Cargando…

Hybrid Close-Loop Systems Versus Predictive Low-Glucose Suspend and Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: A Single-Center Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION: Predictive low-glucose suspend (PLGS) and hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems may improve glucose control and quality of life in type 1 diabetic individuals. This is a cross-sectional, single-center study to compare the effect on metabolic control and glucose variability of PLGS and HCL s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lunati, Maria Elena, Morpurgo, Paola Silvia, Rossi, Antonio, Gandolfi, Alessandra, Cogliati, Irene, Bolla, Andrea Mario, Plebani, Laura, Vallone, Luciana, Montefusco, Laura, Pastore, Ida, Cimino, Vincenzo, Argenti, Sabrina, Volpi, Graziella, Zuccotti, Gian Vincenzo, Fiorina, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9048202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35498423
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.816599
_version_ 1784695883937349632
author Lunati, Maria Elena
Morpurgo, Paola Silvia
Rossi, Antonio
Gandolfi, Alessandra
Cogliati, Irene
Bolla, Andrea Mario
Plebani, Laura
Vallone, Luciana
Montefusco, Laura
Pastore, Ida
Cimino, Vincenzo
Argenti, Sabrina
Volpi, Graziella
Zuccotti, Gian Vincenzo
Fiorina, Paolo
author_facet Lunati, Maria Elena
Morpurgo, Paola Silvia
Rossi, Antonio
Gandolfi, Alessandra
Cogliati, Irene
Bolla, Andrea Mario
Plebani, Laura
Vallone, Luciana
Montefusco, Laura
Pastore, Ida
Cimino, Vincenzo
Argenti, Sabrina
Volpi, Graziella
Zuccotti, Gian Vincenzo
Fiorina, Paolo
author_sort Lunati, Maria Elena
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Predictive low-glucose suspend (PLGS) and hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems may improve glucose control and quality of life in type 1 diabetic individuals. This is a cross-sectional, single-center study to compare the effect on metabolic control and glucose variability of PLGS and HCL systems as compared to standard sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 136 adults (men/women 69/67, mean age 47.3 ± 13.9 years) with T1D on insulin pump therapy, divided accordingly to type of insulin pump system (group 1: SAP, 24 subjects; group 2: PLGS, 49 subjects; group 3: HCL, 63 subjects). The groups were matched for age, gender, years of disease, years of CSII use, and CGM wear time. RESULTS: The analysis of CGM metrics, in the three groups, showed a statistically significant different percentage of time within the target range, defined as 70–180 mg/dl, with a higher percentage in group 3 and significantly less time spent in the hypoglycemic range in groups 2 and 3. The three groups were statistically different also for the glucose management indicator and coefficient of variation percentage, which were progressively lower moving from group 1 to group 3. In the HCL group, 52.4% of subjects reached a percentage of time passed in the euglycemic range above 70%, as compared to 32.7% in those with PLGS and 20.2% in those with SAP. A positive correlation between the higher percentage of TIR and the use of auto-mode was evident in the HCL group. Finally, the three groups did not show any statistical differences regarding the quality-of-life questionnaire, but there was a significant negative correlation between CV and perceived CSII-use convenience (r = -0.207, p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: HCL systems were more effective in improving glucose control and in reducing the risk of hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes, thereby mitigating risk for acute and chronic complications and positively affecting diabetes technologies’ acceptance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9048202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90482022022-04-29 Hybrid Close-Loop Systems Versus Predictive Low-Glucose Suspend and Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: A Single-Center Cohort Study Lunati, Maria Elena Morpurgo, Paola Silvia Rossi, Antonio Gandolfi, Alessandra Cogliati, Irene Bolla, Andrea Mario Plebani, Laura Vallone, Luciana Montefusco, Laura Pastore, Ida Cimino, Vincenzo Argenti, Sabrina Volpi, Graziella Zuccotti, Gian Vincenzo Fiorina, Paolo Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology INTRODUCTION: Predictive low-glucose suspend (PLGS) and hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems may improve glucose control and quality of life in type 1 diabetic individuals. This is a cross-sectional, single-center study to compare the effect on metabolic control and glucose variability of PLGS and HCL systems as compared to standard sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 136 adults (men/women 69/67, mean age 47.3 ± 13.9 years) with T1D on insulin pump therapy, divided accordingly to type of insulin pump system (group 1: SAP, 24 subjects; group 2: PLGS, 49 subjects; group 3: HCL, 63 subjects). The groups were matched for age, gender, years of disease, years of CSII use, and CGM wear time. RESULTS: The analysis of CGM metrics, in the three groups, showed a statistically significant different percentage of time within the target range, defined as 70–180 mg/dl, with a higher percentage in group 3 and significantly less time spent in the hypoglycemic range in groups 2 and 3. The three