Cargando…

Phase 2b, Randomized, 3-Month, Dose-Finding Study of Sepetaprost in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: The ANGEL Study

PURPOSE: This phase 2b, randomized, observer-masked, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group, multinational (USA and Japan), multicenter study (NCT03216902) assessed the optimal dose of sepetaprost ophthalmic solution in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wirta, David L., Kuwayama, Yasuaki, Lu, Fenghe, Shao, Hui, Odani-Kawabata, Noriko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9048176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35167779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jop.2021.0077
_version_ 1784695879823785984
author Wirta, David L.
Kuwayama, Yasuaki
Lu, Fenghe
Shao, Hui
Odani-Kawabata, Noriko
author_facet Wirta, David L.
Kuwayama, Yasuaki
Lu, Fenghe
Shao, Hui
Odani-Kawabata, Noriko
author_sort Wirta, David L.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This phase 2b, randomized, observer-masked, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group, multinational (USA and Japan), multicenter study (NCT03216902) assessed the optimal dose of sepetaprost ophthalmic solution in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: After washout, patients ≥18 years (USA) or ≥20 years of age (Japan) received once-daily sepetaprost for 3 months [0.0005% (n = 43); 0.001% (n = 43); 0.002% (n = 44); and 0.003% (n = 45)], latanoprost 0.005% (n = 44) or placebo until week 6, followed by sepetaprost 0.003% until month 3 (n = 22). Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) occurrence. RESULTS: Baseline mean diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) was 24.3 mmHg for latanoprost and ranged between 24.1 and 24.5 mmHg for the sepetaprost groups. Sepetaprost 0.002% had the lowest IOP at each month 3 time point (9:00 AM; 1:00 PM; 5:00 PM) of all sepetaprost concentrations (mean ± standard error: 17.6 ± 0.5; 17.4 ± 0.4; 16.7 ± 0.4 mmHg); similar values were observed with latanoprost (18.1 ± 0.6; 17.3 ± 0.5; 17.2 ± 0.5 mmHg). A positive dose–response relationship was observed with the 3 lower sepetaprost doses; sepetaprost 0.002% had numerically greater IOP-lowering effects than sepetaprost 0.003%. All sepetaprost doses had statistically significantly greater IOP reductions from baseline versus placebo at week 6 (P < 0.0001). This IOP-lowering effect was consistent between Japan- and USA-based patients. Most AEs were mild and occurred numerically less frequently with sepetaprost 0.002% (34.1%) versus latanoprost (50.0%). The most frequently reported AE was conjunctival hyperemia. CONCLUSION: In this study, sepetaprost 0.002% was the optimal concentration, showing comparable IOP-lowering efficacy and safety with latanoprost 0.005%. Most AEs were mild; occurrence was numerically lower with sepetaprost 0.002% than latanoprost 0.005%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9048176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90481762022-04-28 Phase 2b, Randomized, 3-Month, Dose-Finding Study of Sepetaprost in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: The ANGEL Study Wirta, David L. Kuwayama, Yasuaki Lu, Fenghe Shao, Hui Odani-Kawabata, Noriko J Ocul Pharmacol Ther Original Articles PURPOSE: This phase 2b, randomized, observer-masked, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group, multinational (USA and Japan), multicenter study (NCT03216902) assessed the optimal dose of sepetaprost ophthalmic solution in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: After washout, patients ≥18 years (USA) or ≥20 years of age (Japan) received once-daily sepetaprost for 3 months [0.0005% (n = 43); 0.001% (n = 43); 0.002% (n = 44); and 0.003% (n = 45)], latanoprost 0.005% (n = 44) or placebo until week 6, followed by sepetaprost 0.003% until month 3 (n = 22). Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) occurrence. RESULTS: Baseline mean diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) was 24.3 mmHg for latanoprost and ranged between 24.1 and 24.5 mmHg for the sepetaprost groups. Sepetaprost 0.002% had the lowest IOP at each month 3 time point (9:00 AM; 1:00 PM; 5:00 PM) of all sepetaprost concentrations (mean ± standard error: 17.6 ± 0.5; 17.4 ± 0.4; 16.7 ± 0.4 mmHg); similar values were observed with latanoprost (18.1 ± 0.6; 17.3 ± 0.5; 17.2 ± 0.5 mmHg). A positive dose–response relationship was observed with the 3 lower sepetaprost doses; sepetaprost 0.002% had numerically greater IOP-lowering effects than sepetaprost 0.003%. All sepetaprost doses had statistically significantly greater IOP reductions from baseline versus placebo at week 6 (P < 0.0001). This IOP-lowering effect was consistent between Japan- and USA-based patients. Most AEs were mild and occurred numerically less frequently with sepetaprost 0.002% (34.1%) versus latanoprost (50.0%). The most frequently reported AE was conjunctival hyperemia. CONCLUSION: In this study, sepetaprost 0.002% was the optimal concentration, showing comparable IOP-lowering efficacy and safety with latanoprost 0.005%. Most AEs were mild; occurrence was numerically lower with sepetaprost 0.002% than latanoprost 0.005%. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022-04-01 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9048176/ /pubmed/35167779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jop.2021.0077 Text en © David L. Wirta et al. 2022; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License [CC-BY-NC] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wirta, David L.
Kuwayama, Yasuaki
Lu, Fenghe
Shao, Hui
Odani-Kawabata, Noriko
Phase 2b, Randomized, 3-Month, Dose-Finding Study of Sepetaprost in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: The ANGEL Study
title Phase 2b, Randomized, 3-Month, Dose-Finding Study of Sepetaprost in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: The ANGEL Study
title_full Phase 2b, Randomized, 3-Month, Dose-Finding Study of Sepetaprost in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: The ANGEL Study
title_fullStr Phase 2b, Randomized, 3-Month, Dose-Finding Study of Sepetaprost in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: The ANGEL Study
title_full_unstemmed Phase 2b, Randomized, 3-Month, Dose-Finding Study of Sepetaprost in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: The ANGEL Study
title_short Phase 2b, Randomized, 3-Month, Dose-Finding Study of Sepetaprost in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: The ANGEL Study
title_sort phase 2b, randomized, 3-month, dose-finding study of sepetaprost in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: the angel study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9048176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35167779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jop.2021.0077
work_keys_str_mv AT wirtadavidl phase2brandomized3monthdosefindingstudyofsepetaprostinpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertensiontheangelstudy
AT kuwayamayasuaki phase2brandomized3monthdosefindingstudyofsepetaprostinpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertensiontheangelstudy
AT lufenghe phase2brandomized3monthdosefindingstudyofsepetaprostinpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertensiontheangelstudy
AT shaohui phase2brandomized3monthdosefindingstudyofsepetaprostinpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertensiontheangelstudy
AT odanikawabatanoriko phase2brandomized3monthdosefindingstudyofsepetaprostinpatientswithprimaryopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertensiontheangelstudy