Cargando…

Discussion on the Treatment Strategy for Stage ⅡA1 Cervical Cancer (FIGO 2018)

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the best treatment strategy for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IIA1 cervical cancer patients by comparing the survival outcomes of two treatment methods: abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) with standard postoperative t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Chen, Xiaolin, Liang, Wentong, Duan, Hui, Wu, Minling, Zhan, Xuemei, Dai, Encheng, Lv, Qiubo, Xie, Qinghuang, Liu, Ruilei, Xu, Yan, Bin, Xiaonong, Lang, Jinghe, Liu, Ping, Chen, Chunlin
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:	Oncology
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9046906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35494051 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.800049

Ejemplares similares

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for 2018 FIGO stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1 cervical cancer: a large multicenter study
por: Chen, Xiaolin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study
por: Li, Zhiqiang, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of the Oncological Outcomes Between Robot-Assisted and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Based on the New FIGO 2018 Staging System: A Multicentre Retrospective Study
por: Li, Pengfei, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Rationality of FIGO 2018 IIIC restaging of cervical cancer according to local tumor size: A cohort study
por: Duan, Hui, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Initial treatment for FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer based on histological type: A 14‐year multicenter study
por: Ye, Yanna, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Treatment of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer with different local tumor factors
por: Ye, Yanna, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Survival Outcomes of Patients With Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer Who Undergo Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy Versus Radiochemotherapy
por: Li, Zhiqiang, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of survival outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix after radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy
por: Liu, Ping, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reviewing FIGO 2018 cervical cancer staging
por: Soares, Leila Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Critical analysis of the FIGO 2018 cervical cancer staging
por: Soares, Leila Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Hazard Ratio Analysis of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for IA1 With LVSI-IIA2 Cervical Cancer: Identifying the Possible Contraindications of Laparoscopic Surgery for Cervical Cancer
por: Li, Pengfei, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer patients with surgical risk factors
por: Yan, Ding-Ding, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Survival After Abdominal Q-M Type B versus C2 Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
por: Chen, Chunlin, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparison of survival outcomes between radio-chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy with postoperative standard therapy in patients with stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: long-term oncological outcome analysis in 37 Chinese hospitals
por: Liu, Ping, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Validation of the 2018 FIGO Staging System for Predicting the Prognosis of Patients With Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer
por: Long, Xingtao, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Nomogram Predicting Overall Survival in Patients with FIGO II to III Squamous Cell Cervical Carcinoma Under Radical Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis Based on 2018 FIGO Staging
por: Zang, Lele, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of survival outcomes with or without Para-aortic lymphadenectomy in surgical patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer in China from 2004 to 2016
por: Chen, Chunlin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Impact of different post-operative treatment modalities on long-term outcomes in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IIICp cervical cancer
por: Soochit, Ashvin, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System
por: Liu, Xiaoliang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Factors of 2018 FIGO Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer: A Review
por: Qin, Fengying, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Nomograms Predicting Survival of Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Based on the 2018 FIGO Staging System
por: Meng, Qingyu, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effect of annualized surgeon volume on major surgical complications for abdominal and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in China, 2004–2016: a retrospective cohort study
por: Liang, Cong, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

자궁경부암: 개정된 2018 FIGO 병기와 자기공명영상을 중심으로
Publicado: (2021)

Validation of the 2018 FIGO Staging System of Cervical Cancer for Stage III Patients with a Cohort from China
por: Liu, Xiaoliang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A comprehensive analysis of the factors of positive pelvic lymph nodes on survival of cervical cancer patients with 2018 FIGO stage IIIC1p
por: Yan, Ding-Ding, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Interobserver agreement and prognostic impact for MRI–based 2018 FIGO staging parameters in uterine cervical cancer
por: Wagner-Larsen, Kari S., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Data from small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: FIGO 2018 staging is more accurate than FIGO 2009
por: Zhang, Yunqiang, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Diagnostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/MRI for Revised 2018 FIGO Staging in Patients with Cervical Cancer
por: Tsuyoshi, Hideaki, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Validation of the 2018 FIGO Classification for Cervical Cancer: Lymphovascular Space Invasion Should Be Considered in IB1 Stage
por: Balaya, Vincent, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The risk of lymph node metastasis in the new FIGO 2018 stage IA cervical cancer with >7 mm diameter
por: Nicolai, Laure, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Implications of the revised cervical cancer FIGO staging system
por: Bhatla, Neerja, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Significance of histology and nodal status on the survival of women with early-stage cervical cancer: validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system
por: Machida, Hiroko, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

FIGO Stage IV and Age Over 55 Years as Prognostic Predicators in Patients With Metastatic Malignant Struma Ovarii
por: Li, Sijian, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Effect of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Surgical Volume on Oncology Outcomes in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
por: Li, Pengfei, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Multidisciplinary perspectives on newly revised 2018 FIGO staging of cancer of the cervix uteri
por: Berek, Jonathan S., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Should the Number of Metastatic Pelvic Lymph Nodes Be Integrated into the 2018 Figo Staging Classification of Early Stage Cervical Cancer?
por: Pedone Anchora, Luigi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

FIGO 2018 Staging for Cervical Cancer: Influence on Stage Distribution and Outcomes in the 3D-Image-Guided Brachytherapy Era
por: Tomizawa, Kento, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Influence of New FIGO 2018 Staging on Treatment Outcomes in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Single-Center Study
por: Kaur, Satinder, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Association of preoperative conization with recurrences after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for FIGO 2018 stage IB1 cervical cancer
por: Ding, Yan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 and tumor size <2 cm cervical cancer with visible or invisible tumors: a multicentre retrospective study
por: Li, Pengfei, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_kir0lbt4ddah0bh44hbvhu2l1e