Cargando…
Comparative Effectiveness of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines Against the Delta Variant
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data regarding how the Delta variant of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has impacted the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech), mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson–Janssen) vaccines at preventing severe acute respiratory syndrome c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35137006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac106 |
_version_ | 1784695673022578688 |
---|---|
author | Risk, Malcolm Shen, Chen Hayek, Salim S Holevinski, Lynn Schiopu, Elena Freed, Gary Akin, Cem Zhao, Lili |
author_facet | Risk, Malcolm Shen, Chen Hayek, Salim S Holevinski, Lynn Schiopu, Elena Freed, Gary Akin, Cem Zhao, Lili |
author_sort | Risk, Malcolm |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data regarding how the Delta variant of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has impacted the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech), mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson–Janssen) vaccines at preventing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and COVID-19 hospitalization. METHODS: We compared the effectiveness of the three vaccines during the pre- and post-Delta variant period (before and after 1 July 2021) in a large cohort of vaccinated and unvaccinated patients in the Michigan Medicine healthcare system. We assessed vaccine effectiveness (VE) using 2 analyses: an inverse propensity weighted (IPW) Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis based on time from vaccination, and a Cox model based on calendar time with vaccination as a time-varying covariate. RESULTS: Compared to Ad26.COV2.S recipients, the risk of hospitalization for COVID-19 in the post-Delta variant period was lower for BNT162b2 recipients (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [.14–.98]; P = .05) and mRNA-1273 recipients (HR = 0.21; 95% CI: [.07–.64]; P = .006). Recipients of the mRNA-1273 vaccine had a lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection than Ad26.COV2.S recipients (HR = 0.6; 95% CI: [.43–.83]; P = .003) and BNT162b2 recipients (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: [.54–.76]; P < .001). After 1 July, efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 infection declined for Ad26.COV2.S recipients (VE = 76% before; VE = 49% after; P = .02), BNT162b2 recipients (VE = 87% before; VE = 52% after; P < .001), and mRNA-1273 recipients (VE = 92% before; VE = 70% after; P < .001). Waning immunity and the Delta variant contributed independently and significantly to this decline. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is a substantial decline in effectiveness, the approved COVID-19 vaccines remain effective against infection and hospitalization due to the Delta variant. The mRNA-based vaccines are more effective than the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9047165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90471652022-04-28 Comparative Effectiveness of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines Against the Delta Variant Risk, Malcolm Shen, Chen Hayek, Salim S Holevinski, Lynn Schiopu, Elena Freed, Gary Akin, Cem Zhao, Lili Clin Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data regarding how the Delta variant of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has impacted the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech), mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson–Janssen) vaccines at preventing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and COVID-19 hospitalization. METHODS: We compared the effectiveness of the three vaccines during the pre- and post-Delta variant period (before and after 1 July 2021) in a large cohort of vaccinated and unvaccinated patients in the Michigan Medicine healthcare system. We assessed vaccine effectiveness (VE) using 2 analyses: an inverse propensity weighted (IPW) Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis based on time from vaccination, and a Cox model based on calendar time with vaccination as a time-varying covariate. RESULTS: Compared to Ad26.COV2.S recipients, the risk of hospitalization for COVID-19 in the post-Delta variant period was lower for BNT162b2 recipients (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [.14–.98]; P = .05) and mRNA-1273 recipients (HR = 0.21; 95% CI: [.07–.64]; P = .006). Recipients of the mRNA-1273 vaccine had a lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection than Ad26.COV2.S recipients (HR = 0.6; 95% CI: [.43–.83]; P = .003) and BNT162b2 recipients (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: [.54–.76]; P < .001). After 1 July, efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 infection declined for Ad26.COV2.S recipients (VE = 76% before; VE = 49% after; P = .02), BNT162b2 recipients (VE = 87% before; VE = 52% after; P < .001), and mRNA-1273 recipients (VE = 92% before; VE = 70% after; P < .001). Waning immunity and the Delta variant contributed independently and significantly to this decline. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is a substantial decline in effectiveness, the approved COVID-19 vaccines remain effective against infection and hospitalization due to the Delta variant. The mRNA-based vaccines are more effective than the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine. Oxford University Press 2022-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9047165/ /pubmed/35137006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac106 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_modelThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) |
spellingShingle | Major Article Risk, Malcolm Shen, Chen Hayek, Salim S Holevinski, Lynn Schiopu, Elena Freed, Gary Akin, Cem Zhao, Lili Comparative Effectiveness of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines Against the Delta Variant |
title | Comparative Effectiveness of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines Against the Delta Variant |
title_full | Comparative Effectiveness of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines Against the Delta Variant |
title_fullStr | Comparative Effectiveness of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines Against the Delta Variant |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Effectiveness of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines Against the Delta Variant |
title_short | Comparative Effectiveness of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines Against the Delta Variant |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) vaccines against the delta variant |
topic | Major Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35137006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac106 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riskmalcolm comparativeeffectivenessofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19vaccinesagainstthedeltavariant AT shenchen comparativeeffectivenessofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19vaccinesagainstthedeltavariant AT hayeksalims comparativeeffectivenessofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19vaccinesagainstthedeltavariant AT holevinskilynn comparativeeffectivenessofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19vaccinesagainstthedeltavariant AT schiopuelena comparativeeffectivenessofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19vaccinesagainstthedeltavariant AT freedgary comparativeeffectivenessofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19vaccinesagainstthedeltavariant AT akincem comparativeeffectivenessofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19vaccinesagainstthedeltavariant AT zhaolili comparativeeffectivenessofcoronavirusdisease2019covid19vaccinesagainstthedeltavariant |