Cargando…

Reducing the risk of non-sterility of aseptic handling in hospital pharmacies, part A: risk assessment

OBJECTIVES: To determine prospectively the sources of risk of non-sterility during aseptic handling and to quantify the risks of each of these sources. METHODS: A risk assessment (RA) of non-sterility according to Failure Mode and Effect Analysis was executed by a multidisciplinary team of (hospital...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boom, Frits A, Ris, Judith M, Veenbaas, Tjitske, Le Brun, Paul P H, Touw, Daan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32385070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-002178
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To determine prospectively the sources of risk of non-sterility during aseptic handling and to quantify the risks of each of these sources. METHODS: A risk assessment (RA) of non-sterility according to Failure Mode and Effect Analysis was executed by a multidisciplinary team of (hospital) pharmacists and technicians, a consultant experienced in aseptic processing and an independent facilitator. The team determined the sources of risk of non-sterility, a 5 point scale for severity, occurrence and detection, and risk acceptance levels. Input about general applied risk reduction was collected by audits in 10 hospital pharmacies. The results of these audits were used for determining the remaining risks. The results, as well as scientific information and the experience of the team members, was used to determine scores for severity, occurrence and detection. RESULTS: Multiplying the scores for severity, occurrence and detection results in the risk prioritisation number (RPN) which is a relative value of the remaining risks of non-sterility for each source. Incorrect disinfection techniques of non-sterile materials and the chances of touching critical spots were estimated as the greatest risks. The risk of non-sterility via the airborne route was low. RPN values were helpful in prioritising measures for additional risk reduction (this will be described in an accompanying article). CONCLUSION: The RA, described here, was a systematic survey related to all sources of risk of non-sterility during aseptic handling. The determined RPN values were helpful in prioritising measures for additional risk reduction.