Cargando…
Evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic
BACKGROUND: Recruiting healthcare providers as research subjects often rely on in-person recruitment strategies. Little is known about recruiting provider participants via electronic recruitment methods. In this study, conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, we describe and evaluate a primarily elec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35484491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01705-y |
_version_ | 1784695730465669120 |
---|---|
author | Mazurenko, Olena Sanner, Lindsey Apathy, Nate C. Mamlin, Burke W. Menachemi, Nir Adams, Meredith C. B. Hurley, Robert W. Erazo, Saura Fortin Harle, Christopher A. |
author_facet | Mazurenko, Olena Sanner, Lindsey Apathy, Nate C. Mamlin, Burke W. Menachemi, Nir Adams, Meredith C. B. Hurley, Robert W. Erazo, Saura Fortin Harle, Christopher A. |
author_sort | Mazurenko, Olena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recruiting healthcare providers as research subjects often rely on in-person recruitment strategies. Little is known about recruiting provider participants via electronic recruitment methods. In this study, conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, we describe and evaluate a primarily electronic approach to recruiting primary care providers (PCPs) as subjects in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a decision support intervention. METHODS: We adapted an existing framework for healthcare provider research recruitment, employing an electronic consent form and a mix of brief synchronous video presentations, email, and phone calls to recruit PCPs into the RCT. To evaluate the success of each electronic strategy, we estimated the number of consented PCPs associated with each strategy, the number of days to recruit each PCP and recruitment costs. RESULTS: We recruited 45 of 63 eligible PCPs practicing at ten primary care clinic locations over 55 days. On average, it took 17 business days to recruit a PCP (range 0–48) and required three attempts (range 1–7). Email communication from the clinic leaders led to the most successful recruitments, followed by brief synchronous video presentations at regularly scheduled clinic meetings. We spent approximately $89 per recruited PCP. We faced challenges of low email responsiveness and limited opportunities to forge relationships. CONCLUSION: PCPs can be efficiently recruited at low costs as research subjects using primarily electronic communications, even during a time of high workload and stress. Electronic peer leader outreach and synchronous video presentations may be particularly useful recruitment strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04295135. Registered 04 March 2020. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9047458 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90474582022-04-28 Evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic Mazurenko, Olena Sanner, Lindsey Apathy, Nate C. Mamlin, Burke W. Menachemi, Nir Adams, Meredith C. B. Hurley, Robert W. Erazo, Saura Fortin Harle, Christopher A. BMC Prim Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Recruiting healthcare providers as research subjects often rely on in-person recruitment strategies. Little is known about recruiting provider participants via electronic recruitment methods. In this study, conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, we describe and evaluate a primarily electronic approach to recruiting primary care providers (PCPs) as subjects in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a decision support intervention. METHODS: We adapted an existing framework for healthcare provider research recruitment, employing an electronic consent form and a mix of brief synchronous video presentations, email, and phone calls to recruit PCPs into the RCT. To evaluate the success of each electronic strategy, we estimated the number of consented PCPs associated with each strategy, the number of days to recruit each PCP and recruitment costs. RESULTS: We recruited 45 of 63 eligible PCPs practicing at ten primary care clinic locations over 55 days. On average, it took 17 business days to recruit a PCP (range 0–48) and required three attempts (range 1–7). Email communication from the clinic leaders led to the most successful recruitments, followed by brief synchronous video presentations at regularly scheduled clinic meetings. We spent approximately $89 per recruited PCP. We faced challenges of low email responsiveness and limited opportunities to forge relationships. CONCLUSION: PCPs can be efficiently recruited at low costs as research subjects using primarily electronic communications, even during a time of high workload and stress. Electronic peer leader outreach and synchronous video presentations may be particularly useful recruitment strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04295135. Registered 04 March 2020. BioMed Central 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9047458/ /pubmed/35484491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01705-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mazurenko, Olena Sanner, Lindsey Apathy, Nate C. Mamlin, Burke W. Menachemi, Nir Adams, Meredith C. B. Hurley, Robert W. Erazo, Saura Fortin Harle, Christopher A. Evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title | Evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full | Evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_short | Evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_sort | evaluation of electronic recruitment efforts of primary care providers as research subjects during the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35484491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01705-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mazurenkoolena evaluationofelectronicrecruitmenteffortsofprimarycareprovidersasresearchsubjectsduringthecovid19pandemic AT sannerlindsey evaluationofelectronicrecruitmenteffortsofprimarycareprovidersasresearchsubjectsduringthecovid19pandemic AT apathynatec evaluationofelectronicrecruitmenteffortsofprimarycareprovidersasresearchsubjectsduringthecovid19pandemic AT mamlinburkew evaluationofelectronicrecruitmenteffortsofprimarycareprovidersasresearchsubjectsduringthecovid19pandemic AT menacheminir evaluationofelectronicrecruitmenteffortsofprimarycareprovidersasresearchsubjectsduringthecovid19pandemic AT adamsmeredithcb evaluationofelectronicrecruitmenteffortsofprimarycareprovidersasresearchsubjectsduringthecovid19pandemic AT hurleyrobertw evaluationofelectronicrecruitmenteffortsofprimarycareprovidersasresearchsubjectsduringthecovid19pandemic AT erazosaurafortin evaluationofelectronicrecruitmenteffortsofprimarycareprovidersasresearchsubjectsduringthecovid19pandemic AT harlechristophera evaluationofelectronicrecruitmenteffortsofprimarycareprovidersasresearchsubjectsduringthecovid19pandemic |