Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of romosozumab for the treatment of postmenopausal women at very high risk of fracture in Canada

SUMMARY: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of 1 year of romosozumab followed by alendronate versus oral bisphosphonates alone in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis at very high risk for fracture in Canada. Results showed that romosozumab sequenced to alendronate is a cost-effective tre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goeree, Ron, Burke, Natasha, Jobin, Manon, Brown, Jacques P., Lawrence, Donna, Stollenwerk, Björn, Willems, Damon, Johnson, Ben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9042964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35471711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01106-9
_version_ 1784694783508217856
author Goeree, Ron
Burke, Natasha
Jobin, Manon
Brown, Jacques P.
Lawrence, Donna
Stollenwerk, Björn
Willems, Damon
Johnson, Ben
author_facet Goeree, Ron
Burke, Natasha
Jobin, Manon
Brown, Jacques P.
Lawrence, Donna
Stollenwerk, Björn
Willems, Damon
Johnson, Ben
author_sort Goeree, Ron
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of 1 year of romosozumab followed by alendronate versus oral bisphosphonates alone in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis at very high risk for fracture in Canada. Results showed that romosozumab sequenced to alendronate is a cost-effective treatment option, dominating both alendronate and risedronate alone. PURPOSE: To demonstrate the value of romosozumab sequenced to alendronate compared to alendronate or risedronate alone, for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with a history of osteoporotic fracture and who are at very high risk for future fracture in Canada. METHODS: A Markov model followed a hypothetical cohort of postmenopausal osteoporotic women at very high risk for future fractures, to estimate the cost-effectiveness of romosozumab and alendronate compared to oral bisphosphonates alone. A total treatment period of 5 years was assumed. Quality-adjusted life years and costs were estimated for each comparator across health states defined by different types of fragility fractures. RESULTS: Romosozumab/alendronate was associated with a lifetime gain of 0.103 and 0.127 QALYs and a cost reduction of $343 and $3805, relative to alendronate and risedronate, respectively. These results were driven by a reduction of the number of fractures (2561 per 1000 patients, versus 2700 for alendronate and 2724 for risedronate over lifetime). Romosozumab/alendronate had the highest probability of being cost-effective, relative to alendronate and risedronate, at any willingness to pay threshold value. CONCLUSION: Romosozumab/alendronate was associated with reduced costs and greater benefit relative to other comparators. Probabilistic, deterministic, and scenario analyses indicate that romosozumab/alendronate represents the best value for money; the uncertainty analyses are robust, and therefore romosozumab should be considered for reimbursement by public drug plans in Canada .
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9042964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90429642022-05-07 Cost-effectiveness of romosozumab for the treatment of postmenopausal women at very high risk of fracture in Canada Goeree, Ron Burke, Natasha Jobin, Manon Brown, Jacques P. Lawrence, Donna Stollenwerk, Björn Willems, Damon Johnson, Ben Arch Osteoporos Original Article SUMMARY: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of 1 year of romosozumab followed by alendronate versus oral bisphosphonates alone in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis at very high risk for fracture in Canada. Results showed that romosozumab sequenced to alendronate is a cost-effective treatment option, dominating both alendronate and risedronate alone. PURPOSE: To demonstrate the value of romosozumab sequenced to alendronate compared to alendronate or risedronate alone, for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with a history of osteoporotic fracture and who are at very high risk for future fracture in Canada. METHODS: A Markov model followed a hypothetical cohort of postmenopausal osteoporotic women at very high risk for future fractures, to estimate the cost-effectiveness of romosozumab and alendronate compared to oral bisphosphonates alone. A total treatment period of 5 years was assumed. Quality-adjusted life years and costs were estimated for each comparator across health states defined by different types of fragility fractures. RESULTS: Romosozumab/alendronate was associated with a lifetime gain of 0.103 and 0.127 QALYs and a cost reduction of $343 and $3805, relative to alendronate and risedronate, respectively. These results were driven by a reduction of the number of fractures (2561 per 1000 patients, versus 2700 for alendronate and 2724 for risedronate over lifetime). Romosozumab/alendronate had the highest probability of being cost-effective, relative to alendronate and risedronate, at any willingness to pay threshold value. CONCLUSION: Romosozumab/alendronate was associated with reduced costs and greater benefit relative to other comparators. Probabilistic, deterministic, and scenario analyses indicate that romosozumab/alendronate represents the best value for money; the uncertainty analyses are robust, and therefore romosozumab should be considered for reimbursement by public drug plans in Canada . Springer London 2022-04-26 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9042964/ /pubmed/35471711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01106-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Goeree, Ron
Burke, Natasha
Jobin, Manon
Brown, Jacques P.
Lawrence, Donna
Stollenwerk, Björn
Willems, Damon
Johnson, Ben
Cost-effectiveness of romosozumab for the treatment of postmenopausal women at very high risk of fracture in Canada
title Cost-effectiveness of romosozumab for the treatment of postmenopausal women at very high risk of fracture in Canada
title_full Cost-effectiveness of romosozumab for the treatment of postmenopausal women at very high risk of fracture in Canada
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of romosozumab for the treatment of postmenopausal women at very high risk of fracture in Canada
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of romosozumab for the treatment of postmenopausal women at very high risk of fracture in Canada
title_short Cost-effectiveness of romosozumab for the treatment of postmenopausal women at very high risk of fracture in Canada
title_sort cost-effectiveness of romosozumab for the treatment of postmenopausal women at very high risk of fracture in canada
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9042964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35471711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01106-9
work_keys_str_mv AT goereeron costeffectivenessofromosozumabforthetreatmentofpostmenopausalwomenatveryhighriskoffractureincanada
AT burkenatasha costeffectivenessofromosozumabforthetreatmentofpostmenopausalwomenatveryhighriskoffractureincanada
AT jobinmanon costeffectivenessofromosozumabforthetreatmentofpostmenopausalwomenatveryhighriskoffractureincanada
AT brownjacquesp costeffectivenessofromosozumabforthetreatmentofpostmenopausalwomenatveryhighriskoffractureincanada
AT lawrencedonna costeffectivenessofromosozumabforthetreatmentofpostmenopausalwomenatveryhighriskoffractureincanada
AT stollenwerkbjorn costeffectivenessofromosozumabforthetreatmentofpostmenopausalwomenatveryhighriskoffractureincanada
AT willemsdamon costeffectivenessofromosozumabforthetreatmentofpostmenopausalwomenatveryhighriskoffractureincanada
AT johnsonben costeffectivenessofromosozumabforthetreatmentofpostmenopausalwomenatveryhighriskoffractureincanada