Cargando…

Evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND: Recruiting healthcare providers as research subjects often rely on in-person recruitment strategies. Little is known about recruiting provider participants via electronic recruitment methods. In this study, conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, we describe and evaluate a primarily elec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazurenko, Olena, Sanner, Lindsey, Apathy, Nate C., Mamlin, Burke W., Menachemi, Nir, Adams, Meredith C. B., Hurley, Robert W., Erazo, Saura Fortin, Harle, Christopher A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35484491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01705-y
_version_ 1784695730465669120
author Mazurenko, Olena
Sanner, Lindsey
Apathy, Nate C.
Mamlin, Burke W.
Menachemi, Nir
Adams, Meredith C. B.
Hurley, Robert W.
Erazo, Saura Fortin
Harle, Christopher A.
author_facet Mazurenko, Olena
Sanner, Lindsey
Apathy, Nate C.
Mamlin, Burke W.
Menachemi, Nir
Adams, Meredith C. B.
Hurley, Robert W.
Erazo, Saura Fortin
Harle, Christopher A.
author_sort Mazurenko, Olena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recruiting healthcare providers as research subjects often rely on in-person recruitment strategies. Little is known about recruiting provider participants via electronic recruitment methods. In this study, conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, we describe and evaluate a primarily electronic approach to recruiting primary care providers (PCPs) as subjects in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a decision support intervention. METHODS: We adapted an existing framework for healthcare provider research recruitment, employing an electronic consent form and a mix of brief synchronous video presentations, email, and phone calls to recruit PCPs into the RCT. To evaluate the success of each electronic strategy, we estimated the number of consented PCPs associated with each strategy, the number of days to recruit each PCP and recruitment costs. RESULTS: We recruited 45 of 63 eligible PCPs practicing at ten primary care clinic locations over 55 days. On average, it took 17 business days to recruit a PCP (range 0–48) and required three attempts (range 1–7). Email communication from the clinic leaders led to the most successful recruitments, followed by brief synchronous video presentations at regularly scheduled clinic meetings. We spent approximately $89 per recruited PCP. We faced challenges of low email responsiveness and limited opportunities to forge relationships. CONCLUSION: PCPs can be efficiently recruited at low costs as research subjects using primarily electronic communications, even during a time of high workload and stress. Electronic peer leader outreach and synchronous video presentations may be particularly useful recruitment strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04295135. Registered 04 March 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9047458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90474582022-04-28 Evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic Mazurenko, Olena Sanner, Lindsey Apathy, Nate C. Mamlin, Burke W. Menachemi, Nir Adams, Meredith C. B. Hurley, Robert W. Erazo, Saura Fortin Harle, Christopher A. BMC Prim Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Recruiting healthcare providers as research subjects often rely on in-person recruitment strategies. Little is known about recruiting provider participants via electronic recruitment methods. In this study, conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, we describe and evaluate a primarily electronic approach to recruiting primary care providers (PCPs) as subjects in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a decision support intervention. METHODS: We adapted an existing framework for healthcare provider research recruitment, employing an electronic consent form and a mix of brief synchronous video presentations, email, and phone calls to recruit PCPs into the RCT. To evaluate the success of each electronic strategy, we estimated the number of consented PCPs associated with each strategy, the number of days to recruit each PCP and recruitment costs. RESULTS: We recruited 45 of 63 eligible PCPs practicing at ten primary care clinic locations over 55 days. On average, it took 17 business days to recruit a PCP (range 0–48) and required three attempts (range 1–7). Email communication from the clinic leaders led to the most successful recruitments, followed by brief synchronous video presentations at regularly scheduled clinic meetings. We spent approximately $89 per recruited PCP. We faced challenges of low email responsiveness and limited opportunities to forge relationships. CONCLUSION: PCPs can be efficiently recruited at low costs as research subjects using primarily electronic communications, even during a time of high workload and stress. Electronic peer leader outreach and synchronous video presentations may be particularly useful recruitment strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04295135. Registered 04 March 2020. BioMed Central 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9047458/ /pubmed/35484491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01705-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mazurenko, Olena
Sanner, Lindsey
Apathy, Nate C.
Mamlin, Burke W.
Menachemi, Nir
Adams, Meredith C. B.
Hurley, Robert W.
Erazo, Saura Fortin
Harle, Christopher A.
Evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic
title Evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the covid-19 pandemic
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35484491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01705-y
work_keys_str_mv AT mazurenkoolena evaluationofelectronicrecruitmenteffortsofprimarycareprovidersasresearchsubjectsduringthecovid19pandemic
AT sannerlindsey evaluationofelectronicrecruitmenteffortsofprimarycareprovidersasresearchsubjectsduringthecovid19pandemic
AT apathynatec evaluationofelectronicrecruitmenteffortsofprimarycareprovidersasresearchsubjectsduringthecovid19pandemic
AT mamlinburkew evaluationofelectronicrecruitmenteffortsofprimarycareprovidersasresearchsubjectsduringthecovid19pandemic
AT menacheminir evaluationofelectronicrecruitmenteffortsofprimarycareprovidersasresearchsubjectsduringthecovid19pandemic
AT adamsmeredithcb evaluationofelectronicrecruitmenteffortsofprimarycareprovidersasresearchsubjectsduringthecovid19pandemic
AT hurleyrobertw evaluationofelectronicrecruitmenteffortsofprimarycareprovidersasresearchsubjectsduringthecovid19pandemic
AT erazosaurafortin evaluationofelectronicrecruitmenteffortsofprimarycareprovidersasresearchsubjectsduringthecovid19pandemic
AT harlechristophera evaluationofelectronicrecruitmenteffortsofprimarycareprovidersasresearchsubjectsduringthecovid19pandemic