Cargando…

Comment on “Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: A state-of-the-art review”

Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) was introduced nearly two decades ago. Initially, it was limited by poor image quality and short battery time, but due to technical improvements, it has become an equal diagnostic alternative to optical colonoscopy (OC). Hastened by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bjørsum-Meyer, Thomas, Koulaouzidis, Anastasios, Baatrup, Gunnar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9048781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35581959
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i16.1722
_version_ 1784696006413123584
author Bjørsum-Meyer, Thomas
Koulaouzidis, Anastasios
Baatrup, Gunnar
author_facet Bjørsum-Meyer, Thomas
Koulaouzidis, Anastasios
Baatrup, Gunnar
author_sort Bjørsum-Meyer, Thomas
collection PubMed
description Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) was introduced nearly two decades ago. Initially, it was limited by poor image quality and short battery time, but due to technical improvements, it has become an equal diagnostic alternative to optical colonoscopy (OC). Hastened by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, CCE has been introduced in clinical practice to relieve overburdened endoscopy units and move investigations to out-patient clinics. A wider adoption of CCE would be bolstered by positive patient experience, as it offers a diagnostic investigation that is not inferior to other modalities. The shortcomings of CCE include its inability to differentiate adenomatous polyps from hyperplastic polyps. Solving this issue would improve the stratification of patients for polyp removal. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promising results in polyp detection and characterization to minimize incomplete CCEs and avoid needless examinations. Onboard AI appears to be a needed application to enable near-real-time decision-making in order to diminish patient waiting times and avoid superfluous subsequent OCs. With this letter, we discuss the potential and role of AI in CCE as a diagnostic tool for the large bowel.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9048781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90487812022-05-16 Comment on “Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: A state-of-the-art review” Bjørsum-Meyer, Thomas Koulaouzidis, Anastasios Baatrup, Gunnar World J Gastroenterol Letter to the Editor Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) was introduced nearly two decades ago. Initially, it was limited by poor image quality and short battery time, but due to technical improvements, it has become an equal diagnostic alternative to optical colonoscopy (OC). Hastened by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, CCE has been introduced in clinical practice to relieve overburdened endoscopy units and move investigations to out-patient clinics. A wider adoption of CCE would be bolstered by positive patient experience, as it offers a diagnostic investigation that is not inferior to other modalities. The shortcomings of CCE include its inability to differentiate adenomatous polyps from hyperplastic polyps. Solving this issue would improve the stratification of patients for polyp removal. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promising results in polyp detection and characterization to minimize incomplete CCEs and avoid needless examinations. Onboard AI appears to be a needed application to enable near-real-time decision-making in order to diminish patient waiting times and avoid superfluous subsequent OCs. With this letter, we discuss the potential and role of AI in CCE as a diagnostic tool for the large bowel. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-04-28 2022-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9048781/ /pubmed/35581959 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i16.1722 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Letter to the Editor
Bjørsum-Meyer, Thomas
Koulaouzidis, Anastasios
Baatrup, Gunnar
Comment on “Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: A state-of-the-art review”
title Comment on “Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: A state-of-the-art review”
title_full Comment on “Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: A state-of-the-art review”
title_fullStr Comment on “Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: A state-of-the-art review”
title_full_unstemmed Comment on “Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: A state-of-the-art review”
title_short Comment on “Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: A state-of-the-art review”
title_sort comment on “artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: a state-of-the-art review”
topic Letter to the Editor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9048781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35581959
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i16.1722
work_keys_str_mv AT bjørsummeyerthomas commentonartificialintelligenceingastroenterologyastateoftheartreview
AT koulaouzidisanastasios commentonartificialintelligenceingastroenterologyastateoftheartreview
AT baatrupgunnar commentonartificialintelligenceingastroenterologyastateoftheartreview