Cargando…

Formulation of the Menu of a General Hospital After Its Conversion to a “COVID Hospital”: A Nutrient Analysis of 28-Day Menus

AIM: The aim of the present study was to modify the hospital menu to increase energy and protein provision in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: After the conversion of our hospital to a COVID-19 hospital, eggs, and comfort foods such as vanilla pudding were added to the menu to boost energy and protein in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Detopoulou, Paraskevi, Al-Khelefawi, Zena Hardan, Kalonarchi, Garifallia, Papamikos, Vasilios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9043649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35495923
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.833628
_version_ 1784694928772694016
author Detopoulou, Paraskevi
Al-Khelefawi, Zena Hardan
Kalonarchi, Garifallia
Papamikos, Vasilios
author_facet Detopoulou, Paraskevi
Al-Khelefawi, Zena Hardan
Kalonarchi, Garifallia
Papamikos, Vasilios
author_sort Detopoulou, Paraskevi
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of the present study was to modify the hospital menu to increase energy and protein provision in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: After the conversion of our hospital to a COVID-19 hospital, eggs, and comfort foods such as vanilla pudding were added to the menu to boost energy and protein intake of patients. All meals of the standard menu of the hospital, i.e., breakfast, lunch, and dinner were recorded for 14 consecutive days during two periods: pre-COVID-19 and after being converted to a “COVID hospital.” The menus were analyzed with the use of the USDA database. RESULTS: The total content of energy (1,873 ± 87 vs. 2,489 ± 137 Kcal), protein (97 ± 11 vs. 126.4 ± 18.7 g), fat (55 ± 9 vs. 74.1 ± 12.8 g), and carbohydrate (241.0 ± 16.0 vs. 323.0 ± 16.0 g) of the provided menus was increased in the COVID-19 period compared to the pre-COVID period. The leucine provision was also increased (4.8 ± 1.08 vs. 7.2 ± 1.3 g). Changes in protein and leucine were greater for breakfast (10 vs. 21 g protein and 0.8 vs. 1.7 g of leucine). The menu during COVID-29 provided more vitamin C (69.5 vs. 109.4 mg), thiamine (1.5 vs. 1.6 mg), riboflavin (2.1 vs. 2.6 mg), niacin (20.6 vs. 27.2 mg), pantothenic Acid (5.7 vs. 7.9 mg), vitamin B6 (2 vs. 2.6 mg), folate (274 vs. 334 μg), B(12) (4.8 vs. 6.2 μg), choline (296 vs. 458 mg) as well as vitamins A (8,564 vs. 21,258 IU), D (3.9 vs. 4.7 μg), and K (59.3-111.5 μg). As far as micronutrients are concerned, the provisions of calcium (972 vs. 1375 mg), iron (10.2-12.8 mg), magnesium (236 vs. 294 mg), phosphorus (1,325 vs. 1,807 mg), copper (1.0 vs. 1.3 mg), manganese (2.1 vs. 2.4 mg) and selenium (148 vs. 183 μg) were increased during the COVID-19 period. CONCLUSION: Simple menu changes and addition of comfort foods can substantially boost the nutrient content of a hospital diet, which in concert with provision of oral nutritional supplements could have an impact on patients’ nutritional status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9043649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90436492022-04-28 Formulation of the Menu of a General Hospital After Its Conversion to a “COVID Hospital”: A Nutrient Analysis of 28-Day Menus Detopoulou, Paraskevi Al-Khelefawi, Zena Hardan Kalonarchi, Garifallia Papamikos, Vasilios Front Nutr Nutrition AIM: The aim of the present study was to modify the hospital menu to increase energy and protein provision in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: After the conversion of our hospital to a COVID-19 hospital, eggs, and comfort foods such as vanilla pudding