Cargando…
Efficacy of electromechanical-assisted gait training on clinical walking function and gait symmetry after brain injury of stroke: a randomized controlled trial
Electromechanical-assisted gait training may be an effective intervention to promote motor recovery after brain injury. However, many studies still have difficulties in clarifying the difference between electromechanical-assisted gait training and conventional gait training. To evaluate the effectiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9046288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35477986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10889-3 |
_version_ | 1784695490736029696 |
---|---|
author | Nam, Yeon Gyo Ko, Mun Jung Bok, Soo Kyung Paik, Nam-Jong Lim, Chi-Yeon Lee, Jin Won Kwon, Bum Sun |
author_facet | Nam, Yeon Gyo Ko, Mun Jung Bok, Soo Kyung Paik, Nam-Jong Lim, Chi-Yeon Lee, Jin Won Kwon, Bum Sun |
author_sort | Nam, Yeon Gyo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Electromechanical-assisted gait training may be an effective intervention to promote motor recovery after brain injury. However, many studies still have difficulties in clarifying the difference between electromechanical-assisted gait training and conventional gait training. To evaluate the effectiveness of electromechanical-assisted gait training compared to that of conventional gait training on clinical walking function and gait symmetry of stroke patients. We randomly assigned patients with stroke (n = 144) to a control group (physical therapist-assisted gait training) and an experimental group (electromechanical gait training). Both types of gait training were done for 30 min each day, 5 days a week for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in functional ambulatory category (FAC). Secondary endpoints were clinical walking functions and gait symmetries of swing time and step length. All outcomes were measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and at 4 weeks after the baseline (post-intervention). FAC showed significant improvement after the intervention, as did clinical walking functions, in both groups. The step-length asymmetry improved in the control group, but that in the experimental group and the swing-time asymmetry in both groups did not show significant improvement. In the subgroup analysis of stroke duration of 90 days, FAC and clinical walking functions showed more significant improvement in the subacute group than in the chronic group. However, gait symmetries did not show any significant changes in either the subacute or the chronic group. Electromechanically assisted gait training by EXOWALK was as effective as conventional gait training with a physiotherapist. Although clinical walking function in the subacute group improved more than in the chronic group, gait asymmetry did not improve for either group after gait training. Trial registration: KCT0003411 Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), Republic of Korea. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9046288 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90462882022-04-29 Efficacy of electromechanical-assisted gait training on clinical walking function and gait symmetry after brain injury of stroke: a randomized controlled trial Nam, Yeon Gyo Ko, Mun Jung Bok, Soo Kyung Paik, Nam-Jong Lim, Chi-Yeon Lee, Jin Won Kwon, Bum Sun Sci Rep Article Electromechanical-assisted gait training may be an effective intervention to promote motor recovery after brain injury. However, many studies still have difficulties in clarifying the difference between electromechanical-assisted gait training and conventional gait training. To evaluate the effectiveness of electromechanical-assisted gait training compared to that of conventional gait training on clinical walking function and gait symmetry of stroke patients. We randomly assigned patients with stroke (n = 144) to a control group (physical therapist-assisted gait training) and an experimental group (electromechanical gait training). Both types of gait training were done for 30 min each day, 5 days a week for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in functional ambulatory category (FAC). Secondary endpoints were clinical walking functions and gait symmetries of swing time and step length. All outcomes were measured at baseline (pre-intervention) and at 4 weeks after the baseline (post-intervention). FAC showed significant improvement after the intervention, as did clinical walking functions, in both groups. The step-length asymmetry improved in the control group, but that in the experimental group and the swing-time asymmetry in both groups did not show significant improvement. In the subgroup analysis of stroke duration of 90 days, FAC and clinical walking functions showed more significant improvement in the subacute group than in the chronic group. However, gait symmetries did not show any significant changes in either the subacute or the chronic group. Electromechanically assisted gait training by EXOWALK was as effective as conventional gait training with a physiotherapist. Although clinical walking function in the subacute group improved more than in the chronic group, gait asymmetry did not improve for either group after gait training. Trial registration: KCT0003411 Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), Republic of Korea. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9046288/ /pubmed/35477986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10889-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Nam, Yeon Gyo Ko, Mun Jung Bok, Soo Kyung Paik, Nam-Jong Lim, Chi-Yeon Lee, Jin Won Kwon, Bum Sun Efficacy of electromechanical-assisted gait training on clinical walking function and gait symmetry after brain injury of stroke: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Efficacy of electromechanical-assisted gait training on clinical walking function and gait symmetry after brain injury of stroke: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Efficacy of electromechanical-assisted gait training on clinical walking function and gait symmetry after brain injury of stroke: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of electromechanical-assisted gait training on clinical walking function and gait symmetry after brain injury of stroke: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of electromechanical-assisted gait training on clinical walking function and gait symmetry after brain injury of stroke: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Efficacy of electromechanical-assisted gait training on clinical walking function and gait symmetry after brain injury of stroke: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | efficacy of electromechanical-assisted gait training on clinical walking function and gait symmetry after brain injury of stroke: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9046288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35477986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10889-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT namyeongyo efficacyofelectromechanicalassistedgaittrainingonclinicalwalkingfunctionandgaitsymmetryafterbraininjuryofstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT komunjung efficacyofelectromechanicalassistedgaittrainingonclinicalwalkingfunctionandgaitsymmetryafterbraininjuryofstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT boksookyung efficacyofelectromechanicalassistedgaittrainingonclinicalwalkingfunctionandgaitsymmetryafterbraininjuryofstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT paiknamjong efficacyofelectromechanicalassistedgaittrainingonclinicalwalkingfunctionandgaitsymmetryafterbraininjuryofstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT limchiyeon efficacyofelectromechanicalassistedgaittrainingonclinicalwalkingfunctionandgaitsymmetryafterbraininjuryofstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leejinwon efficacyofelectromechanicalassistedgaittrainingonclinicalwalkingfunctionandgaitsymmetryafterbraininjuryofstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kwonbumsun efficacyofelectromechanicalassistedgaittrainingonclinicalwalkingfunctionandgaitsymmetryafterbraininjuryofstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial |