Cargando…

Red and white blood cell morphology characterization and hands-on time analysis by the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60

BACKGROUND: The Sysmex DI-60 digital morphology analyzer is a fully automated, cell-locating image analysis system. This study aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of DI-60. METHODS: A total of 822 peripheral blood smears were used. The diagnostic performance of DI-60 in terms of red blood c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kweon, Oh Joo, Lim, Yong Kwan, Lee, Mi-Kyung, Kim, Hye Ryoun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9045635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35476704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267638
_version_ 1784695358178197504
author Kweon, Oh Joo
Lim, Yong Kwan
Lee, Mi-Kyung
Kim, Hye Ryoun
author_facet Kweon, Oh Joo
Lim, Yong Kwan
Lee, Mi-Kyung
Kim, Hye Ryoun
author_sort Kweon, Oh Joo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Sysmex DI-60 digital morphology analyzer is a fully automated, cell-locating image analysis system. This study aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of DI-60. METHODS: A total of 822 peripheral blood smears were used. The diagnostic performance of DI-60 in terms of red blood cell (RBC) morphology characterization, white blood cell (WBC) differentials, and the total assay time including hands-on time was evaluated. RESULTS: In comparison with manual slide review, DI-60 demonstrated acceptable accuracy in recognizing polychromasia, target cells, and ovalocytes. However, for schistocytes, DI-60 demonstrated low specificity (10.4%) despite the high sensitivity (97.2%). In the precision analysis of RBC morphology characterization, borderline samples harboring specific RBCs showed inconsistencies in the positive results among 20 replicates. Particularly, 6 of 10 samples showed inconsistencies in the precision for schistocytes. For WBC differentials, the overall agreement between pre-classification results and user-verified results was 89.4%. Except for basophils, normal WBCs showed a good correlation between DI-60 (after user verification) and manual counts. The sensitivities in detecting immature granulocytes, blasts, atypical lymphocytes, and normoblasts were 85.9%, 92.0%, 37.5%, and 77.6%, respectively. Although the total assay time of DI-60 was longer than that of manual review, the hands-on time was considerably shorter with a difference of 144.1 s/slide for abnormal samples. CONCLUSION: DI-60 demonstrated acceptable performance for normal samples. However, for abnormal WBC differentials and RBC morphology characterization, it should be utilized carefully. DI-60 may contribute to an improvement in laboratory efficiency with increased feasibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9045635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90456352022-04-28 Red and white blood cell morphology characterization and hands-on time analysis by the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60 Kweon, Oh Joo Lim, Yong Kwan Lee, Mi-Kyung Kim, Hye Ryoun PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The Sysmex DI-60 digital morphology analyzer is a fully automated, cell-locating image analysis system. This study aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of DI-60. METHODS: A total of 822 peripheral blood smears were used. The diagnostic performance of DI-60 in terms of red blood cell (RBC) morphology characterization, white blood cell (WBC) differentials, and the total assay time including hands-on time was evaluated. RESULTS: In comparison with manual slide review, DI-60 demonstrated acceptable accuracy in recognizing polychromasia, target cells, and ovalocytes. However, for schistocytes, DI-60 demonstrated low specificity (10.4%) despite the high sensitivity (97.2%). In the precision analysis of RBC morphology characterization, borderline samples harboring specific RBCs showed inconsistencies in the positive results among 20 replicates. Particularly, 6 of 10 samples showed inconsistencies in the precision for schistocytes. For WBC differentials, the overall agreement between pre-classification results and user-verified results was 89.4%. Except for basophils, normal WBCs showed a good correlation between DI-60 (after user verification) and manual counts. The sensitivities in detecting immature granulocytes, blasts, atypical lymphocytes, and normoblasts were 85.9%, 92.0%, 37.5%, and 77.6%, respectively. Although the total assay time of DI-60 was longer than that of manual review, the hands-on time was considerably shorter with a difference of 144.1 s/slide for abnormal samples. CONCLUSION: DI-60 demonstrated acceptable performance for normal samples. However, for abnormal WBC differentials and RBC morphology characterization, it should be utilized carefully. DI-60 may contribute to an improvement in laboratory efficiency with increased feasibility. Public Library of Science 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9045635/ /pubmed/35476704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267638 Text en © 2022 Kweon et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kweon, Oh Joo
Lim, Yong Kwan
Lee, Mi-Kyung
Kim, Hye Ryoun
Red and white blood cell morphology characterization and hands-on time analysis by the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60
title Red and white blood cell morphology characterization and hands-on time analysis by the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60
title_full Red and white blood cell morphology characterization and hands-on time analysis by the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60
title_fullStr Red and white blood cell morphology characterization and hands-on time analysis by the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60
title_full_unstemmed Red and white blood cell morphology characterization and hands-on time analysis by the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60
title_short Red and white blood cell morphology characterization and hands-on time analysis by the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60
title_sort red and white blood cell morphology characterization and hands-on time analysis by the digital cell imaging analyzer di-60
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9045635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35476704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267638
work_keys_str_mv AT kweonohjoo redandwhitebloodcellmorphologycharacterizationandhandsontimeanalysisbythedigitalcellimaginganalyzerdi60
AT limyongkwan redandwhitebloodcellmorphologycharacterizationandhandsontimeanalysisbythedigitalcellimaginganalyzerdi60
AT leemikyung redandwhitebloodcellmorphologycharacterizationandhandsontimeanalysisbythedigitalcellimaginganalyzerdi60
AT kimhyeryoun redandwhitebloodcellmorphologycharacterizationandhandsontimeanalysisbythedigitalcellimaginganalyzerdi60