Cargando…
Retroperitoneal iliac conduits as an alternative access site for endovascular aortic repair: a tertiary care center experience
BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal open iliac conduits (ROIC) are used in patients with hostile iliac anatomy undergoing endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). OBJECTIVES: We hereby report our experience of ROIC in patients subjected to EVAR. METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of 8 patients out of a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9045532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35515088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.210033 |
_version_ | 1784695338399956992 |
---|---|
author | Vijayvergiya, Rajesh Uppal, Lipi Kasinadhuni, Ganesh Sharma, Prafull Sharma, Ashish Savlania, Ajay Lal, Anupam |
author_facet | Vijayvergiya, Rajesh Uppal, Lipi Kasinadhuni, Ganesh Sharma, Prafull Sharma, Ashish Savlania, Ajay Lal, Anupam |
author_sort | Vijayvergiya, Rajesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal open iliac conduits (ROIC) are used in patients with hostile iliac anatomy undergoing endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). OBJECTIVES: We hereby report our experience of ROIC in patients subjected to EVAR. METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of 8 patients out of a total of 75 patients (11%) who underwent EVAR in the last 10 years. Pre-procedure computed tomography angiography was used to assess the dimensions of iliac and femoral arteries. Patients who had small arterial dimensions (i.e. smaller than the recommended access size for the aortic endograft device) were subjected to ROIC. RESULTS: The mean age of the 3 males and 5 females studied was 45.7 ± 15.2 years. The indication for ROIC was the small caliber ilio-femoral access site in 7 patients and atherosclerotic disease in 1 patient. All external grafts were anastomosed to the right common iliac artery except one which was anastomosed to the aortic bifurcation site because of a small common iliac artery. The procedural success rate was 100%. Local access site complications included infection (n=1), retroperitoneal hematoma (n=1), and need for blood transfusion (n=3). The median post-intervention hospital stay was 10 days. All patients had favorable long-term outcomes at a median follow-up of 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: Female patients require ROIC during EVAR more frequently. Adjunctive use of iliac conduit for EVAR was associated with favorable perioperative and short-term outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9045532 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90455322022-05-04 Retroperitoneal iliac conduits as an alternative access site for endovascular aortic repair: a tertiary care center experience Vijayvergiya, Rajesh Uppal, Lipi Kasinadhuni, Ganesh Sharma, Prafull Sharma, Ashish Savlania, Ajay Lal, Anupam J Vasc Bras Original Article BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal open iliac conduits (ROIC) are used in patients with hostile iliac anatomy undergoing endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). OBJECTIVES: We hereby report our experience of ROIC in patients subjected to EVAR. METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of 8 patients out of a total of 75 patients (11%) who underwent EVAR in the last 10 years. Pre-procedure computed tomography angiography was used to assess the dimensions of iliac and femoral arteries. Patients who had small arterial dimensions (i.e. smaller than the recommended access size for the aortic endograft device) were subjected to ROIC. RESULTS: The mean age of the 3 males and 5 females studied was 45.7 ± 15.2 years. The indication for ROIC was the small caliber ilio-femoral access site in 7 patients and atherosclerotic disease in 1 patient. All external grafts were anastomosed to the right common iliac artery except one which was anastomosed to the aortic bifurcation site because of a small common iliac artery. The procedural success rate was 100%. Local access site complications included infection (n=1), retroperitoneal hematoma (n=1), and need for blood transfusion (n=3). The median post-intervention hospital stay was 10 days. All patients had favorable long-term outcomes at a median follow-up of 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: Female patients require ROIC during EVAR more frequently. Adjunctive use of iliac conduit for EVAR was associated with favorable perioperative and short-term outcomes. Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV) 2021-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9045532/ /pubmed/35515088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.210033 Text en Copyright© 2021 The authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Vijayvergiya, Rajesh Uppal, Lipi Kasinadhuni, Ganesh Sharma, Prafull Sharma, Ashish Savlania, Ajay Lal, Anupam Retroperitoneal iliac conduits as an alternative access site for endovascular aortic repair: a tertiary care center experience |
title | Retroperitoneal iliac conduits as an alternative access site for endovascular aortic repair: a tertiary care center experience |
title_full | Retroperitoneal iliac conduits as an alternative access site for endovascular aortic repair: a tertiary care center experience |
title_fullStr | Retroperitoneal iliac conduits as an alternative access site for endovascular aortic repair: a tertiary care center experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Retroperitoneal iliac conduits as an alternative access site for endovascular aortic repair: a tertiary care center experience |
title_short | Retroperitoneal iliac conduits as an alternative access site for endovascular aortic repair: a tertiary care center experience |
title_sort | retroperitoneal iliac conduits as an alternative access site for endovascular aortic repair: a tertiary care center experience |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9045532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35515088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.210033 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vijayvergiyarajesh retroperitonealiliacconduitsasanalternativeaccesssiteforendovascularaorticrepairatertiarycarecenterexperience AT uppallipi retroperitonealiliacconduitsasanalternativeaccesssiteforendovascularaorticrepairatertiarycarecenterexperience AT kasinadhuniganesh retroperitonealiliacconduitsasanalternativeaccesssiteforendovascularaorticrepairatertiarycarecenterexperience AT sharmaprafull retroperitonealiliacconduitsasanalternativeaccesssiteforendovascularaorticrepairatertiarycarecenterexperience AT sharmaashish retroperitonealiliacconduitsasanalternativeaccesssiteforendovascularaorticrepairatertiarycarecenterexperience AT savlaniaajay retroperitonealiliacconduitsasanalternativeaccesssiteforendovascularaorticrepairatertiarycarecenterexperience AT lalanupam retroperitonealiliacconduitsasanalternativeaccesssiteforendovascularaorticrepairatertiarycarecenterexperience |