Cargando…

Predictive value of the Distress Thermometer score for risk of suicide in patients with cancer

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the association between the Distress Thermometer (DT) score and risk of suicide in patients with cancer. In addition, we aimed to determine the best cutoff score to predict patients at risk of suicide. METHODS: From 2015 to 2016, we retrospectively collected data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiang, Yung-Chih, Couper, Jeremy, Chen, Jing-Wen, Lin, Ke-Jui, Wu, Han-Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9046327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35201384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06801-4
_version_ 1784695499365810176
author Chiang, Yung-Chih
Couper, Jeremy
Chen, Jing-Wen
Lin, Ke-Jui
Wu, Han-Ping
author_facet Chiang, Yung-Chih
Couper, Jeremy
Chen, Jing-Wen
Lin, Ke-Jui
Wu, Han-Ping
author_sort Chiang, Yung-Chih
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the association between the Distress Thermometer (DT) score and risk of suicide in patients with cancer. In addition, we aimed to determine the best cutoff score to predict patients at risk of suicide. METHODS: From 2015 to 2016, we retrospectively collected data on patients with cancer. DT scores were collected, and the association between DT score and risk of suicide (suicide ideation or death ideation) was analyzed. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify the appropriate cutoff score for predicting risk of suicide. RESULTS: A total of 260 patients with cancer were included, and suicidal ideation was identified in 33 cases referred for psychological intervention. The DT scores of the patients with suicidal ideation were significantly higher than those of patients without suicidal ideation (6.30±2.11 vs. 4.29±1.72, p<0.05). In addition, the area under the ROC curve for predicting risk for suicide was 0.758. The cutoff DT score of 3 had the highest sensitivity of 1.00 to rule out suicidal ideation, while 9 had the highest specificity of 1.00 to rule in suicidal ideation. Moreover, the appropriate cutoff DT score to predict patients with suicidal ideation was 5, with a sensitivity of 0.52, specificity of .84, positive likelihood ratio of 3.24, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.58. CONCLUSION: The DT score may be a helpful clinical tool to evaluate emotional distress and risk of suicide in patients with cancer. Clinically, for DT scores greater than 5 in patients with cancer, the risk of suicide greatly increases. In view of the DT’s widespread use internationally by non-mental health clinicians in cancer to guide the need for specialist mental health interventions, its potential utility in also predicting suicide risk is of great interest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9046327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90463272022-05-07 Predictive value of the Distress Thermometer score for risk of suicide in patients with cancer Chiang, Yung-Chih Couper, Jeremy Chen, Jing-Wen Lin, Ke-Jui Wu, Han-Ping Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the association between the Distress Thermometer (DT) score and risk of suicide in patients with cancer. In addition, we aimed to determine the best cutoff score to predict patients at risk of suicide. METHODS: From 2015 to 2016, we retrospectively collected data on patients with cancer. DT scores were collected, and the association between DT score and risk of suicide (suicide ideation or death ideation) was analyzed. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify the appropriate cutoff score for predicting risk of suicide. RESULTS: A total of 260 patients with cancer were included, and suicidal ideation was identified in 33 cases referred for psychological intervention. The DT scores of the patients with suicidal ideation were significantly higher than those of patients without suicidal ideation (6.30±2.11 vs. 4.29±1.72, p<0.05). In addition, the area under the ROC curve for predicting risk for suicide was 0.758. The cutoff DT score of 3 had the highest sensitivity of 1.00 to rule out suicidal ideation, while 9 had the highest specificity of 1.00 to rule in suicidal ideation. Moreover, the appropriate cutoff DT score to predict patients with suicidal ideation was 5, with a sensitivity of 0.52, specificity of .84, positive likelihood ratio of 3.24, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.58. CONCLUSION: The DT score may be a helpful clinical tool to evaluate emotional distress and risk of suicide in patients with cancer. Clinically, for DT scores greater than 5 in patients with cancer, the risk of suicide greatly increases. In view of the DT’s widespread use internationally by non-mental health clinicians in cancer to guide the need for specialist mental health interventions, its potential utility in also predicting suicide risk is of great interest. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-02-24 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9046327/ /pubmed/35201384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06801-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Chiang, Yung-Chih
Couper, Jeremy
Chen, Jing-Wen
Lin, Ke-Jui
Wu, Han-Ping
Predictive value of the Distress Thermometer score for risk of suicide in patients with cancer
title Predictive value of the Distress Thermometer score for risk of suicide in patients with cancer
title_full Predictive value of the Distress Thermometer score for risk of suicide in patients with cancer
title_fullStr Predictive value of the Distress Thermometer score for risk of suicide in patients with cancer
title_full_unstemmed Predictive value of the Distress Thermometer score for risk of suicide in patients with cancer
title_short Predictive value of the Distress Thermometer score for risk of suicide in patients with cancer
title_sort predictive value of the distress thermometer score for risk of suicide in patients with cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9046327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35201384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06801-4
work_keys_str_mv AT chiangyungchih predictivevalueofthedistressthermometerscoreforriskofsuicideinpatientswithcancer
AT couperjeremy predictivevalueofthedistressthermometerscoreforriskofsuicideinpatientswithcancer
AT chenjingwen predictivevalueofthedistressthermometerscoreforriskofsuicideinpatientswithcancer
AT linkejui predictivevalueofthedistressthermometerscoreforriskofsuicideinpatientswithcancer
AT wuhanping predictivevalueofthedistressthermometerscoreforriskofsuicideinpatientswithcancer