Cargando…

Healthcare workers use of psychological support resources during COVID-19; a mixed methods approach utilising Pillar Integration Analysis

OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine healthcare workers (HCWs) utilisation of formal and informal psychological support resources in the workplace during the first and third waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ireland. METHODS: A convergent mixed methods approach was undertaken. Four hundred and thirty HC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richards, Helen L., Eustace, Joseph, O’ Dwyer, Amanda, Wormald, Andrew, Curtin, Yvonne, Fortune, Dónal G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9045652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35476796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267458
_version_ 1784695363245965312
author Richards, Helen L.
Eustace, Joseph
O’ Dwyer, Amanda
Wormald, Andrew
Curtin, Yvonne
Fortune, Dónal G.
author_facet Richards, Helen L.
Eustace, Joseph
O’ Dwyer, Amanda
Wormald, Andrew
Curtin, Yvonne
Fortune, Dónal G.
author_sort Richards, Helen L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine healthcare workers (HCWs) utilisation of formal and informal psychological support resources in the workplace during the first and third waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ireland. METHODS: A convergent mixed methods approach was undertaken. Four hundred and thirty HCWs in the Mid West and South of Ireland responded to an online survey in terms of their use of psychological support resources during Wave 1 (April/May 2020) of COVID-19. Thirty-nine HCWs undertook in depth interviews at Wave 3 (January/February 2021), and a further quantitative survey was distributed and completed by 278 HCWs at this time. Quantitative data arising at Wave 1 and Wave 3, were synthesised with Qualitative data collected at Wave 3. A Pillar Integration Process (PIP) was utilised in the analysis of the quantitative and qualitative data. RESULTS: Five pillars were identified from the integration of results. These were: a) the primacy of peer support, b) the importance of psychologically informed management, c) a need to develop the organisational well-being ethos, d) support for all HCWs, and e) HCWs ideas for developing the well-being path. These pillars encapsulated a strong emphasis on collegial support, an emphasis on the need to support managers, a questioning of the current supports provided within the healthcare organisations and critical reflections on what HCWs viewed as most helpful for their future support needs. CONCLUSIONS: HCWs who utilised supportive resources indicated ‘in house’ supports, primarily collegial resources, were the most frequently used and perceived as most helpful. While formal psychological supports were important, the mechanism by which such psychological support is made available, through utilising peer support structures and moving towards psychologically informed supervisors and workplaces is likely to be more sustainable and perceived more positively by HCWs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9045652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90456522022-04-28 Healthcare workers use of psychological support resources during COVID-19; a mixed methods approach utilising Pillar Integration Analysis Richards, Helen L. Eustace, Joseph O’ Dwyer, Amanda Wormald, Andrew Curtin, Yvonne Fortune, Dónal G. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine healthcare workers (HCWs) utilisation of formal and informal psychological support resources in the workplace during the first and third waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ireland. METHODS: A convergent mixed methods approach was undertaken. Four hundred and thirty HCWs in the Mid West and South of Ireland responded to an online survey in terms of their use of psychological support resources during Wave 1 (April/May 2020) of COVID-19. Thirty-nine HCWs undertook in depth interviews at Wave 3 (January/February 2021), and a further quantitative survey was distributed and completed by 278 HCWs at this time. Quantitative data arising at Wave 1 and Wave 3, were synthesised with Qualitative data collected at Wave 3. A Pillar Integration Process (PIP) was utilised in the analysis of the quantitative and qualitative data. RESULTS: Five pillars were identified from the integration of results. These were: a) the primacy of peer support, b) the importance of psychologically informed management, c) a need to develop the organisational well-being ethos, d) support for all HCWs, and e) HCWs ideas for developing the well-being path. These pillars encapsulated a strong emphasis on collegial support, an emphasis on the need to support managers, a questioning of the current supports provided within the healthcare organisations and critical reflections on what HCWs viewed as most helpful for their future support needs. CONCLUSIONS: HCWs who utilised supportive resources indicated ‘in house’ supports, primarily collegial resources, were the most frequently used and perceived as most helpful. While formal psychological supports were important, the mechanism by which such psychological support is made available, through utilising peer support structures and moving towards psychologically informed supervisors and workplaces is likely to be more sustainable and perceived more positively by HCWs. Public Library of Science 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9045652/ /pubmed/35476796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267458 Text en © 2022 Richards et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Richards, Helen L.
Eustace, Joseph
O’ Dwyer, Amanda
Wormald, Andrew
Curtin, Yvonne
Fortune, Dónal G.
Healthcare workers use of psychological support resources during COVID-19; a mixed methods approach utilising Pillar Integration Analysis
title Healthcare workers use of psychological support resources during COVID-19; a mixed methods approach utilising Pillar Integration Analysis
title_full Healthcare workers use of psychological support resources during COVID-19; a mixed methods approach utilising Pillar Integration Analysis
title_fullStr Healthcare workers use of psychological support resources during COVID-19; a mixed methods approach utilising Pillar Integration Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare workers use of psychological support resources during COVID-19; a mixed methods approach utilising Pillar Integration Analysis
title_short Healthcare workers use of psychological support resources during COVID-19; a mixed methods approach utilising Pillar Integration Analysis
title_sort healthcare workers use of psychological support resources during covid-19; a mixed methods approach utilising pillar integration analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9045652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35476796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267458
work_keys_str_mv AT richardshelenl healthcareworkersuseofpsychologicalsupportresourcesduringcovid19amixedmethodsapproachutilisingpillarintegrationanalysis
AT eustacejoseph healthcareworkersuseofpsychologicalsupportresourcesduringcovid19amixedmethodsapproachutilisingpillarintegrationanalysis
AT odwyeramanda healthcareworkersuseofpsychologicalsupportresourcesduringcovid19amixedmethodsapproachutilisingpillarintegrationanalysis
AT wormaldandrew healthcareworkersuseofpsychologicalsupportresourcesduringcovid19amixedmethodsapproachutilisingpillarintegrationanalysis
AT curtinyvonne healthcareworkersuseofpsychologicalsupportresourcesduringcovid19amixedmethodsapproachutilisingpillarintegrationanalysis
AT fortunedonalg healthcareworkersuseofpsychologicalsupportresourcesduringcovid19amixedmethodsapproachutilisingpillarintegrationanalysis