Cargando…

Antimicrobial use in lactating sows, piglets, nursery, and grower-finisher pigs on swine farms in Ontario, Canada during 2017 and 2018

BACKGROUND: Data on antimicrobial use (AMU) in pig production are needed for the development of good antimicrobial stewardship practices to reduce the risk of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria that can cause illness in animals and humans. In Canada, there is a lack of quantitative data on AMU in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bosman, Angelina L., Deckert, Anne E., Carson, Carolee A., Poljak, Zvonimir, Reid-Smith, Richard J., McEwen, Scott A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35484556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-022-00259-w
_version_ 1784695686392971264
author Bosman, Angelina L.
Deckert, Anne E.
Carson, Carolee A.
Poljak, Zvonimir
Reid-Smith, Richard J.
McEwen, Scott A.
author_facet Bosman, Angelina L.
Deckert, Anne E.
Carson, Carolee A.
Poljak, Zvonimir
Reid-Smith, Richard J.
McEwen, Scott A.
author_sort Bosman, Angelina L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Data on antimicrobial use (AMU) in pig production are needed for the development of good antimicrobial stewardship practices to reduce the risk of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria that can cause illness in animals and humans. In Canada, there is a lack of quantitative data on AMU in the farrowing and nursery stages of pig production. This study aimed to determine which antimicrobial active ingredients are currently used in farrowing, nursery, and grower-finisher herds in the province of Ontario, Canada, and to quantify AMU using various metrics. We collected data on herd demographics, biosecurity, health status, and AMU during one production cycle from 25 farrowing and 25 nursery herds in Ontario, between May 2017 and April 2018, and obtained data from 23 Ontario grower-finisher herds during the same time frame from the Public Health Agency’s Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance. We applied frequency measures, and weight-, and dose-based metrics to the data. RESULTS: In all pigs, the highest quantity of AMU was administered in-feed. By all routes of administration and compared to other production stages, nursery pigs used more antimicrobials in mg/kg biomass and the number of Canadian defined daily doses per 1000 pig-days (dose(CA) rate), while grower-finisher pigs used more antimicrobials in total kilograms and the number of Canadian defined daily doses per pig. In suckling pigs in some herds, there was routine disease prevention use of ceftiofur, an antimicrobial active ingredient categorized as very highly important in human medicine by Health Canada. The top antimicrobial used in each stage of pig production often varied by the metric used. There was producer-reported growth promotion use of antimicrobials in suckling and grower-finisher feed. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide a current picture of AMU in pigs in Ontario and can be used as a basis for further research on AMU in farrowing and nursery herds in Canada. Our findings confirm that it would be useful to include farrowing and nursery herds in routine AMU surveillance in Canada. A future analysis using data from this project will examine factors that affect the quantity of AMU. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40813-022-00259-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9047262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90472622022-04-29 Antimicrobial use in lactating sows, piglets, nursery, and grower-finisher pigs on swine farms in Ontario, Canada during 2017 and 2018 Bosman, Angelina L. Deckert, Anne E. Carson, Carolee A. Poljak, Zvonimir Reid-Smith, Richard J. McEwen, Scott A. Porcine Health Manag Research BACKGROUND: Data on antimicrobial use (AMU) in pig production are needed for the development of good antimicrobial stewardship practices to reduce the risk of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria that can cause illness in animals and humans. In Canada, there is a lack of quantitative data on AMU in the farrowing and nursery stages of pig production. This study aimed to determine which antimicrobial active ingredients are currently used in farrowing, nursery, and grower-finisher herds in the province of Ontario, Canada, and to quantify AMU using various metrics. We collected data on herd demographics, biosecurity, health status, and AMU during one production cycle from 25 farrowing and 25 nursery herds in Ontario, between May 2017 and April 2018, and obtained data from 23 Ontario grower-finisher herds during the same time frame from the Public Health Agency’s Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance. We applied frequency measures, and weight-, and dose-based metrics to the data. RESULTS: In all pigs, the highest quantity of AMU was administered in-feed. By all routes of administration and compared to other production stages, nursery pigs used more antimicrobials in mg/kg biomass and the number of Canadian defined daily doses per 1000 pig-days (dose(CA) rate), while grower-finisher pigs used more antimicrobials in total kilograms and the number of Canadian defined daily doses per pig. In suckling pigs in some herds, there was routine disease prevention use of ceftiofur, an antimicrobial active ingredient categorized as very highly important in human medicine by Health Canada. The top antimicrobial used in each stage of pig production often varied by the metric used. There was producer-reported growth promotion use of antimicrobials in suckling and grower-finisher feed. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide a current picture of AMU in pigs in Ontario and can be used as a basis for further research on AMU in farrowing and nursery herds in Canada. Our findings confirm that it would be useful to include farrowing and nursery herds in routine AMU surveillance in Canada. A future analysis using data from this project will examine factors that affect the quantity of AMU. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40813-022-00259-w. BioMed Central 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9047262/ /pubmed/35484556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-022-00259-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bosman, Angelina L.
Deckert, Anne E.
Carson, Carolee A.
Poljak, Zvonimir
Reid-Smith, Richard J.
McEwen, Scott A.
Antimicrobial use in lactating sows, piglets, nursery, and grower-finisher pigs on swine farms in Ontario, Canada during 2017 and 2018
title Antimicrobial use in lactating sows, piglets, nursery, and grower-finisher pigs on swine farms in Ontario, Canada during 2017 and 2018
title_full Antimicrobial use in lactating sows, piglets, nursery, and grower-finisher pigs on swine farms in Ontario, Canada during 2017 and 2018
title_fullStr Antimicrobial use in lactating sows, piglets, nursery, and grower-finisher pigs on swine farms in Ontario, Canada during 2017 and 2018
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial use in lactating sows, piglets, nursery, and grower-finisher pigs on swine farms in Ontario, Canada during 2017 and 2018
title_short Antimicrobial use in lactating sows, piglets, nursery, and grower-finisher pigs on swine farms in Ontario, Canada during 2017 and 2018
title_sort antimicrobial use in lactating sows, piglets, nursery, and grower-finisher pigs on swine farms in ontario, canada during 2017 and 2018
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35484556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-022-00259-w
work_keys_str_mv AT bosmanangelinal antimicrobialuseinlactatingsowspigletsnurseryandgrowerfinisherpigsonswinefarmsinontariocanadaduring2017and2018
AT deckertannee antimicrobialuseinlactatingsowspigletsnurseryandgrowerfinisherpigsonswinefarmsinontariocanadaduring2017and2018
AT carsoncaroleea antimicrobialuseinlactatingsowspigletsnurseryandgrowerfinisherpigsonswinefarmsinontariocanadaduring2017and2018
AT poljakzvonimir antimicrobialuseinlactatingsowspigletsnurseryandgrowerfinisherpigsonswinefarmsinontariocanadaduring2017and2018
AT reidsmithrichardj antimicrobialuseinlactatingsowspigletsnurseryandgrowerfinisherpigsonswinefarmsinontariocanadaduring2017and2018
AT mcewenscotta antimicrobialuseinlactatingsowspigletsnurseryandgrowerfinisherpigsonswinefarmsinontariocanadaduring2017and2018