Cargando…

Internet-delivered cognitive therapy for social anxiety disorder in Hong Kong: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Research is needed to determine the extent to which internet-delivered psychological therapies are effective when delivered in countries and cultures outside of where they were developed. OBJECTIVE: This waitlist-controlled study evaluated the efficacy of a UK-developed, therapist-guided...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thew, Graham R., Kwok, Amy P.L., Lissillour Chan, Mandy H., Powell, Candice L.Y.M., Wild, Jennifer, Leung, Patrick W.L., Clark, David M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9046639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35493437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2022.100539
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Research is needed to determine the extent to which internet-delivered psychological therapies are effective when delivered in countries and cultures outside of where they were developed. OBJECTIVE: This waitlist-controlled study evaluated the efficacy of a UK-developed, therapist-guided internet Cognitive Therapy programme for Social Anxiety Disorder (iCT-SAD) when delivered in Hong Kong by local therapists. METHODS: Patients were randomized to iCT-SAD (n = 22) or a waitlist control group (n = 22). Assessments took place at weeks 0, 8, and 15 (posttreatment/postwait), with a further 3-month follow-up assessment for the iCT-SAD group. The primary outcome measure was the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (self-report), and posttreatment/postwait diagnostic assessments were completed by independent assessors blind to condition. Trial Registration: ISRCTN11357117. RESULTS: Compared with the waitlist group, iCT-SAD significantly reduced social anxiety symptoms (adjusted difference at posttreatment 55.36, 95%CI 44.32 to 66.39, p < 0.001; d(Cohen) 2.41). The treatment was also superior to waitlist on all secondary outcome measures. 86% of the iCT-SAD group demonstrated remission from SAD based on the LSAS, compared to 5% of the waitlist group. 73% no longer met diagnostic criteria at posttreatment, compared to 9% of the waitlist group. The gains made by the iCT-SAD group were maintained at three-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: iCT-SAD showed strong efficacy for the treatment of SAD in Hong Kong. As the clinical outcomes were similar to UK studies, this suggests the dissemination of the treatment into a different cultural setting did not result in a substantial loss of efficacy.