Cargando…
Effects Of Decreased Access To Outpatient Care During The Covid-19 Pandemic
INTRODUCTION: In 2020, the Covid-19 pandemic caused a decrease in access to routine healthcare. The question posed was if decreased clinic hours of an outpatient congestive heart failure (CHF) clinic affected admissions or readmissions. HYPOTHESIS: The hypothesis was that decreased hours of the CHF...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9046165/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.03.240 |
_version_ | 1784695465335324672 |
---|---|
author | Crowley, Jillian T. Devick, Katrina Delgado, Dondii |
author_facet | Crowley, Jillian T. Devick, Katrina Delgado, Dondii |
author_sort | Crowley, Jillian T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In 2020, the Covid-19 pandemic caused a decrease in access to routine healthcare. The question posed was if decreased clinic hours of an outpatient congestive heart failure (CHF) clinic affected admissions or readmissions. HYPOTHESIS: The hypothesis was that decreased hours of the CHF clinic would lead to increased hospital admissions and readmissions. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis using the Epic system slicer dicer application at an independent hospital in Phoenix, Arizona. The patient population was defined as patients seen with a heart failure diagnosis at the independent hospital.The time frames used for comparison include the years of 2019 and 2020 that were further broken down. January-March the CHF clinic operated 2 days a week in 2020, May 2020 the CHF clinic was closed and July- September 2020 the CHF clinic returned to 5 days a week. The proportion of the total patient population with at least one heart failure admission for each time period was calculated and the 2019 vs. 2020 proportions were compared using a two sample test of proportions and correspond confidence intervals.The percentage of patients readmitted for heart failure within 30 days out of the number patients who were admitted at least once were also compared for 2019 and 2020 during the time frames specified. Confidence intervals and p-values were calculated using a two sample test of proportions to determine if there was a statistically significant difference between the proportion of patients readmitted for heart failure in the years 2019 versus 2020 during the time frame specified. RESULTS: For the time periods considered, the proportions of patients admitted at least once as well as the proportion of patients readmitted were higher in 2019 compared to 2020.When the entire years of 2019 and 2020 were compared there was a 2.5% higher admission rate in 2019 compared to 2020 (p=0.003, 95% CI=[0.9%, 4.2%]) and 3.2% higher readmission rate (p=0.04, 95% CI=[0.1%, 6.3%]). January- March was compared in 2019 vs. 2020, there was a 2.5% higher admission rate in 2019 (p=0.001, 95% CI=[1.0%, 4.0%]). There was no significant statistical difference for readmissions. May of 2019 had a 1.7% higher admission rate than May of 2020 (p<0.001, 95% CI=[0.7%, 2.6%]). We observed 5.0% higher readmissions in May 2019 compared to May 2020 but was not statistically significant (p=0.31, 95% CI=[-4.5%, 14.4%]).July-September of 2019 had a 2.6% higher admission rate compared to 2020 (p<0.001, 95% CI=[1.3%, 3.9%]). The percentage of readmissions was estimated to be 3.2% higher in July- September 2019 vs 2020, but was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: In conclusion there was a decrease in admissions in 2020 vs 2019 despite decreased access. Factors to consider that may affect the outcome are travel and restaurant restrictions, as well as hesitancy to seek care during the 2020 pandemic. This may have led to care at different hospitals and more adherence to dietary restrictions at home. Improvement in guideline directed medical therapy and individual provider outreach also cannot be excluded. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9046165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90461652022-04-28 Effects Of Decreased Access To Outpatient Care During The Covid-19 Pandemic Crowley, Jillian T. Devick, Katrina Delgado, Dondii J Card Fail 236 INTRODUCTION: In 2020, the Covid-19 pandemic caused a decrease in access to routine healthcare. The question posed was if decreased clinic hours of an outpatient congestive heart failure (CHF) clinic affected admissions or readmissions. HYPOTHESIS: The hypothesis was that decreased hours of the CHF clinic would lead to increased hospital admissions and readmissions. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis using the Epic system slicer dicer application at an independent hospital in Phoenix, Arizona. The patient population was defined as patients seen with a heart failure diagnosis at the independent hospital.The time frames used for comparison include the years of 2019 and 2020 that were further broken down. January-March the CHF clinic operated 2 days a week in 2020, May 2020 the CHF clinic was closed and July- September 2020 the CHF clinic returned to 5 days a week. The proportion of the total patient population with at least one heart failure admission for each time period was calculated and the 2019 vs. 2020 proportions were compared using a two sample test of proportions and correspond confidence intervals.The percentage of patients readmitted for heart failure within 30 days out of the number patients who were admitted at least once were also compared for 2019 and 2020 during the time frames specified. Confidence intervals and p-values were calculated using a two sample test of proportions to determine if there was a statistically significant difference between the proportion of patients readmitted for heart failure in the years 2019 versus 2020 during the time frame specified. RESULTS: For the time periods considered, the proportions of patients admitted at least once as well as the proportion of patients readmitted were higher in 2019 compared to 2020.When the entire years of 2019 and 2020 were compared there was a 2.5% higher admission rate in 2019 compared to 2020 (p=0.003, 95% CI=[0.9%, 4.2%]) and 3.2% higher readmission rate (p=0.04, 95% CI=[0.1%, 6.3%]). January- March was compared in 2019 vs. 2020, there was a 2.5% higher admission rate in 2019 (p=0.001, 95% CI=[1.0%, 4.0%]). There was no significant statistical difference for readmissions. May of 2019 had a 1.7% higher admission rate than May of 2020 (p<0.001, 95% CI=[0.7%, 2.6%]). We observed 5.0% higher readmissions in May 2019 compared to May 2020 but was not statistically significant (p=0.31, 95% CI=[-4.5%, 14.4%]).July-September of 2019 had a 2.6% higher admission rate compared to 2020 (p<0.001, 95% CI=[1.3%, 3.9%]). The percentage of readmissions was estimated to be 3.2% higher in July- September 2019 vs 2020, but was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: In conclusion there was a decrease in admissions in 2020 vs 2019 despite decreased access. Factors to consider that may affect the outcome are travel and restaurant restrictions, as well as hesitancy to seek care during the 2020 pandemic. This may have led to care at different hospitals and more adherence to dietary restrictions at home. Improvement in guideline directed medical therapy and individual provider outreach also cannot be excluded. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022-04 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9046165/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.03.240 Text en Copyright © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | 236 Crowley, Jillian T. Devick, Katrina Delgado, Dondii Effects Of Decreased Access To Outpatient Care During The Covid-19 Pandemic |
title | Effects Of Decreased Access To Outpatient Care During The Covid-19 Pandemic |
title_full | Effects Of Decreased Access To Outpatient Care During The Covid-19 Pandemic |
title_fullStr | Effects Of Decreased Access To Outpatient Care During The Covid-19 Pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects Of Decreased Access To Outpatient Care During The Covid-19 Pandemic |
title_short | Effects Of Decreased Access To Outpatient Care During The Covid-19 Pandemic |
title_sort | effects of decreased access to outpatient care during the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | 236 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9046165/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.03.240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crowleyjilliant effectsofdecreasedaccesstooutpatientcareduringthecovid19pandemic AT devickkatrina effectsofdecreasedaccesstooutpatientcareduringthecovid19pandemic AT delgadodondii effectsofdecreasedaccesstooutpatientcareduringthecovid19pandemic |