Cargando…

Use of artificial intelligence as a didactic tool to improve ejection fraction assessment in the emergency department: A randomized controlled pilot study

OBJECTIVES: Incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into echocardiography operated by clinicians working in the emergency department to accurately assess left‐ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) may lead to better diagnostic decisions. This randomized controlled pilot study aimed to evaluate AI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dadon, Ziv, Butnaru, Adi, Rosenmann, David, Alper‐Suissa, Liat, Glikson, Michael, Alpert, Evan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9045570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35493288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10738
_version_ 1784695344589701120
author Dadon, Ziv
Butnaru, Adi
Rosenmann, David
Alper‐Suissa, Liat
Glikson, Michael
Alpert, Evan A.
author_facet Dadon, Ziv
Butnaru, Adi
Rosenmann, David
Alper‐Suissa, Liat
Glikson, Michael
Alpert, Evan A.
author_sort Dadon, Ziv
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into echocardiography operated by clinicians working in the emergency department to accurately assess left‐ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) may lead to better diagnostic decisions. This randomized controlled pilot study aimed to evaluate AI use as a didactic tool to improve noncardiologist clinicians’ assessment of LVEF from the apical 4‐chamber (A4ch) view. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled pilot study tested the feasibility and acceptability of the incorporation of AI as a didactic tool by comparing the ability of 16 clinicians who work in the emergency department to assess LVEF before and after the introduction of an AI‐based ultrasound application. Following a brief didactic course, participants were randomly equally divided into an intervention and a control group. In each of the first and second sessions, both groups were shown 10 echocardiography A4ch clips and asked to assess LVEF. Following each clip assessment, only the intervention group was shown the results of the AI‐based tool. For the final session, both groups were presented with a new set of 40 clips and asked to evaluate the LVEF. RESULTS: In the “normal‐abnormal” category evaluation, as related to own baseline accuracy assessment, the intervention group had an improvement in accuracy on 50 consecutive clip assessments compared with a decline in the control group (0.10 vs. −0.12, respectively, p = 0.038). In the “significantly reduced LVEF” category, the intervention group showed significantly less decline in clip assessment as compared to the control group (−0.03 vs. −0.12, respectively, p = 0.050). CONCLUSIONS: A study involving AI incorporation as a didactic tool for clinicians working in the emergency department appears feasible and acceptable. The introduction of an AI‐based tool to clinicians working in the emergency department improved the assessment accuracy of LVEF as compared to the control group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9045570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90455702022-04-28 Use of artificial intelligence as a didactic tool to improve ejection fraction assessment in the emergency department: A randomized controlled pilot study Dadon, Ziv Butnaru, Adi Rosenmann, David Alper‐Suissa, Liat Glikson, Michael Alpert, Evan A. AEM Educ Train Original Contribution OBJECTIVES: Incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into echocardiography operated by clinicians working in the emergency department to accurately assess left‐ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) may lead to better diagnostic decisions. This randomized controlled pilot study aimed to evaluate AI use as a didactic tool to improve noncardiologist clinicians’ assessment of LVEF from the apical 4‐chamber (A4ch) view. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled pilot study tested the feasibility and acceptability of the incorporation of AI as a didactic tool by comparing the ability of 16 clinicians who work in the emergency department to assess LVEF before and after the introduction of an AI‐based ultrasound application. Following a brief didactic course, participants were randomly equally divided into an intervention and a control group. In each of the first and second sessions, both groups were shown 10 echocardiography A4ch clips and asked to assess LVEF. Following each clip assessment, only the intervention group was shown the results of the AI‐based tool. For the final session, both groups were presented with a new set of 40 clips and asked to evaluate the LVEF. RESULTS: In the “normal‐abnormal” category evaluation, as related to own baseline accuracy assessment, the intervention group had an improvement in accuracy on 50 consecutive clip assessments compared with a decline in the control group (0.10 vs. −0.12, respectively, p = 0.038). In the “significantly reduced LVEF” category, the intervention group showed significantly less decline in clip assessment as compared to the control group (−0.03 vs. −0.12, respectively, p = 0.050). CONCLUSIONS: A study involving AI incorporation as a didactic tool for clinicians working in the emergency department appears feasible and acceptable. The introduction of an AI‐based tool to clinicians working in the emergency department improved the assessment accuracy of LVEF as compared to the control group. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9045570/ /pubmed/35493288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10738 Text en © 2022 The Authors. AEM Education and Training published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Contribution
Dadon, Ziv
Butnaru, Adi
Rosenmann, David
Alper‐Suissa, Liat
Glikson, Michael
Alpert, Evan A.
Use of artificial intelligence as a didactic tool to improve ejection fraction assessment in the emergency department: A randomized controlled pilot study
title Use of artificial intelligence as a didactic tool to improve ejection fraction assessment in the emergency department: A randomized controlled pilot study
title_full Use of artificial intelligence as a didactic tool to improve ejection fraction assessment in the emergency department: A randomized controlled pilot study
title_fullStr Use of artificial intelligence as a didactic tool to improve ejection fraction assessment in the emergency department: A randomized controlled pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Use of artificial intelligence as a didactic tool to improve ejection fraction assessment in the emergency department: A randomized controlled pilot study
title_short Use of artificial intelligence as a didactic tool to improve ejection fraction assessment in the emergency department: A randomized controlled pilot study
title_sort use of artificial intelligence as a didactic tool to improve ejection fraction assessment in the emergency department: a randomized controlled pilot study
topic Original Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9045570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35493288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10738
work_keys_str_mv AT dadonziv useofartificialintelligenceasadidactictooltoimproveejectionfractionassessmentintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT butnaruadi useofartificialintelligenceasadidactictooltoimproveejectionfractionassessmentintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT rosenmanndavid useofartificialintelligenceasadidactictooltoimproveejectionfractionassessmentintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT alpersuissaliat useofartificialintelligenceasadidactictooltoimproveejectionfractionassessmentintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT gliksonmichael useofartificialintelligenceasadidactictooltoimproveejectionfractionassessmentintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy
AT alpertevana useofartificialintelligenceasadidactictooltoimproveejectionfractionassessmentintheemergencydepartmentarandomizedcontrolledpilotstudy