Cargando…

Patient perspectives on key symptoms and preferences for follow-up after upper gastro-intestinal cancer surgery

PURPOSE: Long-lasting symptoms and reductions in quality of life are common after oesophago-gastric surgery. Post-operative follow-up has traditionally focussed on tumour recurrence and survival, but there is a growing need to also identify and treat functional sequelae to improve patients’ recovery...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pucher, Philip H., Coombes, Annie, Evans, Orla, Taylor, Joanna, Moore, Jonathan L., White, Annabelle, Lagergren, Jesper, Baker, Cara, Kelly, Mark, Gossage, James A., Dunn, Jason, Zeki, Sebastian, Byrne, Ben E., Andreyev, Jervoise, Davies, Andrew R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9046299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35275293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06922-w
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Long-lasting symptoms and reductions in quality of life are common after oesophago-gastric surgery. Post-operative follow-up has traditionally focussed on tumour recurrence and survival, but there is a growing need to also identify and treat functional sequelae to improve patients’ recovery. METHODS: An electronic survey was circulated via a British national charity for patients undergoing oesophago-gastric surgery and their families. Patients were asked about post-operative symptoms they deemed important to their quality of life, as well as satisfaction and preferences for post-operative follow-up. Differences between satisfied and dissatisfied patients with reference to follow-up were assessed. RESULTS: Among 362 respondents with a median follow-up of 58 months since surgery (range 3–412), 36 different symptoms were reported as being important to recovery and quality of life after surgery, with a median of 13 symptoms per patient. Most (84%) respondents indicated satisfaction with follow-up. Satisfied patients were more likely to have received longer follow-up (5-year or longer follow-up 60% among satisfied patients vs 27% among unsatisfied, p < 0.001). These were also less likely to have seen a dietitian as part of routine follow-up (37% vs 58%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: This patient survey highlights preferences regarding follow-up after oesophago-gastrectomy. Longer follow-up and dietician involvement improved patient satisfaction. Patients reported being concerned by a large number of gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal symptoms, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary input and a consensus on how to manage the poly-symptomatic patient. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-06922-w.