Cargando…

Validation of Gazepoint low-cost eye-tracking and psychophysiology bundle

Eye-tracking and recording of physiological signals are increasingly used in research within cognitive science and human–computer interaction. For example, gaze position and measures of autonomic arousal, including pupil dilation, skin conductance (SC), and heart rate (HR), provide an indicator of c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cuve, Hélio Clemente, Stojanov, Jelka, Roberts-Gaal, Xavier, Catmur, Caroline, Bird, Geoffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9046335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34405387
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01654-x
_version_ 1784695501125320704
author Cuve, Hélio Clemente
Stojanov, Jelka
Roberts-Gaal, Xavier
Catmur, Caroline
Bird, Geoffrey
author_facet Cuve, Hélio Clemente
Stojanov, Jelka
Roberts-Gaal, Xavier
Catmur, Caroline
Bird, Geoffrey
author_sort Cuve, Hélio Clemente
collection PubMed
description Eye-tracking and recording of physiological signals are increasingly used in research within cognitive science and human–computer interaction. For example, gaze position and measures of autonomic arousal, including pupil dilation, skin conductance (SC), and heart rate (HR), provide an indicator of cognitive and physiological processes. The growing popularity of these techniques is partially driven by the emergence of low-cost recording equipment and the proliferation of open-source software for data collection and analysis of such signals. However, the use of new technology requires investigation of its reliability and validation with respect to real-world usage and against established technologies. Accordingly, in two experiments (total N = 69), we assessed the Gazepoint GP3-HD eye-tracker and Gazepoint Biometrics (GPB) system from Gazepoint. We show that the accuracy, precision, and robustness of the eye-tracker are comparable to competing systems. While fixation and saccade events can be reliably extracted, the study of saccade kinematics is affected by the low sampling rate. The GP3-HD is also able to capture psychological effects on pupil dilation in addition to the well-defined pupillary light reflex. Finally, moderate-to-strong correlations between physiological recordings and derived metrics of SC and HR between the GPB and the well-established BIOPAC MP160 support its validity. However, low amplitude of the SC signal obtained from the GPB may reduce sensitivity when separating phasic and tonic components. Similarly, data loss in pulse monitoring may pose difficulties for certain HR variability analyses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13428-021-01654-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9046335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90463352022-05-07 Validation of Gazepoint low-cost eye-tracking and psychophysiology bundle Cuve, Hélio Clemente Stojanov, Jelka Roberts-Gaal, Xavier Catmur, Caroline Bird, Geoffrey Behav Res Methods Article Eye-tracking and recording of physiological signals are increasingly used in research within cognitive science and human–computer interaction. For example, gaze position and measures of autonomic arousal, including pupil dilation, skin conductance (SC), and heart rate (HR), provide an indicator of cognitive and physiological processes. The growing popularity of these techniques is partially driven by the emergence of low-cost recording equipment and the proliferation of open-source software for data collection and analysis of such signals. However, the use of new technology requires investigation of its reliability and validation with respect to real-world usage and against established technologies. Accordingly, in two experiments (total N = 69), we assessed the Gazepoint GP3-HD eye-tracker and Gazepoint Biometrics (GPB) system from Gazepoint. We show that the accuracy, precision, and robustness of the eye-tracker are comparable to competing systems. While fixation and saccade events can be reliably extracted, the study of saccade kinematics is affected by the low sampling rate. The GP3-HD is also able to capture psychological effects on pupil dilation in addition to the well-defined pupillary light reflex. Finally, moderate-to-strong correlations between physiological recordings and derived metrics of SC and HR between the GPB and the well-established BIOPAC MP160 support its validity. However, low amplitude of the SC signal obtained from the GPB may reduce sensitivity when separating phasic and tonic components. Similarly, data loss in pulse monitoring may pose difficulties for certain HR variability analyses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13428-021-01654-x. Springer US 2021-08-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9046335/ /pubmed/34405387 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01654-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Cuve, Hélio Clemente
Stojanov, Jelka
Roberts-Gaal, Xavier
Catmur, Caroline
Bird, Geoffrey
Validation of Gazepoint low-cost eye-tracking and psychophysiology bundle
title Validation of Gazepoint low-cost eye-tracking and psychophysiology bundle
title_full Validation of Gazepoint low-cost eye-tracking and psychophysiology bundle
title_fullStr Validation of Gazepoint low-cost eye-tracking and psychophysiology bundle
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Gazepoint low-cost eye-tracking and psychophysiology bundle
title_short Validation of Gazepoint low-cost eye-tracking and psychophysiology bundle
title_sort validation of gazepoint low-cost eye-tracking and psychophysiology bundle
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9046335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34405387
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01654-x
work_keys_str_mv AT cuvehelioclemente validationofgazepointlowcosteyetrackingandpsychophysiologybundle
AT stojanovjelka validationofgazepointlowcosteyetrackingandpsychophysiologybundle
AT robertsgaalxavier validationofgazepointlowcosteyetrackingandpsychophysiologybundle
AT catmurcaroline validationofgazepointlowcosteyetrackingandpsychophysiologybundle
AT birdgeoffrey validationofgazepointlowcosteyetrackingandpsychophysiologybundle