Cargando…

Conditioning intensity and probability of live birth after blood or marrow transplantation, a BMTSS report

We examine the impact of conditioning intensity (low intensity: nonmyeloablative/reduced intensity vs high intensity: myeloablative) and total body irradiation (TBI) on the probability of live birth after blood or marrow transplantation (BMT). Study participants were drawn from the BMT Survivor Stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balas, Nora, Hageman, Lindsey, Wu, Jessica, Francisco, Liton, Schlichting, Elizabeth, Bosworth, Alysia, Te, Hok Sreng, Wong, F. Lennie, Landier, Wendy, Salzman, Donna, Weisdorf, Daniel J., Forman, Stephen J., Arora, Mukta, Armenian, Saro H., Bhatia, Smita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Hematology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9043940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34933332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006300
_version_ 1784694995980124160
author Balas, Nora
Hageman, Lindsey
Wu, Jessica
Francisco, Liton
Schlichting, Elizabeth
Bosworth, Alysia
Te, Hok Sreng
Wong, F. Lennie
Landier, Wendy
Salzman, Donna
Weisdorf, Daniel J.
Forman, Stephen J.
Arora, Mukta
Armenian, Saro H.
Bhatia, Smita
author_facet Balas, Nora
Hageman, Lindsey
Wu, Jessica
Francisco, Liton
Schlichting, Elizabeth
Bosworth, Alysia
Te, Hok Sreng
Wong, F. Lennie
Landier, Wendy
Salzman, Donna
Weisdorf, Daniel J.
Forman, Stephen J.
Arora, Mukta
Armenian, Saro H.
Bhatia, Smita
author_sort Balas, Nora
collection PubMed
description We examine the impact of conditioning intensity (low intensity: nonmyeloablative/reduced intensity vs high intensity: myeloablative) and total body irradiation (TBI) on the probability of live birth after blood or marrow transplantation (BMT). Study participants were drawn from the BMT Survivor Study (BMTSS) and included 1607 transplant survivors between 1974 and 2014 at age ≤45 years, with survival ≥2 years post-BMT and age at study ≥18 years. Closest-age, same-sex biologic siblings (n = 172) were 1:1 matched with 172 survivors. Survivors and siblings self-reported information on sociodemographic, chronic health conditions, and pregnancies. Within survivor analysis: the association between the primary exposure variable (no TBI/low-intensity conditioning; 200 to 800 cGy TBI/low-intensity conditioning; no TBI/high-intensity conditioning; >800 cGy TBI/high-intensity conditioning) and the odds of no post-BMT live birth were examined using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for clinical and demographic variables. Median age at BMT was 31 years (IQR, 0 to 45), and median length of follow-up was 14.3 years (IQR, 2.4 to 41.4); 39.3% were autologous BMT recipients, and 46.6% were female. Overall, 120 (8.7%) survivors reported post-BMT live births. Receipt of >800 cGy TBI/high-intensity conditioning (odds ratio [OR], 3.7; 95% CI, 1.9-7.0; ref: no TBI/low-intensity conditioning) was associated with higher odds of reporting no live birth post-BMT. In contrast, 200 to 800 cGy TBI/low-intensity conditioning (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.5-3.3), and no TBI/high-intensity conditioning (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.5-1.7) were at similar risk of reporting post-BMT live birth as no TBI/low-intensity conditioning. Comparison with biologic siblings: Using conditional logistic regression, we found that BMT survivors were more likely to report no live birth (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.3) compared with siblings. These findings could inform conditioning intensity options for patients wishing to preserve fertility post-BMT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9043940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90439402022-04-28 Conditioning intensity and probability of live birth after blood or marrow transplantation, a BMTSS report Balas, Nora Hageman, Lindsey Wu, Jessica Francisco, Liton Schlichting, Elizabeth Bosworth, Alysia Te, Hok Sreng Wong, F. Lennie Landier, Wendy Salzman, Donna Weisdorf, Daniel J. Forman, Stephen J. Arora, Mukta Armenian, Saro H. Bhatia, Smita Blood Adv Transplantation We examine the impact of conditioning intensity (low intensity: nonmyeloablative/reduced intensity vs high intensity: myeloablative) and total body irradiation (TBI) on the probability of live birth after blood or marrow transplantation (BMT). Study participants were drawn from the BMT Survivor Study (BMTSS) and included 1607 transplant survivors between 1974 and 2014 at age ≤45 years, with survival ≥2 years post-BMT and age at study ≥18 years. Closest-age, same-sex biologic siblings (n = 172) were 1:1 matched with 172 survivors. Survivors and siblings