Cargando…

Bone quality effect on short implants in the edentulous mandible: a finite element study

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to verify whether the use of short implants could optimize stress distribution of bone surrounding implants in atrophic mandibles with different bone qualities. METHODS: A three-dimensional model of the atrophic mandible with three levels of bone quality was m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Chaowei, Xing, Yifeng, Li, Yan, Lin, Yanjun, Xu, Jianghan, Wu, Dong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9044581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35473637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02164-8
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to verify whether the use of short implants could optimize stress distribution of bone surrounding implants in atrophic mandibles with different bone qualities. METHODS: A three-dimensional model of the atrophic mandible with three levels of bone quality was made using computer software. Short implants (6 mm) and standard implants (10 mm) were used in four designs: Design 1 "All-On four", Design 2 "All-On-four" with two short implants, Design 3 four vertical implants with two short implants, and Design 4 six short implants. The distal short implants were placed at the first molar position. All twelve models were imported into finite element analysis software, and 110 N oblique force was loaded on the left second premolar. Maximum principal stress values of peri-implant bone and the volumes of bone with over 3000 microstrians (overload)were analyzed. RESULT: Stress values and volumes of overload bone increased in all four groups with the decline of bone quality. The highest stress values were found in the cortical bone surrounding the Design 1 inclined implant in two lower bone quality mandibles, and the lowest in Design 3. However, Design 1 had less overload bone tissue than all three designs with short implants. CONCLUSION: Short implants placed posteriorly helped decrease stress values in peri-implant bone, while bone surrounding short implants had a high resorption risk in low bone quality mandible.