Cargando…

Subsequent ipsi- and contralateral femoral fractures after intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture: a cohort study on 2012 patients

BACKGROUND: The literature is inconclusive as to whether an intramedullary nail changes the distribution of a subsequent ipsi- or contralateral fracture of the femur. We have compared the incidence, localisation, and fracture pattern of subsequent femoral fractures after intramedullary nailing of tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grønhaug, Kirsten Marie Larsen, Dybvik, Eva, Gjertsen, Jan-Erik, Samuelsson, Kristian, Östman, Bengt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35484538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05340-7
_version_ 1784695700496318464
author Grønhaug, Kirsten Marie Larsen
Dybvik, Eva
Gjertsen, Jan-Erik
Samuelsson, Kristian
Östman, Bengt
author_facet Grønhaug, Kirsten Marie Larsen
Dybvik, Eva
Gjertsen, Jan-Erik
Samuelsson, Kristian
Östman, Bengt
author_sort Grønhaug, Kirsten Marie Larsen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The literature is inconclusive as to whether an intramedullary nail changes the distribution of a subsequent ipsi- or contralateral fracture of the femur. We have compared the incidence, localisation, and fracture pattern of subsequent femoral fractures after intramedullary nailing of trochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures in patients without previous implants in either femur at the time of surgery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed of a two-centre cohort of 2012 patients treated with a short or long intramedullary nail for the management of trochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture between January 2005 and December 2018. Subsequent presentations with ipsi- and contralateral femoral fractures were documented. Only patients with no previous femoral surgery performed, other than the index nailing were followed. Odds ratios (ORs) for subsequent femoral fracture were calculated using robust variance estimates in logistic regression. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 82.4 years and 72.1% were female. The total number of patients presenting with subsequent femoral fractures was 299 (14.9%). The number of patients presenting with subsequent ipsilateral and contralateral femoral fractures was 51 (2.5%) and 248 (12.3%) respectively (OR 5.0; CI 3.7–6.9). Twenty-six (8.7%) of all subsequent femoral fractures occured in the ipsilateral shaft, 14 (4.7%) in the ipsilateral metaphyseal area, one (0.33%) in the contralateral shaft, and three (1.0%) in the contralateral metaphysis (OR 10; CI 3.6–29). CONCLUSION: An intramedullary nail significantly changes the fracture pattern in the event of a second low-energy trauma, reducing the risk of subsequent proximal ipsilateral femoral fractures and increasing the risk of subsequent ipsilateral femoral fractures in the shaft and distal metaphyseal area compared with the native contralateral femur.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9047323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90473232022-04-29 Subsequent ipsi- and contralateral femoral fractures after intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture: a cohort study on 2012 patients Grønhaug, Kirsten Marie Larsen Dybvik, Eva Gjertsen, Jan-Erik Samuelsson, Kristian Östman, Bengt BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: The literature is inconclusive as to whether an intramedullary nail changes the distribution of a subsequent ipsi- or contralateral fracture of the femur. We have compared the incidence, localisation, and fracture pattern of subsequent femoral fractures after intramedullary nailing of trochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures in patients without previous implants in either femur at the time of surgery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed of a two-centre cohort of 2012 patients treated with a short or long intramedullary nail for the management of trochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture between January 2005 and December 2018. Subsequent presentations with ipsi- and contralateral femoral fractures were documented. Only patients with no previous femoral surgery performed, other than the index nailing were followed. Odds ratios (ORs) for subsequent femoral fracture were calculated using robust variance estimates in logistic regression. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 82.4 years and 72.1% were female. The total number of patients presenting with subsequent femoral fractures was 299 (14.9%). The number of patients presenting with subsequent ipsilateral and contralateral femoral fractures was 51 (2.5%) and 248 (12.3%) respectively (OR 5.0; CI 3.7–6.9). Twenty-six (8.7%) of all subsequent femoral fractures occured in the ipsilateral shaft, 14 (4.7%) in the ipsilateral metaphyseal area, one (0.33%) in the contralateral shaft, and three (1.0%) in the contralateral metaphysis (OR 10; CI 3.6–29). CONCLUSION: An intramedullary nail significantly changes the fracture pattern in the event of a second low-energy trauma, reducing the risk of subsequent proximal ipsilateral femoral fractures and increasing the risk of subsequent ipsilateral femoral fractures in the shaft and distal metaphyseal area compared with the native contralateral femur. BioMed Central 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9047323/ /pubmed/35484538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05340-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Grønhaug, Kirsten Marie Larsen
Dybvik, Eva
Gjertsen, Jan-Erik
Samuelsson, Kristian
Östman, Bengt
Subsequent ipsi- and contralateral femoral fractures after intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture: a cohort study on 2012 patients
title Subsequent ipsi- and contralateral femoral fractures after intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture: a cohort study on 2012 patients
title_full Subsequent ipsi- and contralateral femoral fractures after intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture: a cohort study on 2012 patients
title_fullStr Subsequent ipsi- and contralateral femoral fractures after intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture: a cohort study on 2012 patients
title_full_unstemmed Subsequent ipsi- and contralateral femoral fractures after intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture: a cohort study on 2012 patients
title_short Subsequent ipsi- and contralateral femoral fractures after intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture: a cohort study on 2012 patients
title_sort subsequent ipsi- and contralateral femoral fractures after intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture: a cohort study on 2012 patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35484538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05340-7
work_keys_str_mv AT grønhaugkirstenmarielarsen subsequentipsiandcontralateralfemoralfracturesafterintramedullarynailingofatrochantericorsubtrochantericfractureacohortstudyon2012patients
AT dybvikeva subsequentipsiandcontralateralfemoralfracturesafterintramedullarynailingofatrochantericorsubtrochantericfractureacohortstudyon2012patients
AT gjertsenjanerik subsequentipsiandcontralateralfemoralfracturesafterintramedullarynailingofatrochantericorsubtrochantericfractureacohortstudyon2012patients
AT samuelssonkristian subsequentipsiandcontralateralfemoralfracturesafterintramedullarynailingofatrochantericorsubtrochantericfractureacohortstudyon2012patients
AT ostmanbengt subsequentipsiandcontralateralfemoralfracturesafterintramedullarynailingofatrochantericorsubtrochantericfractureacohortstudyon2012patients