self-reported information on sociodemographic, chronic health conditions, and pregnancies. Within survivor analysis: the association between the primary exposure variable (no TBI/low-intensity conditioning; 200 to 800 cGy TBI/low-intensity conditioning; no TBI/high-intensity conditioning; >800 cGy TBI/high-intensity conditioning) and the odds of no post-BMT live birth were examined using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for clinical and demographic variables. Median age at BMT was 31 years (IQR, 0 to 45), and median length of follow-up was 14.3 years (IQR, 2.4 to 41.4); 39.3% were autologous BMT recipients, and 46.6% were female. Overall, 120 (8.7%) survivors reported post-BMT live births. Receipt of >800 cGy TBI/high-intensity conditioning (odds ratio [OR], 3.7; 95% CI, 1.9-7.0; ref: no TBI/low-intensity conditioning) was associated with higher odds of reporting no live birth post-BMT. In contrast, 200 to 800 cGy TBI/low-intensity conditioning (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.5-3.3), and no TBI/high-intensity conditioning (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.5-1.7) were at similar risk of reporting post-BMT live birth as no TBI/low-intensity conditioning. Comparison with biologic siblings: Using conditional logistic regression, we found that BMT survivors were more likely to report no live birth (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.3) compared with siblings. These findings could inform conditioning intensity options for patients wishing to preserve fertility post-BMT. American Society of Hematology 2022-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9043940/ /pubmed/34933332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006300 Text en © 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.
spellingShingle Transplantation
Balas, Nora
Hageman, Lindsey
Wu, Jessica
Francisco, Liton
Schlichting, Elizabeth
Bosworth, Alysia
Te, Hok Sreng
Wong, F. Lennie
Landier, Wendy
Salzman, Donna
Weisdorf, Daniel J.
Forman, Stephen J.
Arora, Mukta
Armenian, Saro H.
Bhatia, Smita
Conditioning intensity and probability of live birth after blood or marrow transplantation, a BMTSS report
title Conditioning intensity and probability of live birth after blood or marrow transplantation, a BMTSS report
title_full Conditioning intensity and probability of live birth after blood or marrow transplantation, a BMTSS report
title_fullStr Conditioning intensity and probability of live birth after blood or marrow transplantation, a BMTSS report
title_full_unstemmed Conditioning intensity and probability of live birth after blood or marrow transplantation, a BMTSS report
title_short Conditioning intensity and probability of live birth after blood or marrow transplantation, a BMTSS report
title_sort conditioning intensity and probability of live birth after blood or marrow transplantation, a bmtss report
topic Transplantation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9043940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34933332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006300
work_keys_str_mv AT balasnora conditioningintensityandprobabilityoflivebirthafterbloodormarrowtransplantationabmtssreport
AT hagemanlindsey conditioningintensityandprobabilityoflivebirthafterbloodormarrowtransplantationabmtssreport
AT wujessica conditioningintensityandprobabilityoflivebirthafterbloodormarrowtransplantationabmtssreport
AT franciscoliton conditioningintensityandprobabilityoflivebirthafterbloodormarrowtransplantationabmtssreport
AT schlichtingelizabeth conditioningintensityandprobabilityoflivebirthafterbloodormarrowtransplantationabmtssreport
AT bosworthalysia conditioningintensityandprobabilityoflivebirthafterbloodormarrowtransplantationabmtssreport
AT tehoksreng conditioningintensityandprobabilityoflivebirthafterbloodormarrowtransplantationabmtssreport
AT wongflennie conditioningintensityandprobabilityoflivebirthafterbloodormarrowtransplantationabmtssreport
AT landierwendy conditioningintensityandprobabilityoflivebirthafterbloodormarrowtransplantationabmtssreport
AT salzmandonna conditioningintensityandprobabilityoflivebirthafterbloodormarrowtransplantationabmtssreport
AT weisdorfdanielj conditioningintensityandprobabilityoflivebirthafterbloodormarrowtransplantationabmtssreport
AT formanstephenj conditioningintensityandprobabilityoflivebirthafterbloodormarrowtransplantationabmtssreport
AT aroramukta conditioningintensityandprobabilityoflivebirthafterbloodormarrowtransplantationabmtssreport
AT armeniansaroh conditioningintensityandprobabilityoflivebirthafterbloodormarrowtransplantationabmtssreport
AT bhatiasmita conditioningintensityandprobabilityoflivebirthafterbloodormarrowtransplantationabmtssreport