Cargando…
Population-Based Assessment of Contact Tracing Operations for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Finland
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic overwhelmed local contact tracing (CT) efforts in many countries. In Finland, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 incidence and mortality were among the lowest in Europe during 2020–2021. We evaluated CT efficiency, effectivene...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35791357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac214 |
_version_ | 1784695680433913856 |
---|---|
author | Rannikko, Juha Viskari, Hanna Sirkeoja, Simo Tamminen, Pekka Kaila, Ville Ala-Mursula, Anni Huttunen, Reetta Laine, Janne Syrjänen, Jaana Nuorti, J Pekka |
author_facet | Rannikko, Juha Viskari, Hanna Sirkeoja, Simo Tamminen, Pekka Kaila, Ville Ala-Mursula, Anni Huttunen, Reetta Laine, Janne Syrjänen, Jaana Nuorti, J Pekka |
author_sort | Rannikko, Juha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic overwhelmed local contact tracing (CT) efforts in many countries. In Finland, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 incidence and mortality were among the lowest in Europe during 2020–2021. We evaluated CT efficiency, effectiveness, and transmission settings. METHODS: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test–positive COVID-19 cases and high-risk contacts in the population-based CT database of Pirkanmaa Hospital District (population 540 000) during June 2020–May 2021 were interviewed. RESULTS: Altogether 353 926 PCR tests yielded 4739 (1.3%) confirmed cases (average 14-day case notification rate, 34 per 100 000 population); about 99% of confirmed cases and high-risk contacts were reached by a CT team. Of 26 881 high-risk contacts who were placed in quarantine, 2275 subsequently tested positive (48% of new cases), 825 (17%) had been in quarantine ≥48 hours before symptoms, and 3469 (77%) of locally acquired cases were part of transmission chains with an identified setting. The highest secondary attack rates were seen in households (31%), healthcare patients (18%), and private functions (10%). Among the 311 hospitalized patients, COVID-19 diagnosis or exposure was known in 273 (88%) before emergency room admission (identified patients). Healthcare workers had the highest proportion of work-related infections (159 cases [35%]). The source of infection was classifiable in 65% and was most commonly a coworker (64 cases [62%]). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate the role of effective testing and CT implementation during the cluster phase of COVID-19 spread. Although half of newly diagnosed cases were already in quarantine, targeted public health measures were needed to control transmission. CT effectiveness during widespread community transmission should be assessed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9047225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90472252022-04-28 Population-Based Assessment of Contact Tracing Operations for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Finland Rannikko, Juha Viskari, Hanna Sirkeoja, Simo Tamminen, Pekka Kaila, Ville Ala-Mursula, Anni Huttunen, Reetta Laine, Janne Syrjänen, Jaana Nuorti, J Pekka Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic overwhelmed local contact tracing (CT) efforts in many countries. In Finland, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 incidence and mortality were among the lowest in Europe during 2020–2021. We evaluated CT efficiency, effectiveness, and transmission settings. METHODS: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test–positive COVID-19 cases and high-risk contacts in the population-based CT database of Pirkanmaa Hospital District (population 540 000) during June 2020–May 2021 were interviewed. RESULTS: Altogether 353 926 PCR tests yielded 4739 (1.3%) confirmed cases (average 14-day case notification rate, 34 per 100 000 population); about 99% of confirmed cases and high-risk contacts were reached by a CT team. Of 26 881 high-risk contacts who were placed in quarantine, 2275 subsequently tested positive (48% of new cases), 825 (17%) had been in quarantine ≥48 hours before symptoms, and 3469 (77%) of locally acquired cases were part of transmission chains with an identified setting. The highest secondary attack rates were seen in households (31%), healthcare patients (18%), and private functions (10%). Among the 311 hospitalized patients, COVID-19 diagnosis or exposure was known in 273 (88%) before emergency room admission (identified patients). Healthcare workers had the highest proportion of work-related infections (159 cases [35%]). The source of infection was classifiable in 65% and was most commonly a coworker (64 cases [62%]). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate the role of effective testing and CT implementation during the cluster phase of COVID-19 spread. Although half of newly diagnosed cases were already in quarantine, targeted public health measures were needed to control transmission. CT effectiveness during widespread community transmission should be assessed. Oxford University Press 2022-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9047225/ /pubmed/35791357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac214 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Major Article Rannikko, Juha Viskari, Hanna Sirkeoja, Simo Tamminen, Pekka Kaila, Ville Ala-Mursula, Anni Huttunen, Reetta Laine, Janne Syrjänen, Jaana Nuorti, J Pekka Population-Based Assessment of Contact Tracing Operations for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Finland |
title | Population-Based Assessment of Contact Tracing Operations for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Finland |
title_full | Population-Based Assessment of Contact Tracing Operations for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Finland |
title_fullStr | Population-Based Assessment of Contact Tracing Operations for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Finland |
title_full_unstemmed | Population-Based Assessment of Contact Tracing Operations for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Finland |
title_short | Population-Based Assessment of Contact Tracing Operations for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Finland |
title_sort | population-based assessment of contact tracing operations for coronavirus disease 2019 in pirkanmaa hospital district, finland |
topic | Major Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35791357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac214 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rannikkojuha populationbasedassessmentofcontacttracingoperationsforcoronavirusdisease2019inpirkanmaahospitaldistrictfinland AT viskarihanna populationbasedassessmentofcontacttracingoperationsforcoronavirusdisease2019inpirkanmaahospitaldistrictfinland AT sirkeojasimo populationbasedassessmentofcontacttracingoperationsforcoronavirusdisease2019inpirkanmaahospitaldistrictfinland AT tamminenpekka populationbasedassessmentofcontacttracingoperationsforcoronavirusdisease2019inpirkanmaahospitaldistrictfinland AT kailaville populationbasedassessmentofcontacttracingoperationsforcoronavirusdisease2019inpirkanmaahospitaldistrictfinland AT alamursulaanni populationbasedassessmentofcontacttracingoperationsforcoronavirusdisease2019inpirkanmaahospitaldistrictfinland AT huttunenreetta populationbasedassessmentofcontacttracingoperationsforcoronavirusdisease2019inpirkanmaahospitaldistrictfinland AT lainejanne populationbasedassessmentofcontacttracingoperationsforcoronavirusdisease2019inpirkanmaahospitaldistrictfinland AT syrjanenjaana populationbasedassessmentofcontacttracingoperationsforcoronavirusdisease2019inpirkanmaahospitaldistrictfinland AT nuortijpekka populationbasedassessmentofcontacttracingoperationsforcoronavirusdisease2019inpirkanmaahospitaldistrictfinland |