Cargando…

Retroperitoneal iliac conduits as an alternative access site for endovascular aortic repair: a tertiary care center experience

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal open iliac conduits (ROIC) are used in patients with hostile iliac anatomy undergoing endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). OBJECTIVES: We hereby report our experience of ROIC in patients subjected to EVAR. METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of 8 patients out of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vijayvergiya, Rajesh, Uppal, Lipi, Kasinadhuni, Ganesh, Sharma, Prafull, Sharma, Ashish, Savlania, Ajay, Lal, Anupam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9045532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35515088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.210033
_version_ 1784695338399956992
author Vijayvergiya, Rajesh
Uppal, Lipi
Kasinadhuni, Ganesh
Sharma, Prafull
Sharma, Ashish
Savlania, Ajay
Lal, Anupam
author_facet Vijayvergiya, Rajesh
Uppal, Lipi
Kasinadhuni, Ganesh
Sharma, Prafull
Sharma, Ashish
Savlania, Ajay
Lal, Anupam
author_sort Vijayvergiya, Rajesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal open iliac conduits (ROIC) are used in patients with hostile iliac anatomy undergoing endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). OBJECTIVES: We hereby report our experience of ROIC in patients subjected to EVAR. METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of 8 patients out of a total of 75 patients (11%) who underwent EVAR in the last 10 years. Pre-procedure computed tomography angiography was used to assess the dimensions of iliac and femoral arteries. Patients who had small arterial dimensions (i.e. smaller than the recommended access size for the aortic endograft device) were subjected to ROIC. RESULTS: The mean age of the 3 males and 5 females studied was 45.7 ± 15.2 years. The indication for ROIC was the small caliber ilio-femoral access site in 7 patients and atherosclerotic disease in 1 patient. All external grafts were anastomosed to the right common iliac artery except one which was anastomosed to the aortic bifurcation site because of a small common iliac artery. The procedural success rate was 100%. Local access site complications included infection (n=1), retroperitoneal hematoma (n=1), and need for blood transfusion (n=3). The median post-intervention hospital stay was 10 days. All patients had favorable long-term outcomes at a median follow-up of 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: Female patients require ROIC during EVAR more frequently. Adjunctive use of iliac conduit for EVAR was associated with favorable perioperative and short-term outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9045532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90455322022-05-04 Retroperitoneal iliac conduits as an alternative access site for endovascular aortic repair: a tertiary care center experience Vijayvergiya, Rajesh Uppal, Lipi Kasinadhuni, Ganesh Sharma, Prafull Sharma, Ashish Savlania, Ajay Lal, Anupam J Vasc Bras Original Article BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal open iliac conduits (ROIC) are used in patients with hostile iliac anatomy undergoing endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). OBJECTIVES: We hereby report our experience of ROIC in patients subjected to EVAR. METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of 8 patients out of a total of 75 patients (11%) who underwent EVAR in the last 10 years. Pre-procedure computed tomography angiography was used to assess the dimensions of iliac and femoral arteries. Patients who had small arterial dimensions (i.e. smaller than the recommended access size for the aortic endograft device) were subjected to ROIC. RESULTS: The mean age of the 3 males and 5 females studied was 45.7 ± 15.2 years. The indication for ROIC was the small caliber ilio-femoral access site in 7 patients and atherosclerotic disease in 1 patient. All external grafts were anastomosed to the right common iliac artery except one which was anastomosed to the aortic bifurcation site because of a small common iliac artery. The procedural success rate was 100%. Local access site complications included infection (n=1), retroperitoneal hematoma (n=1), and need for blood transfusion (n=3). The median post-intervention hospital stay was 10 days. All patients had favorable long-term outcomes at a median follow-up of 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: Female patients require ROIC during EVAR more frequently. Adjunctive use of iliac conduit for EVAR was associated with favorable perioperative and short-term outcomes. Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV) 2021-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9045532/ /pubmed/35515088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.210033 Text en Copyright© 2021 The authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vijayvergiya, Rajesh
Uppal, Lipi
Kasinadhuni, Ganesh
Sharma, Prafull
Sharma, Ashish
Savlania, Ajay
Lal, Anupam
Retroperitoneal iliac conduits as an alternative access site for endovascular aortic repair: a tertiary care center experience
title Retroperitoneal iliac conduits as an alternative access site for endovascular aortic repair: a tertiary care center experience
title_full Retroperitoneal iliac conduits as an alternative access site for endovascular aortic repair: a tertiary care center experience
title_fullStr Retroperitoneal iliac conduits as an alternative access site for endovascular aortic repair: a tertiary care center experience
title_full_unstemmed Retroperitoneal iliac conduits as an alternative access site for endovascular aortic repair: a tertiary care center experience
title_short Retroperitoneal iliac conduits as an alternative access site for endovascular aortic repair: a tertiary care center experience
title_sort retroperitoneal iliac conduits as an alternative access site for endovascular aortic repair: a tertiary care center experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9045532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35515088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.210033
work_keys_str_mv AT vijayvergiyarajesh retroperitonealiliacconduitsasanalternativeaccesssiteforendovascularaorticrepairatertiarycarecenterexperience
AT uppallipi retroperitonealiliacconduitsasanalternativeaccesssiteforendovascularaorticrepairatertiarycarecenterexperience
AT kasinadhuniganesh retroperitonealiliacconduitsasanalternativeaccesssiteforendovascularaorticrepairatertiarycarecenterexperience
AT sharmaprafull retroperitonealiliacconduitsasanalternativeaccesssiteforendovascularaorticrepairatertiarycarecenterexperience
AT sharmaashish retroperitonealiliacconduitsasanalternativeaccesssiteforendovascularaorticrepairatertiarycarecenterexperience
AT savlaniaajay retroperitonealiliacconduitsasanalternativeaccesssiteforendovascularaorticrepairatertiarycarecenterexperience
AT lalanupam retroperitonealiliacconduitsasanalternativeaccesssiteforendovascularaorticrepairatertiarycarecenterexperience