Cargando…

Assessing left atrial function in patients with atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common arrhythmia in valvular heart disease (VHD) and is associated with adverse outcomes. HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the left atrial (LA) function in patients with AF‐VHD by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking (CMR‐FT) using LA strain (ε (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hou, Jie, Sun, Yu, Zhang, Libo, Wang, Wei, You, Hongrui, Zhang, Rongrong, Yang, Benqiang, Wang, Huishan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9045075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35289415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23811
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common arrhythmia in valvular heart disease (VHD) and is associated with adverse outcomes. HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the left atrial (LA) function in patients with AF‐VHD by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking (CMR‐FT) using LA strain (ε (s)/ε (e)/ε (a)) and their corresponding strain rate (SRs/SRe/SRa). METHODS: This was a retrospective cross‐sectional inter‐reader and intra‐reader reproducibility conducted from July 1, 2020, to January 31, 2021. A total of 39 patients with AF‐VHD (rheumatic heart valvular disease [RHVD] [n = 22], degenerative heart valvular disease [DHVD] [n = 17]) underwent MRI scans performed with drug‐controlled heart rate before correcting the rhythm and valves through maze procedure. Fifteen participants with normal cardiac MRI were included as healthy control. ε (s)/SRs, ε (e)/SRe, and ε (a)/SRa, corresponding to LA reservoir, conduit, and booster‐pump function, were assessed using Feature Tracking software (CVI42 v5.12.1). RESULTS: Compared with healthy controls, LA global strain parameters (ε (s)/ε (e)/ε (a)/SRs/SRe/SRa) were significantly decreased (all p < 0.001), while LA size and volume were increased in AF‐VHD group (all p < 0.001). In the subgroup, RHVD group showed lower LA total ejection fraction (LATEF) and strain data than DHVD group (12.6% ± 3.3% vs. 19.4 ± 8.6, p = 0.001). Decreased LATEF was significantly related to altered LA strain and strain rate, especially in ε (s), ε (e), and SRs (Pearson/Spearman r/ρ = 0.856/0.837/0.562, respectively; all p < 0.001). Interstudy and intrastudy reproducibility were consistent for LA volumetry and strain parameters (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.88–0.99). CONCLUSIONS: CMR‐FT can be used to assess the LA strain parameters, and identify LA dysfunction and deformation noninvasively, which could be a helpful functional imaging biomarker in the clinical treatment of AF‐VHD.