groups were statistically different also for the glucose management indicator and coefficient of variation percentage, which were progressively lower moving from group 1 to group 3. In the HCL group, 52.4% of subjects reached a percentage of time passed in the euglycemic range above 70%, as compared to 32.7% in those with PLGS and 20.2% in those with SAP. A positive correlation between the higher percentage of TIR and the use of auto-mode was evident in the HCL group. Finally, the three groups did not show any statistical differences regarding the quality-of-life questionnaire, but there was a significant negative correlation between CV and perceived CSII-use convenience (r = -0.207, p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: HCL systems were more effective in improving glucose control and in reducing the risk of hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes, thereby mitigating risk for acute and chronic complications and positively affecting diabetes technologies’ acceptance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9048202/ /pubmed/35498423 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.816599 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lunati, Morpurgo, Rossi, Gandolfi, Cogliati, Bolla, Plebani, Vallone, Montefusco, Pastore, Cimino, Argenti, Volpi, Zuccotti and Fiorina https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Lunati, Maria Elena
Morpurgo, Paola Silvia
Rossi, Antonio
Gandolfi, Alessandra
Cogliati, Irene
Bolla, Andrea Mario
Plebani, Laura
Vallone, Luciana
Montefusco, Laura
Pastore, Ida
Cimino, Vincenzo
Argenti, Sabrina
Volpi, Graziella
Zuccotti, Gian Vincenzo
Fiorina, Paolo
Hybrid Close-Loop Systems Versus Predictive Low-Glucose Suspend and Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: A Single-Center Cohort Study
title Hybrid Close-Loop Systems Versus Predictive Low-Glucose Suspend and Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: A Single-Center Cohort Study
title_full Hybrid Close-Loop Systems Versus Predictive Low-Glucose Suspend and Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: A Single-Center Cohort Study
title_fullStr Hybrid Close-Loop Systems Versus Predictive Low-Glucose Suspend and Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: A Single-Center Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Hybrid Close-Loop Systems Versus Predictive Low-Glucose Suspend and Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: A Single-Center Cohort Study
title_short Hybrid Close-Loop Systems Versus Predictive Low-Glucose Suspend and Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: A Single-Center Cohort Study
title_sort hybrid close-loop systems versus predictive low-glucose suspend and sensor-augmented pump therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes: a single-center cohort study
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9048202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35498423
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.816599
work_keys_str_mv AT lunatimariaelena hybridcloseloopsystemsversuspredictivelowglucosesuspendandsensoraugmentedpumptherapyinpatientswithtype1diabetesasinglecentercohortstudy
AT morpurgopaolasilvia hybridcloseloopsystemsversuspredictivelowglucosesuspendandsensoraugmentedpumptherapyinpatientswithtype1diabetesasinglecentercohortstudy
AT rossiantonio hybridcloseloopsystemsversuspredictivelowglucosesuspendandsensoraugmentedpumptherapyinpatientswithtype1diabetesasinglecentercohortstudy
AT gandolfialessandra hybridcloseloopsystemsversuspredictivelowglucosesuspendandsensoraugmentedpumptherapyinpatientswithtype1diabetesasinglecentercohortstudy
AT cogliatiirene hybridcloseloopsystemsversuspredictivelowglucosesuspendandsensoraugmentedpumptherapyinpatientswithtype1diabetesasinglecentercohortstudy
AT bollaandreamario hybridcloseloopsystemsversuspredictivelowglucosesuspendandsensoraugmentedpumptherapyinpatientswithtype1diabetesasinglecentercohortstudy
AT plebanilaura hybridcloseloopsystemsversuspredictivelowglucosesuspendandsensoraugmentedpumptherapyinpatientswithtype1diabetesasinglecentercohortstudy
AT valloneluciana hybridcloseloopsystemsversuspredictivelowglucosesuspendandsensoraugmentedpumptherapyinpatientswithtype1diabetesasinglecentercohortstudy
AT montefuscolaura hybridcloseloopsystemsversuspredictivelowglucosesuspendandsensoraugmentedpumptherapyinpatientswithtype1diabetesasinglecentercohortstudy
AT pastoreida hybridcloseloopsystemsversuspredictivelowglucosesuspendandsensoraugmentedpumptherapyinpatientswithtype1diabetesasinglecentercohortstudy
AT ciminovincenzo hybridcloseloopsystemsversuspredictivelowglucosesuspendandsensoraugmentedpumptherapyinpatientswithtype1diabetesasinglecentercohortstudy
AT argentisabrina hybridcloseloopsystemsversuspredictivelowglucosesuspendandsensoraugmentedpumptherapyinpatientswithtype1diabetesasinglecentercohortstudy
AT volpigraziella hybridcloseloopsystemsversuspredictivelowglucosesuspendandsensoraugmentedpumptherapyinpatientswithtype1diabetesasinglecentercohortstudy
AT zuccottigianvincenzo hybridcloseloopsystemsversuspredictivelowglucosesuspendandsensoraugmentedpumptherapyinpatientswithtype1diabetesasinglecentercohortstudy
AT fiorinapaolo hybridcloseloopsystemsversuspredictivelowglucosesuspendandsensoraugmentedpumptherapyinpatientswithtype1diabetesasinglecentercohortstudy