Cargando…

Antibiotic-free antimicrobial poly (methyl methacrylate) bone cements: A state-of-the-art review

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most serious complication following total joint arthroplasty, this being because it is associated with, among other things, high morbidity and low quality of life, is difficult to prevent, and is very challenging to treat/manage. The many shortcomings of antib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lewis, Gladius
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9048499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35582158
http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i4.339
_version_ 1784695942501367808
author Lewis, Gladius
author_facet Lewis, Gladius
author_sort Lewis, Gladius
collection PubMed
description Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most serious complication following total joint arthroplasty, this being because it is associated with, among other things, high morbidity and low quality of life, is difficult to prevent, and is very challenging to treat/manage. The many shortcomings of antibiotic-loaded poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) bone cement (ALBC) as an agent for preventing and treating/managing PJI are well-known. One is that microorganisms responsible for most PJI cases, such as methicillin-resistant S. aureus, have developed or are developing resistance to gentamicin sulfate, which is the antibiotic in the vast majority of approved ALBC brands. This has led to many research efforts to develop cements that do not contain gentamicin (or, for that matter, any antibiotic) but demonstrate excellent antimicrobial efficacy. There is a sizeable body of literature on these so-called “antibiotic-free antimicrobial” PMMA bone cements (AFAMBCs). The present work is a comprehensive and critical review of this body. In addition to summaries of key trends in results of characterization studies of AFAMBCs, the attractive features and shortcomings of the literature are highlighted. Shortcomings provide motivation for future work, with some ideas being formulation of a new generation of AFAMBCs by, example, adding a nanostructured material and/or an extract from a natural product to the powder and/or liquid of the basis cement, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9048499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90484992022-05-16 Antibiotic-free antimicrobial poly (methyl methacrylate) bone cements: A state-of-the-art review Lewis, Gladius World J Orthop Review Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most serious complication following total joint arthroplasty, this being because it is associated with, among other things, high morbidity and low quality of life, is difficult to prevent, and is very challenging to treat/manage. The many shortcomings of antibiotic-loaded poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) bone cement (ALBC) as an agent for preventing and treating/managing PJI are well-known. One is that microorganisms responsible for most PJI cases, such as methicillin-resistant S. aureus, have developed or are developing resistance to gentamicin sulfate, which is the antibiotic in the vast majority of approved ALBC brands. This has led to many research efforts to develop cements that do not contain gentamicin (or, for that matter, any antibiotic) but demonstrate excellent antimicrobial efficacy. There is a sizeable body of literature on these so-called “antibiotic-free antimicrobial” PMMA bone cements (AFAMBCs). The present work is a comprehensive and critical review of this body. In addition to summaries of key trends in results of characterization studies of AFAMBCs, the attractive features and shortcomings of the literature are highlighted. Shortcomings provide motivation for future work, with some ideas being formulation of a new generation of AFAMBCs by, example, adding a nanostructured material and/or an extract from a natural product to the powder and/or liquid of the basis cement, respectively. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9048499/ /pubmed/35582158 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i4.339 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Review
Lewis, Gladius
Antibiotic-free antimicrobial poly (methyl methacrylate) bone cements: A state-of-the-art review
title Antibiotic-free antimicrobial poly (methyl methacrylate) bone cements: A state-of-the-art review
title_full Antibiotic-free antimicrobial poly (methyl methacrylate) bone cements: A state-of-the-art review
title_fullStr Antibiotic-free antimicrobial poly (methyl methacrylate) bone cements: A state-of-the-art review
title_full_unstemmed Antibiotic-free antimicrobial poly (methyl methacrylate) bone cements: A state-of-the-art review
title_short Antibiotic-free antimicrobial poly (methyl methacrylate) bone cements: A state-of-the-art review
title_sort antibiotic-free antimicrobial poly (methyl methacrylate) bone cements: a state-of-the-art review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9048499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35582158
http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i4.339
work_keys_str_mv AT lewisgladius antibioticfreeantimicrobialpolymethylmethacrylatebonecementsastateoftheartreview