Cargando…

Research Note: Interaction between hatching time and chick pull time affects broiler live performance

This study investigated the effects of broiler chick hatching time and pull time on subsequent live performance. Hatching eggs were obtained from commercial broiler breeder flocks of Ross 308 at 29 and 30 wk of age in trials 1 and 2, respectively. Eggs were incubated in 2 identical setters on 2 cons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dişa, R., Özlü, S., Elibol, O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9046624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101845
_version_ 1784695549716332544
author Dişa, R.
Özlü, S.
Elibol, O.
author_facet Dişa, R.
Özlü, S.
Elibol, O.
author_sort Dişa, R.
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the effects of broiler chick hatching time and pull time on subsequent live performance. Hatching eggs were obtained from commercial broiler breeder flocks of Ross 308 at 29 and 30 wk of age in trials 1 and 2, respectively. Eggs were incubated in 2 identical setters on 2 consecutive days. In both trials, portion of the eggs (9,600), incubated on the first day of set, were assigned to delayed-pull (DP) treatment, and the other portion of the eggs (9,600), incubated on the second day of set, were assigned to normal-pull (NP) treatment. The hatching period was divided into 3 hatching time groups, and chicks were classified as hatching in the early (478 to 490 h), middle (490 to 496 h), or late period (496 to 510 h of incubation). At 510 h of incubation based on the NP set date, all chicks were transferred to a broiler research house. A total of 7,200 and 8,400 chicks within 2 chick pull time treatments × 3 hatching time groups were raised in trials 1 and 2, respectively. The primary difference between the DP and NP treatments was an additional 24 h holding period in the hatcher for the DP group. Therefore, chick BW was higher at placement in the NP treatment than in the DP treatment (P < 0.001). However, this advantage disappeared by 7 d, and the average BW did not differ between the DP and NP treatments at 41 d. Chick pull time did not affect feed consumption or feed conversion ratio (FCR) at 41 d. Similar to pull time, hatching time did not impact BW, feed consumption or FCR at 41 d. However, for mortality and European Production Efficiency Index (EPEI) at 41 d, a hatching time × pull time interaction was observed (P < 0.001). Mortality was higher and EPEI was lower in late hatch chicks than in chicks hatched early and middle in the NP treatment, whereas for chicks in the DP treatment, mortality and EPEI did not differ among the hatching time groups. These data indicated that the DP treatment, which held the chicks for an additional 24 h in the hatcher under optimum conditions, produced a lower initial BW accompanied by a period of compensatory weight gain through 41 d, and no differences (P > 0.05) in live performance occurred due to the holding time in the hatcher. Overall, sending the late hatched chicks to the broiler house shortly after hatching increased their mortality and negatively affected their live performance (as measured by EPEI), unlike holding early hatched chicks for a relatively long time after hatching (50 h) in the hatcher.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9046624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90466242022-04-29 Research Note: Interaction between hatching time and chick pull time affects broiler live performance Dişa, R. Özlü, S. Elibol, O. Poult Sci MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION This study investigated the effects of broiler chick hatching time and pull time on subsequent live performance. Hatching eggs were obtained from commercial broiler breeder flocks of Ross 308 at 29 and 30 wk of age in trials 1 and 2, respectively. Eggs were incubated in 2 identical setters on 2 consecutive days. In both trials, portion of the eggs (9,600), incubated on the first day of set, were assigned to delayed-pull (DP) treatment, and the other portion of the eggs (9,600), incubated on the second day of set, were assigned to normal-pull (NP) treatment. The hatching period was divided into 3 hatching time groups, and chicks were classified as hatching in the early (478 to 490 h), middle (490 to 496 h), or late period (496 to 510 h of incubation). At 510 h of incubation based on the NP set date, all chicks were transferred to a broiler research house. A total of 7,200 and 8,400 chicks within 2 chick pull time treatments × 3 hatching time groups were raised in trials 1 and 2, respectively. The primary difference between the DP and NP treatments was an additional 24 h holding period in the hatcher for the DP group. Therefore, chick BW was higher at placement in the NP treatment than in the DP treatment (P < 0.001). However, this advantage disappeared by 7 d, and the average BW did not differ between the DP and NP treatments at 41 d. Chick pull time did not affect feed consumption or feed conversion ratio (FCR) at 41 d. Similar to pull time, hatching time did not impact BW, feed consumption or FCR at 41 d. However, for mortality and European Production Efficiency Index (EPEI) at 41 d, a hatching time × pull time interaction was observed (P < 0.001). Mortality was higher and EPEI was lower in late hatch chicks than in chicks hatched early and middle in the NP treatment, whereas for chicks in the DP treatment, mortality and EPEI did not differ among the hatching time groups. These data indicated that the DP treatment, which held the chicks for an additional 24 h in the hatcher under optimum conditions, produced a lower initial BW accompanied by a period of compensatory weight gain through 41 d, and no differences (P > 0.05) in live performance occurred due to the holding time in the hatcher. Overall, sending the late hatched chicks to the broiler house shortly after hatching increased their mortality and negatively affected their live performance (as measured by EPEI), unlike holding early hatched chicks for a relatively long time after hatching (50 h) in the hatcher. Elsevier 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9046624/ /pubmed/35468425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101845 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION
Dişa, R.
Özlü, S.
Elibol, O.
Research Note: Interaction between hatching time and chick pull time affects broiler live performance
title Research Note: Interaction between hatching time and chick pull time affects broiler live performance
title_full Research Note: Interaction between hatching time and chick pull time affects broiler live performance
title_fullStr Research Note: Interaction between hatching time and chick pull time affects broiler live performance
title_full_unstemmed Research Note: Interaction between hatching time and chick pull time affects broiler live performance
title_short Research Note: Interaction between hatching time and chick pull time affects broiler live performance
title_sort research note: interaction between hatching time and chick pull time affects broiler live performance
topic MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9046624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101845
work_keys_str_mv AT disar researchnoteinteractionbetweenhatchingtimeandchickpulltimeaffectsbroilerliveperformance
AT ozlus researchnoteinteractionbetweenhatchingtimeandchickpulltimeaffectsbroilerliveperformance
AT elibolo researchnoteinteractionbetweenhatchingtimeandchickpulltimeaffectsbroilerliveperformance