Cargando…

The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Diabetes foot ulcer (DFU) is a complication of diabetes mellitus. Accurate diagnosis of DFU severity through inflammatory markers will assist in reducing impact on quality of life. We aimed to ascertain the diagnostic test accuracy of commonly used inflammatory markers such as erythrocyt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Harman, Sharma, Sandhli, Krishnan, Anirudh, Yuan, Daniel, Vangaveti, Venkat N., Malabu, Usman H., Haleagrahara, Nagaraja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9045669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35476639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267412
_version_ 1784695367393083392
author Sharma, Harman
Sharma, Sandhli
Krishnan, Anirudh
Yuan, Daniel
Vangaveti, Venkat N.
Malabu, Usman H.
Haleagrahara, Nagaraja
author_facet Sharma, Harman
Sharma, Sandhli
Krishnan, Anirudh
Yuan, Daniel
Vangaveti, Venkat N.
Malabu, Usman H.
Haleagrahara, Nagaraja
author_sort Sharma, Harman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diabetes foot ulcer (DFU) is a complication of diabetes mellitus. Accurate diagnosis of DFU severity through inflammatory markers will assist in reducing impact on quality of life. We aimed to ascertain the diagnostic test accuracy of commonly used inflammatory markers such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and white cell count (WCC) for the diagnosis and differentiation between DFU grades based on the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot classification system. METHODS: This systematic review explored studies that investigated one or more of the above-listed index tests aiding in diagnosing infected DFU. This review was registered on PROSPERO database (ID = CRD42021255618) and searched 5 databases including an assessment of the references of included studies. Records were manually screened as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A total of 16 studies were included which were assessed for quality using QUADAS-2 tool and meta-analysed using Meta-Disc v1.4. RESULTS: CRP had the greatest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.893 for diagnosing grade 2 DFU. This returned a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 77.4% (95% CI: 72% to 82%) and 84.3% (95% CI: 79% to 89%) respectively. In terms of diagnosing grade 3 DFU, procalcitonin had the highest AUC value of 0.844 when compared with other markers. The pooled sensitivity of PCT was calculated as 85.5% (95% CI: 79% to 90%) and specificity as 68.9% (95% CI: 63% to 75%). CONCLUSION: CRP and PCT are the best markers for diagnosing grade 2 and grade 3 DFU respectively. Other markers are also valuable when used in conjunction with clinical judgement. The findings accentuate the necessity of further research to establish standardised cut-off values for these inflammatory markers in diagnosing diabetic foot ulcers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9045669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90456692022-04-28 The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis Sharma, Harman Sharma, Sandhli Krishnan, Anirudh Yuan, Daniel Vangaveti, Venkat N. Malabu, Usman H. Haleagrahara, Nagaraja PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Diabetes foot ulcer (DFU) is a complication of diabetes mellitus. Accurate diagnosis of DFU severity through inflammatory markers will assist in reducing impact on quality of life. We aimed to ascertain the diagnostic test accuracy of commonly used inflammatory markers such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and white cell count (WCC) for the diagnosis and differentiation between DFU grades based on the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot classification system. METHODS: This systematic review explored studies that investigated one or more of the above-listed index tests aiding in diagnosing infected DFU. This review was registered on PROSPERO database (ID = CRD42021255618) and searched 5 databases including an assessment of the references of included studies. Records were manually screened as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A total of 16 studies were included which were assessed for quality using QUADAS-2 tool and meta-analysed using Meta-Disc v1.4. RESULTS: CRP had the greatest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.893 for diagnosing grade 2 DFU. This returned a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 77.4% (95% CI: 72% to 82%) and 84.3% (95% CI: 79% to 89%) respectively. In terms of diagnosing grade 3 DFU, procalcitonin had the highest AUC value of 0.844 when compared with other markers. The pooled sensitivity of PCT was calculated as 85.5% (95% CI: 79% to 90%) and specificity as 68.9% (95% CI: 63% to 75%). CONCLUSION: CRP and PCT are the best markers for diagnosing grade 2 and grade 3 DFU respectively. Other markers are also valuable when used in conjunction with clinical judgement. The findings accentuate the necessity of further research to establish standardised cut-off values for these inflammatory markers in diagnosing diabetic foot ulcers. Public Library of Science 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9045669/ /pubmed/35476639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267412 Text en © 2022 Sharma et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sharma, Harman
Sharma, Sandhli
Krishnan, Anirudh
Yuan, Daniel
Vangaveti, Venkat N.
Malabu, Usman H.
Haleagrahara, Nagaraja
The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9045669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35476639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267412
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmaharman theefficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sharmasandhli theefficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT krishnananirudh theefficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuandaniel theefficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vangavetivenkatn theefficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT malabuusmanh theefficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT haleagraharanagaraja theefficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sharmaharman efficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sharmasandhli efficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT krishnananirudh efficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuandaniel efficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vangavetivenkatn efficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT malabuusmanh efficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT haleagraharanagaraja efficacyofinflammatorymarkersindiagnosinginfecteddiabeticfootulcersanddiabeticfootosteomyelitissystematicreviewandmetaanalysis