Cargando…

Developing quality assurance tests for simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography – Magnetic Resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning

Background and purpose Simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography – Magnetic Resonance (PET-MR) imaging can potentially improve radiotherapy by enabling more accurate tumour delineation and dose painting. The use of PET-MR imaging for radiotherapy planning requires a comprehensive Quality Assurance (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wyatt, Jonathan J., McCallum, Hazel M., Maxwell, Ross J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9048159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35493852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.03.003
_version_ 1784695877116362752
author Wyatt, Jonathan J.
McCallum, Hazel M.
Maxwell, Ross J.
author_facet Wyatt, Jonathan J.
McCallum, Hazel M.
Maxwell, Ross J.
author_sort Wyatt, Jonathan J.
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose Simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography – Magnetic Resonance (PET-MR) imaging can potentially improve radiotherapy by enabling more accurate tumour delineation and dose painting. The use of PET-MR imaging for radiotherapy planning requires a comprehensive Quality Assurance (QA) programme to be developed. This study aimed to develop the QA tests required and assess their repeatability and stability. Materials and methods QA tests were developed for: MR image quality, MR geometric accuracy, electromechanical accuracy, PET-MR alignment accuracy, Diffusion Weighted (DW)-MR Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) accuracy and PET Standard Uptake Value (SUV) accuracy. Each test used a dedicated phantom and was analysed automatically or semi-automatically, with in–house software. Repeatability was evaluated by three same-day measurements with independent phantom positions. Stability was assessed through 12 monthly measurements. Results The repeatability Standard Deviations (SDs) of distortion for the MR geometric accuracy test were [Formula: see text]. The repeatability SDs in ADC difference from reference were [Formula: see text] for the DW-MR accuracy test. The PET SUV difference from reference repeatability SD was [Formula: see text]. The stability SDs agreed within [Formula: see text] , 1 percentage point and 1.4 percentage points of the repeatability SDs for the geometric, ADC and SUV accuracy tests respectively. There were no monthly trends apparent. These results were representative of the other tests. Conclusions QA Tests for radiotherapy planning PET-MR have been developed. The tests appeared repeatable and stable over a 12-month period. The developed QA tests could form the basis of a QA programme that enables high-quality, robust PET-MR imaging for radiotherapy planning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9048159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90481592022-04-29 Developing quality assurance tests for simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography – Magnetic Resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning Wyatt, Jonathan J. McCallum, Hazel M. Maxwell, Ross J. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Article(s) from the Special Issue on Physics highlights from ESTRO 2021 Background and purpose Simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography – Magnetic Resonance (PET-MR) imaging can potentially improve radiotherapy by enabling more accurate tumour delineation and dose painting. The use of PET-MR imaging for radiotherapy planning requires a comprehensive Quality Assurance (QA) programme to be developed. This study aimed to develop the QA tests required and assess their repeatability and stability. Materials and methods QA tests were developed for: MR image quality, MR geometric accuracy, electromechanical accuracy, PET-MR alignment accuracy, Diffusion Weighted (DW)-MR Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) accuracy and PET Standard Uptake Value (SUV) accuracy. Each test used a dedicated phantom and was analysed automatically or semi-automatically, with in–house software. Repeatability was evaluated by three same-day measurements with independent phantom positions. Stability was assessed through 12 monthly measurements. Results The repeatability Standard Deviations (SDs) of distortion for the MR geometric accuracy test were [Formula: see text]. The repeatability SDs in ADC difference from reference were [Formula: see text] for the DW-MR accuracy test. The PET SUV difference from reference repeatability SD was [Formula: see text]. The stability SDs agreed within [Formula: see text] , 1 percentage point and 1.4 percentage points of the repeatability SDs for the geometric, ADC and SUV accuracy tests respectively. There were no monthly trends apparent. These results were representative of the other tests. Conclusions QA Tests for radiotherapy planning PET-MR have been developed. The tests appeared repeatable and stable over a 12-month period. The developed QA tests could form the basis of a QA programme that enables high-quality, robust PET-MR imaging for radiotherapy planning. Elsevier 2022-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9048159/ /pubmed/35493852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.03.003 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article(s) from the Special Issue on Physics highlights from ESTRO 2021
Wyatt, Jonathan J.
McCallum, Hazel M.
Maxwell, Ross J.
Developing quality assurance tests for simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography – Magnetic Resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning
title Developing quality assurance tests for simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography – Magnetic Resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning
title_full Developing quality assurance tests for simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography – Magnetic Resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning
title_fullStr Developing quality assurance tests for simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography – Magnetic Resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning
title_full_unstemmed Developing quality assurance tests for simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography – Magnetic Resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning
title_short Developing quality assurance tests for simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography – Magnetic Resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning
title_sort developing quality assurance tests for simultaneous positron emission tomography – magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy planning
topic Article(s) from the Special Issue on Physics highlights from ESTRO 2021
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9048159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35493852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.03.003
work_keys_str_mv AT wyattjonathanj developingqualityassurancetestsforsimultaneouspositronemissiontomographymagneticresonanceimagingforradiotherapyplanning
AT mccallumhazelm developingqualityassurancetestsforsimultaneouspositronemissiontomographymagneticresonanceimagingforradiotherapyplanning
AT maxwellrossj developingqualityassurancetestsforsimultaneouspositronemissiontomographymagneticresonanceimagingforradiotherapyplanning