Cargando…
Implementation challenges to patient safety in Guatemala: a mixed methods evaluation
BACKGROUND: Little is known about factors affecting implementation of patient safety programmes in low and middle-income countries. The goal of our study was to evaluate the implementation of a patient safety programme for paediatric care in Guatemala. METHODS: We used a mixed methods design to exam...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9046830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34039747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012552 |
_version_ | 1784695599328657408 |
---|---|
author | Hall, Bria J Puente, Melany Aguilar, Angie Sico, Isabelle Orozco Barrios, Monica Mendez, Sindy Baumgartner, Joy Noel Boyd, David Calgua, Erwin Lou-Meda, Randall Ramirez, Carla C Diez, Ana Tello, Astrid Sexton, J Bryan Rice, Henry |
author_facet | Hall, Bria J Puente, Melany Aguilar, Angie Sico, Isabelle Orozco Barrios, Monica Mendez, Sindy Baumgartner, Joy Noel Boyd, David Calgua, Erwin Lou-Meda, Randall Ramirez, Carla C Diez, Ana Tello, Astrid Sexton, J Bryan Rice, Henry |
author_sort | Hall, Bria J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Little is known about factors affecting implementation of patient safety programmes in low and middle-income countries. The goal of our study was to evaluate the implementation of a patient safety programme for paediatric care in Guatemala. METHODS: We used a mixed methods design to examine the implementation of a patient safety programme across 11 paediatric units at the Roosevelt Hospital in Guatemala. The safety programme included: (1) tools to measure and foster safety culture, (2) education of patient safety, (3) local leadership engagement, (4) safety event reporting systems, and (5) quality improvement interventions. Key informant staff (n=82) participated in qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys to identify implementation challenges early during programme deployment from May to July 2018, with follow-up focus group discussions in two units 1 year later to identify opportunities for programme modification. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, and integrated using triangulation, complementarity and expansion to identify emerging themes using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Salience levels were reported according to coding frequency, with valence levels measured to characterise the degree to which each construct impacted implementation. RESULTS: We found several facilitators to safety programme implementation, including high staff receptivity, orientation towards patient-centredness and a desire for protocols. Key barriers included competing clinical demands, lack of knowledge about patient safety, limited governance, human factors and poor organisational incentives. Modifications included use of tools for staff recognition, integration of education into error reporting mechanisms and designation of trained champions to lead unit-based safety interventions. CONCLUSION: Implementation of safety programmes in low-resource settings requires recognition of facilitators such as staff receptivity and patient-centredness as well as barriers such as lack of training in patient safety and poor organisational incentives. Embedding an implementation analysis during programme deployment allows for programme modification to enhance successful implementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9046830 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90468302022-05-11 Implementation challenges to patient safety in Guatemala: a mixed methods evaluation Hall, Bria J Puente, Melany Aguilar, Angie Sico, Isabelle Orozco Barrios, Monica Mendez, Sindy Baumgartner, Joy Noel Boyd, David Calgua, Erwin Lou-Meda, Randall Ramirez, Carla C Diez, Ana Tello, Astrid Sexton, J Bryan Rice, Henry BMJ Qual Saf Original Research BACKGROUND: Little is known about factors affecting implementation of patient safety programmes in low and middle-income countries. The goal of our study was to evaluate the implementation of a patient safety programme for paediatric care in Guatemala. METHODS: We used a mixed methods design to examine the implementation of a patient safety programme across 11 paediatric units at the Roosevelt Hospital in Guatemala. The safety programme included: (1) tools to measure and foster safety culture, (2) education of patient safety, (3) local leadership engagement, (4) safety event reporting systems, and (5) quality improvement interventions. Key informant staff (n=82) participated in qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys to identify implementation challenges early during programme deployment from May to July 2018, with follow-up focus group discussions in two units 1 year later to identify opportunities for programme modification. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, and integrated using triangulation, complementarity and expansion to identify emerging themes using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Salience levels were reported according to coding frequency, with valence levels measured to characterise the degree to which each construct impacted implementation. RESULTS: We found several facilitators to safety programme implementation, including high staff receptivity, orientation towards patient-centredness and a desire for protocols. Key barriers included competing clinical demands, lack of knowledge about patient safety, limited governance, human factors and poor organisational incentives. Modifications included use of tools for staff recognition, integration of education into error reporting mechanisms and designation of trained champions to lead unit-based safety interventions. CONCLUSION: Implementation of safety programmes in low-resource settings requires recognition of facilitators such as staff receptivity and patient-centredness as well as barriers such as lack of training in patient safety and poor organisational incentives. Embedding an implementation analysis during programme deployment allows for programme modification to enhance successful implementation. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9046830/ /pubmed/34039747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012552 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hall, Bria J Puente, Melany Aguilar, Angie Sico, Isabelle Orozco Barrios, Monica Mendez, Sindy Baumgartner, Joy Noel Boyd, David Calgua, Erwin Lou-Meda, Randall Ramirez, Carla C Diez, Ana Tello, Astrid Sexton, J Bryan Rice, Henry Implementation challenges to patient safety in Guatemala: a mixed methods evaluation |
title | Implementation challenges to patient safety in Guatemala: a mixed methods evaluation |
title_full | Implementation challenges to patient safety in Guatemala: a mixed methods evaluation |
title_fullStr | Implementation challenges to patient safety in Guatemala: a mixed methods evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation challenges to patient safety in Guatemala: a mixed methods evaluation |
title_short | Implementation challenges to patient safety in Guatemala: a mixed methods evaluation |
title_sort | implementation challenges to patient safety in guatemala: a mixed methods evaluation |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9046830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34039747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012552 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hallbriaj implementationchallengestopatientsafetyinguatemalaamixedmethodsevaluation AT puentemelany implementationchallengestopatientsafetyinguatemalaamixedmethodsevaluation AT aguilarangie implementationchallengestopatientsafetyinguatemalaamixedmethodsevaluation AT sicoisabelle implementationchallengestopatientsafetyinguatemalaamixedmethodsevaluation AT orozcobarriosmonica implementationchallengestopatientsafetyinguatemalaamixedmethodsevaluation AT mendezsindy implementationchallengestopatientsafetyinguatemalaamixedmethodsevaluation AT baumgartnerjoynoel implementationchallengestopatientsafetyinguatemalaamixedmethodsevaluation AT boyddavid implementationchallengestopatientsafetyinguatemalaamixedmethodsevaluation AT calguaerwin implementationchallengestopatientsafetyinguatemalaamixedmethodsevaluation AT loumedarandall implementationchallengestopatientsafetyinguatemalaamixedmethodsevaluation AT ramirezcarlac implementationchallengestopatientsafetyinguatemalaamixedmethodsevaluation AT diezana implementationchallengestopatientsafetyinguatemalaamixedmethodsevaluation AT telloastrid implementationchallengestopatientsafetyinguatemalaamixedmethodsevaluation AT sextonjbryan implementationchallengestopatientsafetyinguatemalaamixedmethodsevaluation AT ricehenry implementationchallengestopatientsafetyinguatemalaamixedmethodsevaluation |