Cargando…

A Meta-Analysis of Biostimulant Yield Effectiveness in Field Trials

Today's agriculture faces many concerns in maintaining crop yield while adapting to climate change and transitioning to more sustainable cultivation practices. The application of plant biostimulants (PBs) is one of the methods that step forward to address these challenges. The advantages of PBs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jing, Van Gerrewey, Thijs, Geelen, Danny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35498677
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.836702
_version_ 1784695741099278336
author Li, Jing
Van Gerrewey, Thijs
Geelen, Danny
author_facet Li, Jing
Van Gerrewey, Thijs
Geelen, Danny
author_sort Li, Jing
collection PubMed
description Today's agriculture faces many concerns in maintaining crop yield while adapting to climate change and transitioning to more sustainable cultivation practices. The application of plant biostimulants (PBs) is one of the methods that step forward to address these challenges. The advantages of PBs have been reported numerous times. Yet, there is a general lack of quantitative assessment of the overall impact of PBs on crop production. Here we report a comprehensive meta-analysis on biostimulants (focus on non-microbial PBs) of over one thousand pairs of open-field data in a total of 180 qualified studies worldwide. Yield gains in open-field cultivation upon biostimulant application were compared across different parameters: biostimulant category, application method, crop species, climate condition, and soil property. The overall results showed that (1) the add-on yield benefit among all biostimulant categories is on average 17.9% and reached the highest potential via soil treatment; (2) biostimulant applied in arid climates and vegetable cultivation had the highest impact on crop yield; and (3) biostimulants were more efficient in low soil organic matter content, non-neutral, saline, nutrient-insufficient, and sandy soils. This systematic review provides general biostimulant application guidelines and gives consultants and growers insights into achieving an optimal benefit from biostimulant application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9047501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90475012022-04-29 A Meta-Analysis of Biostimulant Yield Effectiveness in Field Trials Li, Jing Van Gerrewey, Thijs Geelen, Danny Front Plant Sci Plant Science Today's agriculture faces many concerns in maintaining crop yield while adapting to climate change and transitioning to more sustainable cultivation practices. The application of plant biostimulants (PBs) is one of the methods that step forward to address these challenges. The advantages of PBs have been reported numerous times. Yet, there is a general lack of quantitative assessment of the overall impact of PBs on crop production. Here we report a comprehensive meta-analysis on biostimulants (focus on non-microbial PBs) of over one thousand pairs of open-field data in a total of 180 qualified studies worldwide. Yield gains in open-field cultivation upon biostimulant application were compared across different parameters: biostimulant category, application method, crop species, climate condition, and soil property. The overall results showed that (1) the add-on yield benefit among all biostimulant categories is on average 17.9% and reached the highest potential via soil treatment; (2) biostimulant applied in arid climates and vegetable cultivation had the highest impact on crop yield; and (3) biostimulants were more efficient in low soil organic matter content, non-neutral, saline, nutrient-insufficient, and sandy soils. This systematic review provides general biostimulant application guidelines and gives consultants and growers insights into achieving an optimal benefit from biostimulant application. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9047501/ /pubmed/35498677 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.836702 Text en Copyright © 2022 Li, Van Gerrewey and Geelen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Li, Jing
Van Gerrewey, Thijs
Geelen, Danny
A Meta-Analysis of Biostimulant Yield Effectiveness in Field Trials
title A Meta-Analysis of Biostimulant Yield Effectiveness in Field Trials
title_full A Meta-Analysis of Biostimulant Yield Effectiveness in Field Trials
title_fullStr A Meta-Analysis of Biostimulant Yield Effectiveness in Field Trials
title_full_unstemmed A Meta-Analysis of Biostimulant Yield Effectiveness in Field Trials
title_short A Meta-Analysis of Biostimulant Yield Effectiveness in Field Trials
title_sort meta-analysis of biostimulant yield effectiveness in field trials
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35498677
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.836702
work_keys_str_mv AT lijing ametaanalysisofbiostimulantyieldeffectivenessinfieldtrials
AT vangerreweythijs ametaanalysisofbiostimulantyieldeffectivenessinfieldtrials
AT geelendanny ametaanalysisofbiostimulantyieldeffectivenessinfieldtrials
AT lijing metaanalysisofbiostimulantyieldeffectivenessinfieldtrials
AT vangerreweythijs metaanalysisofbiostimulantyieldeffectivenessinfieldtrials
AT geelendanny metaanalysisofbiostimulantyieldeffectivenessinfieldtrials