-04-28 Prospective evaluation of 92 serum protein biomarkers for early detection of ovarian cancer Mukama, Trasias Fortner, Renée Turzanski Katzke, Verena Hynes, Lucas Cory Petrera, Agnese Hauck, Stefanie M. Johnson, Theron Schulze, Matthias Schiborn, Catarina Rostgaard-Hansen, Agnetha Linn Tjønneland, Anne Overvad, Kim Pérez, María José Sánchez Crous-Bou, Marta Chirlaque, María-Dolores Amiano, Pilar Ardanaz, Eva Watts, Eleanor L. Travis, Ruth C. Sacerdote, Carlotta Grioni, Sara Masala, Giovanna Signoriello, Simona Tumino, Rosario Gram, Inger T. Sandanger, Torkjel M. Sartor, Hanna Lundin, Eva Idahl, Annika Heath, Alicia K. Dossus, Laure Weiderpass, Elisabete Kaaks, Rudolf Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: CA125 is the best available yet insufficiently sensitive biomarker for early detection of ovarian cancer. There is a need to identify novel biomarkers, which individually or in combination with CA125 can achieve adequate sensitivity and specificity for the detection of earlier-stage ovarian cancer. METHODS: In the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort, we measured serum levels of 92 preselected proteins for 91 women who had blood sampled ≤18 months prior to ovarian cancer diagnosis, and 182 matched controls. We evaluated the discriminatory performance of the proteins as potential early diagnostic biomarkers of ovarian cancer. RESULTS: Nine of the 92 markers; CA125, HE4, FOLR1, KLK11, WISP1, MDK, CXCL13, MSLN and ADAM8 showed an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of ≥0.70 for discriminating between women diagnosed with ovarian cancer and women who remained cancer-free. All, except ADAM8, had shown at least equal discrimination in previous case-control comparisons. The discrimination of the biomarkers, however, was low for the lag-time of >9–18 months and paired combinations of CA125 with any of the 8 markers did not improve discrimination compared to CA125 alone. CONCLUSION: Using pre-diagnostic serum samples, this study identified markers with good discrimination for the lag-time of 0–9 months. However, the discrimination was low in blood samples collected more than 9 months prior to diagnosis, and none of the markers showed major improvement in discrimination when added to CA125. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-01-14 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9042845/ /pubmed/35031764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01697-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Mukama, Trasias
Fortner, Renée Turzanski
Katzke, Verena
Hynes, Lucas Cory
Petrera, Agnese
Hauck, Stefanie M.
Johnson, Theron
Schulze, Matthias
Schiborn, Catarina
Rostgaard-Hansen, Agnetha Linn
Tjønneland, Anne
Overvad, Kim
Pérez, María José Sánchez
Crous-Bou, Marta
Chirlaque, María-Dolores
Amiano, Pilar
Ardanaz, Eva
Watts, Eleanor L.
Travis, Ruth C.
Sacerdote, Carlotta
Grioni, Sara
Masala, Giovanna
Signoriello, Simona
Tumino, Rosario
Gram, Inger T.
Sandanger, Torkjel M.
Sartor, Hanna
Lundin, Eva
Idahl, Annika
Heath, Alicia K.
Dossus, Laure
Weiderpass, Elisabete
Kaaks, Rudolf
Prospective evaluation of 92 serum protein biomarkers for early detection of ovarian cancer
title Prospective evaluation of 92 serum protein biomarkers for early detection of ovarian cancer
title_full Prospective evaluation of 92 serum protein biomarkers for early detection of ovarian cancer
title_fullStr Prospective evaluation of 92 serum protein biomarkers for early detection of ovarian cancer
title_full_unstemmed Prospective evaluation of 92 serum protein biomarkers for early detection of ovarian cancer
title_short Prospective evaluation of 92 serum protein biomarkers for early detection of ovarian cancer
title_sort prospective evaluation of 92 serum protein biomarkers for early detection of ovarian cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9042845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35031764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01697-z
work_keys_str_mv AT mukamatrasias prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT fortnerreneeturzanski prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT katzkeverena prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT hyneslucascory prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT petreraagnese prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT hauckstefaniem prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT johnsontheron prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT schulzematthias prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT schiborncatarina prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT rostgaardhansenagnethalinn prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT tjønnelandanne prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT overvadkim prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT perezmariajosesanchez prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT crousboumarta prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT chirlaquemariadolores prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT amianopilar prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT ardanazeva prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT wattseleanorl prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT travisruthc prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT sacerdotecarlotta prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT grionisara prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT masalagiovanna prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT signoriellosimona prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT tuminorosario prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT gramingert prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT sandangertorkjelm prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT sartorhanna prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT lundineva prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT idahlannika prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT heathaliciak prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT dossuslaure prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT weiderpasselisabete prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer
AT kaaksrudolf prospectiveevaluationof92serumproteinbiomarkersforearlydetectionofovariancancer