Cargando…
The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Diabetes foot ulcer (DFU) is a complication of diabetes mellitus. Accurate diagnosis of DFU severity through inflammatory markers will assist in reducing impact on quality of life. We aimed to ascertain the diagnostic test accuracy of commonly used inflammatory markers such as erythrocyt...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9045669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35476639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267412 |
_version_ | 1784695367393083392 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Harman Sharma, Sandhli Krishnan, Anirudh Yuan, Daniel Vangaveti, Venkat N. Malabu, Usman H. Haleagrahara, Nagaraja |
author_facet | Sharma, Harman Sharma, Sandhli Krishnan, Anirudh Yuan, Daniel Vangaveti, Venkat N. Malabu, Usman H. Haleagrahara, Nagaraja |
author_sort | Sharma, Harman |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Diabetes foot ulcer (DFU) is a complication of diabetes mellitus. Accurate diagnosis of DFU severity through inflammatory markers will assist in reducing impact on quality of life. We aimed to ascertain the diagnostic test accuracy of commonly used inflammatory markers such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and white cell count (WCC) for the diagnosis and differentiation between DFU grades based on the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot classification system. METHODS: This systematic review explored studies that investigated one or more of the above-listed index tests aiding in diagnosing infected DFU. This review was registered on PROSPERO database (ID = CRD42021255618) and searched 5 databases including an assessment of the references of included studies. Records were manually screened as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A total of 16 studies were included which were assessed for quality using QUADAS-2 tool and meta-analysed using Meta-Disc v1.4. RESULTS: CRP had the greatest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.893 for diagnosing grade 2 DFU. This returned a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 77.4% (95% CI: 72% to 82%) and 84.3% (95% CI: 79% to 89%) respectively. In terms of diagnosing grade 3 DFU, procalcitonin had the highest AUC value of 0.844 when compared with other markers. The pooled sensitivity of PCT was calculated as 85.5% (95% CI: 79% to 90%) and specificity as 68.9% (95% CI: 63% to 75%). CONCLUSION: CRP and PCT are the best markers for diagnosing grade 2 and grade 3 DFU respectively. Other markers are also valuable when used in conjunction with clinical judgement. The findings accentuate the necessity of further research to establish standardised cut-off values for these inflammatory markers in diagnosing diabetic foot ulcers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9045669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90456692022-04-28 The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis Sharma, Harman Sharma, Sandhli Krishnan, Anirudh Yuan, Daniel Vangaveti, Venkat N. Malabu, Usman H. Haleagrahara, Nagaraja PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Diabetes foot ulcer (DFU) is a complication of diabetes mellitus. Accurate diagnosis of DFU severity through inflammatory markers will assist in reducing impact on quality of life. We aimed to ascertain the diagnostic test accuracy of commonly used inflammatory markers such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and white cell count (WCC) for the diagnosis and differentiation between DFU grades based on the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot classification system. METHODS: This systematic review explored studies that investigated one or more of the above-listed index tests aiding in diagnosing infected DFU. This review was registered on PROSPERO database (ID = CRD42021255618) and searched 5 databases including an assessment of the references of included studies. Records were manually screened as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A total of 16 studies were included which were assessed for quality using QUADAS-2 tool and meta-analysed using Meta-Disc v1.4. RESULTS: CRP had the greatest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.893 for diagnosing grade 2 DFU. This returned a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 77.4% (95% CI: 72% to 82%) and 84.3% (95% CI: 79% to 89%) respectively. In terms of diagnosing grade 3 DFU, procalcitonin had the highest AUC value of 0.844 when compared with other markers. The pooled sensitivity of PCT was calculated as 85.5% (95% CI: 79% to 90%) and specificity as 68.9% (95% CI: 63% to 75%). CONCLUSION: CRP and PCT are the best markers for diagnosing grade 2 and grade 3 DFU respectively. Other markers are also valuable when used in conjunction with clinical judgement. The findings accentuate the necessity of further research to establish standardised cut-off values for these inflammatory markers in diagnosing diabetic foot ulcers. Public Library of Science 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9045669/ /pubmed/35476639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267412 Text en © 2022 Sharma et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sharma, Harman Sharma, Sandhli Krishnan, Anirudh Yuan, Daniel Vangaveti, Venkat N. Malabu, Usman H. Haleagrahara, Nagaraja The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9045669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35476639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267412 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmaharman theefficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sharmasandhli theefficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT krishnananirudh theefficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yuandaniel theefficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vangavetivenkatn theefficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT malabuusmanh theefficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT haleagraharanagaraja theefficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sharmaharman efficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sharmasandhli efficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT krishnananirudh efficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yuandaniel efficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vangavetivenkatn efficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT malabuusmanh efficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT haleagraharanagaraja efficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |