Cargando…

Effect of electrical stimulation on patients with diabetes-related ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to systematically review the literature to better understand the efficacy of electrical stimulation (ES) for the treatment of patients with diabetes-related ulcers. METHODS: We searched the Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases through July 31, 2021. Original t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Yinhua, Du, Xue, Yin, Liquan, Liu, Hongying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9044601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35477391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-022-01029-z
_version_ 1784695139690610688
author Zheng, Yinhua
Du, Xue
Yin, Liquan
Liu, Hongying
author_facet Zheng, Yinhua
Du, Xue
Yin, Liquan
Liu, Hongying
author_sort Zheng, Yinhua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to systematically review the literature to better understand the efficacy of electrical stimulation (ES) for the treatment of patients with diabetes-related ulcers. METHODS: We searched the Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases through July 31, 2021. Original trials for ES treatment of patients with diabetes-related ulcers with placebo or standard care as the control group were included. The primary outcomes were ulcer area reduction and healing rates. Meta-analyses were performed to compare the standardized mean difference (SMD) in the percentage of ulcer reduction and risk ratio of non-healing rates between ES treatment and placebo or standard care. We used the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials to assess the risk of bias for each included article. Funnel plots and Egger’s test were used to assess publication bias. RESULTS: Compared to placebo or standard care, ES had a significant benefit for the treatment of patients with diabetes-related ulcers in terms of percentage of ulcer reduction (SMD = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.43–3.69; P < 0.001 (Q-test), I(2) = 93.9%) and ulcer healing rates [risk ratio of non-healing rates for the ES group was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.54–0.96; P = 0.38 (Q-test), I(2) = 2.3%)]. Two, four, and three of the included studies were categorized into low risk of bias, some concerns, and high risk of bias, respectively. No publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this meta-analysis, ES could be used to treat patients with diabetes-related ulcers. ES treatment was effective for ulcer area reduction and ulcer healing, although it had a high heterogeneity level among the included studies. Pulsed current ES has the potential benefit of increasing ulcer healing compared to direct current ES. Further large-scale clinical trials are needed to define the adverse events and potentiators of ES in the treatment of patients with diabetes-related ulcers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12902-022-01029-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9044601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90446012022-04-28 Effect of electrical stimulation on patients with diabetes-related ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zheng, Yinhua Du, Xue Yin, Liquan Liu, Hongying BMC Endocr Disord Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to systematically review the literature to better understand the efficacy of electrical stimulation (ES) for the treatment of patients with diabetes-related ulcers. METHODS: We searched the Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases through July 31, 2021. Original trials for ES treatment of patients with diabetes-related ulcers with placebo or standard care as the control group were included. The primary outcomes were ulcer area reduction and healing rates. Meta-analyses were performed to compare the standardized mean difference (SMD) in the percentage of ulcer reduction and risk ratio of non-healing rates between ES treatment and placebo or standard care. We used the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials to assess the risk of bias for each included article. Funnel plots and Egger’s test were used to assess publication bias. RESULTS: Compared to placebo or standard care, ES had a significant benefit for the treatment of patients with diabetes-related ulcers in terms of percentage of ulcer reduction (SMD = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.43–3.69; P < 0.001 (Q-test), I(2) = 93.9%) and ulcer healing rates [risk ratio of non-healing rates for the ES group was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.54–0.96; P = 0.38 (Q-test), I(2) = 2.3%)]. Two, four, and three of the included studies were categorized into low risk of bias, some concerns, and high risk of bias, respectively. No publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this meta-analysis, ES could be used to treat patients with diabetes-related ulcers. ES treatment was effective for ulcer area reduction and ulcer healing, although it had a high heterogeneity level among the included studies. Pulsed current ES has the potential benefit of increasing ulcer healing compared to direct current ES. Further large-scale clinical trials are needed to define the adverse events and potentiators of ES in the treatment of patients with diabetes-related ulcers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12902-022-01029-z. BioMed Central 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9044601/ /pubmed/35477391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-022-01029-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zheng, Yinhua
Du, Xue
Yin, Liquan
Liu, Hongying
Effect of electrical stimulation on patients with diabetes-related ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effect of electrical stimulation on patients with diabetes-related ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effect of electrical stimulation on patients with diabetes-related ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effect of electrical stimulation on patients with diabetes-related ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of electrical stimulation on patients with diabetes-related ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effect of electrical stimulation on patients with diabetes-related ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effect of electrical stimulation on patients with diabetes-related ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9044601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35477391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-022-01029-z
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengyinhua effectofelectricalstimulationonpatientswithdiabetesrelatedulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT duxue effectofelectricalstimulationonpatientswithdiabetesrelatedulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yinliquan effectofelectricalstimulationonpatientswithdiabetesrelatedulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuhongying effectofelectricalstimulationonpatientswithdiabetesrelatedulcersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis