Cargando…

Can upfront DPYD extended variant testing reduce toxicity and associated hospital costs of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy? A propensity score matched analysis of 2022 UK patients

AIM: To independently assess the impact of mandatory testing using an extended DPYD variant panel (ToxNav®) and consequent dose adjustment of Capecitabine/5-FU on recorded quantitative toxicity, symptoms of depression, and hospital costs. METHODS: We used propensity score matching (PSM) to match 466...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsiachristas, Apostolos, Vallance, Grant, Koleva-Kolarova, Rositsa, Taylor, Harriet, Solomons, Luke, Rizzo, Giovanni, Chaytor, Catherine, Miah, Junel, Wordsworth, Sarah, Hassan, A. Bassim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9044697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35473510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09576-3
_version_ 1784695160238505984
author Tsiachristas, Apostolos
Vallance, Grant
Koleva-Kolarova, Rositsa
Taylor, Harriet
Solomons, Luke
Rizzo, Giovanni
Chaytor, Catherine
Miah, Junel
Wordsworth, Sarah
Hassan, A. Bassim
author_facet Tsiachristas, Apostolos
Vallance, Grant
Koleva-Kolarova, Rositsa
Taylor, Harriet
Solomons, Luke
Rizzo, Giovanni
Chaytor, Catherine
Miah, Junel
Wordsworth, Sarah
Hassan, A. Bassim
author_sort Tsiachristas, Apostolos
collection PubMed
description AIM: To independently assess the impact of mandatory testing using an extended DPYD variant panel (ToxNav®) and consequent dose adjustment of Capecitabine/5-FU on recorded quantitative toxicity, symptoms of depression, and hospital costs. METHODS: We used propensity score matching (PSM) to match 466 patients tested with ToxNav® with 1556 patients from a historical cohort, and performed regression analysis to estimate the impact of ToxNav®on toxicity, depression, and hospital costs. RESULTS: ToxNav® appeared to reduce the likelihood of experiencing moderate (OR: 0.59; 95%CI: 0.45–0.77) and severe anaemia (OR: 0.55; 95%CI: 0.33–0.90), and experience of pain for more than 4 days a week (OR: 0.50; 95%CI: 0.30–0.83), while it increased the likelihood of mild neutropenia (OR: 1.73; 95%CI: 1.27–2.35). It also reduced the cost of chemotherapy by 12% (95%CI: 3–31) or £9765, the cost of non-elective hospitalisation by 23% (95%CI: 8–36) or £2331, and the cost of critical care by 21% (95%CI: 2–36) or £1219 per patient. For the DPYD variant associated with critical risk of toxicity (rs3918290), the improved non-elective hospital costs were > £20,000, whereas variants associated with hand-foot syndrome toxicity had no detectable cost improvement. CONCLUSION: Upfront testing of DPYD variants appears to reduce the toxicity burden of Capecitabine and 5-FU in cancer patients and can lead to substantial hospital cost savings, only if the dose management of the drugs in response to variants detected is standardised and regulated. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09576-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9044697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90446972022-04-28 Can upfront DPYD extended variant testing reduce toxicity and associated hospital costs of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy? A propensity score matched analysis of 2022 UK patients Tsiachristas, Apostolos Vallance, Grant Koleva-Kolarova, Rositsa Taylor, Harriet Solomons, Luke Rizzo, Giovanni Chaytor, Catherine Miah, Junel Wordsworth, Sarah Hassan, A. Bassim BMC Cancer Research AIM: To independently assess the impact of mandatory testing using an extended DPYD variant panel (ToxNav®) and consequent dose adjustment of Capecitabine/5-FU on recorded quantitative toxicity, symptoms of depression, and hospital costs. METHODS: We used propensity score matching (PSM) to match 466 patients tested with ToxNav® with 1556 patients from a historical cohort, and performed regression analysis to estimate the impact of ToxNav®on toxicity, depression, and hospital costs. RESULTS: ToxNav® appeared to reduce the likelihood of experiencing moderate (OR: 0.59; 95%CI: 0.45–0.77) and severe anaemia (OR: 0.55; 95%CI: 0.33–0.90), and experience of pain for more than 4 days a week (OR: 0.50; 95%CI: 0.30–0.83), while it increased the likelihood of mild neutropenia (OR: 1.73; 95%CI: 1.27–2.35). It also reduced the cost of chemotherapy by 12% (95%CI: 3–31) or £9765, the cost of non-elective hospitalisation by 23% (95%CI: 8–36) or £2331, and the cost of critical care by 21% (95%CI: 2–36) or £1219 per patient. For the DPYD variant associated with critical risk of toxicity (rs3918290), the improved non-elective hospital costs were > £20,000, whereas variants associated with hand-foot syndrome toxicity had no detectable cost improvement. CONCLUSION: Upfront testing of DPYD variants appears to reduce the toxicity burden of Capecitabine and 5-FU in cancer patients and can lead to substantial hospital cost savings, only if the dose management of the drugs in response to variants detected is standardised and regulated. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09576-3. BioMed Central 2022-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9044697/ /pubmed/35473510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09576-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tsiachristas, Apostolos
Vallance, Grant
Koleva-Kolarova, Rositsa
Taylor, Harriet
Solomons, Luke
Rizzo, Giovanni
Chaytor, Catherine
Miah, Junel
Wordsworth, Sarah
Hassan, A. Bassim
Can upfront DPYD extended variant testing reduce toxicity and associated hospital costs of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy? A propensity score matched analysis of 2022 UK patients
title Can upfront DPYD extended variant testing reduce toxicity and associated hospital costs of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy? A propensity score matched analysis of 2022 UK patients
title_full Can upfront DPYD extended variant testing reduce toxicity and associated hospital costs of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy? A propensity score matched analysis of 2022 UK patients
title_fullStr Can upfront DPYD extended variant testing reduce toxicity and associated hospital costs of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy? A propensity score matched analysis of 2022 UK patients
title_full_unstemmed Can upfront DPYD extended variant testing reduce toxicity and associated hospital costs of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy? A propensity score matched analysis of 2022 UK patients
title_short Can upfront DPYD extended variant testing reduce toxicity and associated hospital costs of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy? A propensity score matched analysis of 2022 UK patients
title_sort can upfront dpyd extended variant testing reduce toxicity and associated hospital costs of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy? a propensity score matched analysis of 2022 uk patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9044697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35473510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09576-3
work_keys_str_mv AT tsiachristasapostolos canupfrontdpydextendedvarianttestingreducetoxicityandassociatedhospitalcostsoffluoropyrimidinechemotherapyapropensityscorematchedanalysisof2022ukpatients
AT vallancegrant canupfrontdpydextendedvarianttestingreducetoxicityandassociatedhospitalcostsoffluoropyrimidinechemotherapyapropensityscorematchedanalysisof2022ukpatients
AT kolevakolarovarositsa canupfrontdpydextendedvarianttestingreducetoxicityandassociatedhospitalcostsoffluoropyrimidinechemotherapyapropensityscorematchedanalysisof2022ukpatients
AT taylorharriet canupfrontdpydextendedvarianttestingreducetoxicityandassociatedhospitalcostsoffluoropyrimidinechemotherapyapropensityscorematchedanalysisof2022ukpatients
AT solomonsluke canupfrontdpydextendedvarianttestingreducetoxicityandassociatedhospitalcostsoffluoropyrimidinechemotherapyapropensityscorematchedanalysisof2022ukpatients
AT rizzogiovanni canupfrontdpydextendedvarianttestingreducetoxicityandassociatedhospitalcostsoffluoropyrimidinechemotherapyapropensityscorematchedanalysisof2022ukpatients
AT chaytorcatherine canupfrontdpydextendedvarianttestingreducetoxicityandassociatedhospitalcostsoffluoropyrimidinechemotherapyapropensityscorematchedanalysisof2022ukpatients
AT miahjunel canupfrontdpydextendedvarianttestingreducetoxicityandassociatedhospitalcostsoffluoropyrimidinechemotherapyapropensityscorematchedanalysisof2022ukpatients
AT wordsworthsarah canupfrontdpydextendedvarianttestingreducetoxicityandassociatedhospitalcostsoffluoropyrimidinechemotherapyapropensityscorematchedanalysisof2022ukpatients
AT hassanabassim canupfrontdpydextendedvarianttestingreducetoxicityandassociatedhospitalcostsoffluoropyrimidinechemotherapyapropensityscorematchedanalysisof2022ukpatients