Cargando…

Exercise in preventing falls for men with prostate cancer: a modelled cost-utility analysis

INTRODUCTION: Men who receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer (PCa) are a vulnerable falls population due to the side effects of treatment. The purpose of this paper is to determine the cost-effectiveness of exercise in preventing falls and fractures for this high-risk populat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edmunds, Kim, Scuffham, Paul, Newton, Robert U., Galvão, Daniel A., Tuffaha, Haitham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9046330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35201385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06900-2
_version_ 1784695500115542016
author Edmunds, Kim
Scuffham, Paul
Newton, Robert U.
Galvão, Daniel A.
Tuffaha, Haitham
author_facet Edmunds, Kim
Scuffham, Paul
Newton, Robert U.
Galvão, Daniel A.
Tuffaha, Haitham
author_sort Edmunds, Kim
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Men who receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer (PCa) are a vulnerable falls population due to the side effects of treatment. The purpose of this paper is to determine the cost-effectiveness of exercise in preventing falls and fractures for this high-risk population in Australia. METHODS: A decision analytic model was constructed to evaluate the cost utility of an exercise intervention compared to usual care from a health system perspective. The intervention comprised two 1-h sessions of supervised exercise per week over 1 year for men with non-metastatic PCa receiving curative radiation therapy and ADT. A Markov model simulated the transition between five health states: (1) at risk of falling; (2) at recurrent risk of falling; (3) fracture (minor or major); (4) non-fracture injury (minor or major); and (5) death. Model inputs including transition probabilities and utility scores were obtained from published meta-analyses, and costs were drawn from Australian data sources (e.g. Medical Benefits Schedule). The model time horizon was 3 years, and costs and effects were discounted at 5% annual rate. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were aggregated and compared between the intervention and control to calculate incremental net monetary benefit (iNMB). Uncertainty in the results was explored using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA). RESULTS: At a willingness-to-pay of AU$50,000 per QALY, the exercise intervention dominated, as it was less costly and more effective than usual care. The iNMB was $3010 per patient. The PSA showed a 58% probability the intervention was cost-effective. CONCLUSION: This is the first modelled economic evaluation of exercise for men with PCa. Our results suggest supervised exercise is cost-effective in reducing the risks of falls and fractures in this population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-06900-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9046330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90463302022-05-07 Exercise in preventing falls for men with prostate cancer: a modelled cost-utility analysis Edmunds, Kim Scuffham, Paul Newton, Robert U. Galvão, Daniel A. Tuffaha, Haitham Support Care Cancer Original Article INTRODUCTION: Men who receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer (PCa) are a vulnerable falls population due to the side effects of treatment. The purpose of this paper is to determine the cost-effectiveness of exercise in preventing falls and fractures for this high-risk population in Australia. METHODS: A decision analytic model was constructed to evaluate the cost utility of an exercise intervention compared to usual care from a health system perspective. The intervention comprised two 1-h sessions of supervised exercise per week over 1 year for men with non-metastatic PCa receiving curative radiation therapy and ADT. A Markov model simulated the transition between five health states: (1) at risk of falling; (2) at recurrent risk of falling; (3) fracture (minor or major); (4) non-fracture injury (minor or major); and (5) death. Model inputs including transition probabilities and utility scores were obtained from published meta-analyses, and costs were drawn from Australian data sources (e.g. Medical Benefits Schedule). The model time horizon was 3 years, and costs and effects were discounted at 5% annual rate. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were aggregated and compared between the intervention and control to calculate incremental net monetary benefit (iNMB). Uncertainty in the results was explored using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA). RESULTS: At a willingness-to-pay of AU$50,000 per QALY, the exercise intervention dominated, as it was less costly and more effective than usual care. The iNMB was $3010 per patient. The PSA showed a 58% probability the intervention was cost-effective. CONCLUSION: This is the first modelled economic evaluation of exercise for men with PCa. Our results suggest supervised exercise is cost-effective in reducing the risks of falls and fractures in this population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-06900-2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-02-24 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9046330/ /pubmed/35201385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06900-2 Text en © Crown 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Edmunds, Kim
Scuffham, Paul
Newton, Robert U.
Galvão, Daniel A.
Tuffaha, Haitham
Exercise in preventing falls for men with prostate cancer: a modelled cost-utility analysis
title Exercise in preventing falls for men with prostate cancer: a modelled cost-utility analysis
title_full Exercise in preventing falls for men with prostate cancer: a modelled cost-utility analysis
title_fullStr Exercise in preventing falls for men with prostate cancer: a modelled cost-utility analysis
title_full_unstemmed Exercise in preventing falls for men with prostate cancer: a modelled cost-utility analysis
title_short Exercise in preventing falls for men with prostate cancer: a modelled cost-utility analysis
title_sort exercise in preventing falls for men with prostate cancer: a modelled cost-utility analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9046330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35201385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06900-2
work_keys_str_mv AT edmundskim exerciseinpreventingfallsformenwithprostatecanceramodelledcostutilityanalysis
AT scuffhampaul exerciseinpreventingfallsformenwithprostatecanceramodelledcostutilityanalysis
AT newtonrobertu exerciseinpreventingfallsformenwithprostatecanceramodelledcostutilityanalysis
AT galvaodaniela exerciseinpreventingfallsformenwithprostatecanceramodelledcostutilityanalysis
AT tuffahahaitham exerciseinpreventingfallsformenwithprostatecanceramodelledcostutilityanalysis