Cargando…

Which fraction of stone wool fibre surface remains uncoated by binder? A detailed analysis by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Biodurability of man-made vitreous fibres (MMVF) is often measured on naked fibres, i.e. fibres devoid of the phenol-urea-formaldehyde (PUF) binder that is sprayed and baked on the commercial product to reduce dustiness and to provide mechanical strength to fibre mats. This simplification of the haz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirth, Sabine, Waindok, Hubert, Wohlleben, Wendel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9044424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35492464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra06251d
_version_ 1784695102079238144
author Hirth, Sabine
Waindok, Hubert
Wohlleben, Wendel
author_facet Hirth, Sabine
Waindok, Hubert
Wohlleben, Wendel
author_sort Hirth, Sabine
collection PubMed
description Biodurability of man-made vitreous fibres (MMVF) is often measured on naked fibres, i.e. fibres devoid of the phenol-urea-formaldehyde (PUF) binder that is sprayed and baked on the commercial product to reduce dustiness and to provide mechanical strength to fibre mats. This simplification of the hazard assessment relies on the assumption that the binder would not actually coat the entire fibre surface, but would occur only at the touching points where two fibres are glued together. We challenged this assumption by using surface analysis by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS). We analysed commercial stone wool MMVF sourced from Denmark, United Kingdom and Germany. XPS as well as ToF-SIMS-mapping combined with gas-cluster-ion-sputtering revealed that all mineral fibres investigated show a complete layer of organics over the surface of the fibres with only a few defects: before sputtering, organic components (PUF binder and oils) uniformly cover the spatial structures; only after sputtering, the inorganic components of the stone wool emerge on the visible surfaces. A preferential localisation of PUF binder on fibre-to-fibre touching points or as droplets was not observable. We finally explored the correlation to dissolution rates, but found that total PUF binder content and the experimentally determined thickness of the PUF binder layer are not sufficient to predict dissolution rates, which instead must consider chemical composition and other properties. In summary, none of the investigated stone wool fibre surfaces were uncoated by the PUF binder.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9044424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90444242022-04-28 Which fraction of stone wool fibre surface remains uncoated by binder? A detailed analysis by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy Hirth, Sabine Waindok, Hubert Wohlleben, Wendel RSC Adv Chemistry Biodurability of man-made vitreous fibres (MMVF) is often measured on naked fibres, i.e. fibres devoid of the phenol-urea-formaldehyde (PUF) binder that is sprayed and baked on the commercial product to reduce dustiness and to provide mechanical strength to fibre mats. This simplification of the hazard assessment relies on the assumption that the binder would not actually coat the entire fibre surface, but would occur only at the touching points where two fibres are glued together. We challenged this assumption by using surface analysis by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS). We analysed commercial stone wool MMVF sourced from Denmark, United Kingdom and Germany. XPS as well as ToF-SIMS-mapping combined with gas-cluster-ion-sputtering revealed that all mineral fibres investigated show a complete layer of organics over the surface of the fibres with only a few defects: before sputtering, organic components (PUF binder and oils) uniformly cover the spatial structures; only after sputtering, the inorganic components of the stone wool emerge on the visible surfaces. A preferential localisation of PUF binder on fibre-to-fibre touching points or as droplets was not observable. We finally explored the correlation to dissolution rates, but found that total PUF binder content and the experimentally determined thickness of the PUF binder layer are not sufficient to predict dissolution rates, which instead must consider chemical composition and other properties. In summary, none of the investigated stone wool fibre surfaces were uncoated by the PUF binder. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9044424/ /pubmed/35492464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra06251d Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Hirth, Sabine
Waindok, Hubert
Wohlleben, Wendel
Which fraction of stone wool fibre surface remains uncoated by binder? A detailed analysis by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
title Which fraction of stone wool fibre surface remains uncoated by binder? A detailed analysis by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
title_full Which fraction of stone wool fibre surface remains uncoated by binder? A detailed analysis by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
title_fullStr Which fraction of stone wool fibre surface remains uncoated by binder? A detailed analysis by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
title_full_unstemmed Which fraction of stone wool fibre surface remains uncoated by binder? A detailed analysis by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
title_short Which fraction of stone wool fibre surface remains uncoated by binder? A detailed analysis by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
title_sort which fraction of stone wool fibre surface remains uncoated by binder? a detailed analysis by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9044424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35492464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ra06251d
work_keys_str_mv AT hirthsabine whichfractionofstonewoolfibresurfaceremainsuncoatedbybinderadetailedanalysisbytimeofflightsecondaryionmassspectrometryandxrayphotoelectronspectroscopy
AT waindokhubert whichfractionofstonewoolfibresurfaceremainsuncoatedbybinderadetailedanalysisbytimeofflightsecondaryionmassspectrometryandxrayphotoelectronspectroscopy
AT wohllebenwendel whichfractionofstonewoolfibresurfaceremainsuncoatedbybinderadetailedanalysisbytimeofflightsecondaryionmassspectrometryandxrayphotoelectronspectroscopy