Cargando…

Recurrent implantation failure and sexual function in infertile Iranian women: a comparative cross sectional study

BACKGROUND: Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) which means failing to implant after two or more high-quality embryo transfer cycles, affects 3% to 5% of women worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between recurrent implantation failure and sexual function in infertile Ira...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghorbani, Samira, Abedi, Parvin, Hekmat, Khadije, Ghanbari, Saeed, Dibavand, Narjes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9044669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35477422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01409-7
_version_ 1784695154516426752
author Ghorbani, Samira
Abedi, Parvin
Hekmat, Khadije
Ghanbari, Saeed
Dibavand, Narjes
author_facet Ghorbani, Samira
Abedi, Parvin
Hekmat, Khadije
Ghanbari, Saeed
Dibavand, Narjes
author_sort Ghorbani, Samira
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) which means failing to implant after two or more high-quality embryo transfer cycles, affects 3% to 5% of women worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between recurrent implantation failure and sexual function in infertile Iranian women. METHODS: This was a comparative cross-sectional study on 180 infertile Iranian women (90 infertile women with recurrent implantation failure and 90 infertile women who did not start infertility treatment). A demographic questionnaire and the Female Sexual Function Index were used for data collection. Data were analyzed using Chi-square, independent t-test, and multiple linear regression. RESULTS: The mean scores of different domains of sexual function (desire, lubrication, arousal, orgasm, pain, and satisfaction) were significantly lower in the group with RIF compared to the group without RIF. The total score of sexual function was significantly lower in the RIF group compared with the group without RIF (23.11 ± 2.24, vs. 25.99 ± 2.35, p < 0.001). The overall sexual function scores in women with RIF were 2.65 units lower than women without RIF (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that women with RIF had significantly lower sexual function than that in women without RIF. Therefore, sexual function issues should be treated as an important component of comprehensive care. This study did not measure the impact of economic factors on sexual function, however, the majority of the sample were classified as having weak or moderate economic status and this, along with the high cost of infertility treatments, could potentially have played a role in the participants' experience. This relationship will need to be investigated in future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9044669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90446692022-04-28 Recurrent implantation failure and sexual function in infertile Iranian women: a comparative cross sectional study Ghorbani, Samira Abedi, Parvin Hekmat, Khadije Ghanbari, Saeed Dibavand, Narjes Reprod Health Research BACKGROUND: Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) which means failing to implant after two or more high-quality embryo transfer cycles, affects 3% to 5% of women worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between recurrent implantation failure and sexual function in infertile Iranian women. METHODS: This was a comparative cross-sectional study on 180 infertile Iranian women (90 infertile women with recurrent implantation failure and 90 infertile women who did not start infertility treatment). A demographic questionnaire and the Female Sexual Function Index were used for data collection. Data were analyzed using Chi-square, independent t-test, and multiple linear regression. RESULTS: The mean scores of different domains of sexual function (desire, lubrication, arousal, orgasm, pain, and satisfaction) were significantly lower in the group with RIF compared to the group without RIF. The total score of sexual function was significantly lower in the RIF group compared with the group without RIF (23.11 ± 2.24, vs. 25.99 ± 2.35, p < 0.001). The overall sexual function scores in women with RIF were 2.65 units lower than women without RIF (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that women with RIF had significantly lower sexual function than that in women without RIF. Therefore, sexual function issues should be treated as an important component of comprehensive care. This study did not measure the impact of economic factors on sexual function, however, the majority of the sample were classified as having weak or moderate economic status and this, along with the high cost of infertility treatments, could potentially have played a role in the participants' experience. This relationship will need to be investigated in future research. BioMed Central 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9044669/ /pubmed/35477422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01409-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ghorbani, Samira
Abedi, Parvin
Hekmat, Khadije
Ghanbari, Saeed
Dibavand, Narjes
Recurrent implantation failure and sexual function in infertile Iranian women: a comparative cross sectional study
title Recurrent implantation failure and sexual function in infertile Iranian women: a comparative cross sectional study
title_full Recurrent implantation failure and sexual function in infertile Iranian women: a comparative cross sectional study
title_fullStr Recurrent implantation failure and sexual function in infertile Iranian women: a comparative cross sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Recurrent implantation failure and sexual function in infertile Iranian women: a comparative cross sectional study
title_short Recurrent implantation failure and sexual function in infertile Iranian women: a comparative cross sectional study
title_sort recurrent implantation failure and sexual function in infertile iranian women: a comparative cross sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9044669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35477422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01409-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ghorbanisamira recurrentimplantationfailureandsexualfunctionininfertileiranianwomenacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT abediparvin recurrentimplantationfailureandsexualfunctionininfertileiranianwomenacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT hekmatkhadije recurrentimplantationfailureandsexualfunctionininfertileiranianwomenacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT ghanbarisaeed recurrentimplantationfailureandsexualfunctionininfertileiranianwomenacomparativecrosssectionalstudy
AT dibavandnarjes recurrentimplantationfailureandsexualfunctionininfertileiranianwomenacomparativecrosssectionalstudy