were added to the menu to boost energy and protein intake of patients. All meals of the standard menu of the hospital, i.e., breakfast, lunch, and dinner were recorded for 14 consecutive days during two periods: pre-COVID-19 and after being converted to a “COVID hospital.” The menus were analyzed with the use of the USDA database. RESULTS: The total content of energy (1,873 ± 87 vs. 2,489 ± 137 Kcal), protein (97 ± 11 vs. 126.4 ± 18.7 g), fat (55 ± 9 vs. 74.1 ± 12.8 g), and carbohydrate (241.0 ± 16.0 vs. 323.0 ± 16.0 g) of the provided menus was increased in the COVID-19 period compared to the pre-COVID period. The leucine provision was also increased (4.8 ± 1.08 vs. 7.2 ± 1.3 g). Changes in protein and leucine were greater for breakfast (10 vs. 21 g protein and 0.8 vs. 1.7 g of leucine). The menu during COVID-29 provided more vitamin C (69.5 vs. 109.4 mg), thiamine (1.5 vs. 1.6 mg), riboflavin (2.1 vs. 2.6 mg), niacin (20.6 vs. 27.2 mg), pantothenic Acid (5.7 vs. 7.9 mg), vitamin B6 (2 vs. 2.6 mg), folate (274 vs. 334 μg), B(12) (4.8 vs. 6.2 μg), choline (296 vs. 458 mg) as well as vitamins A (8,564 vs. 21,258 IU), D (3.9 vs. 4.7 μg), and K (59.3-111.5 μg). As far as micronutrients are concerned, the provisions of calcium (972 vs. 1375 mg), iron (10.2-12.8 mg), magnesium (236 vs. 294 mg), phosphorus (1,325 vs. 1,807 mg), copper (1.0 vs. 1.3 mg), manganese (2.1 vs. 2.4 mg) and selenium (148 vs. 183 μg) were increased during the COVID-19 period. CONCLUSION: Simple menu changes and addition of comfort foods can substantially boost the nutrient content of a hospital diet, which in concert with provision of oral nutritional supplements could have an impact on patients’ nutritional status. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9043649/ /pubmed/35495923 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.833628 Text en Copyright © 2022 Detopoulou, Al-Khelefawi, Kalonarchi and Papamikos. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Detopoulou, Paraskevi
Al-Khelefawi, Zena Hardan
Kalonarchi, Garifallia
Papamikos, Vasilios
Formulation of the Menu of a General Hospital After Its Conversion to a “COVID Hospital”: A Nutrient Analysis of 28-Day Menus
title Formulation of the Menu of a General Hospital After Its Conversion to a “COVID Hospital”: A Nutrient Analysis of 28-Day Menus
title_full Formulation of the Menu of a General Hospital After Its Conversion to a “COVID Hospital”: A Nutrient Analysis of 28-Day Menus
title_fullStr Formulation of the Menu of a General Hospital After Its Conversion to a “COVID Hospital”: A Nutrient Analysis of 28-Day Menus
title_full_unstemmed Formulation of the Menu of a General Hospital After Its Conversion to a “COVID Hospital”: A Nutrient Analysis of 28-Day Menus
title_short Formulation of the Menu of a General Hospital After Its Conversion to a “COVID Hospital”: A Nutrient Analysis of 28-Day Menus
title_sort formulation of the menu of a general hospital after its conversion to a “covid hospital”: a nutrient analysis of 28-day menus
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9043649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35495923
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.833628
work_keys_str_mv AT detopoulouparaskevi formulationofthemenuofageneralhospitalafteritsconversiontoacovidhospitalanutrientanalysisof28daymenus
AT alkhelefawizenahardan formulationofthemenuofageneralhospitalafteritsconversiontoacovidhospitalanutrientanalysisof28daymenus
AT kalonarchigarifallia formulationofthemenuofageneralhospitalafteritsconversiontoacovidhospitalanutrientanalysisof28daymenus
AT papamikosvasilios formulationofthemenuofageneralhospitalafteritsconversiontoacovidhospitalanutrientanalysisof28daymenus