Cargando…

Molecular weight distribution of raw and catalytic fast pyrolysis oils: comparison of analytical methodologies

Comprehensive analysis of the molecular weight distribution of raw and catalytic fast pyrolysis oils derived from biomass remains a key technical hurdle to understanding oil quality as it relates to downstream use and multiple methods may be necessary to accurately represent all components present....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harman-Ware, Anne E., Orton, Kellene, Deng, Chris, Kenrick, Sophia, Carpenter, Daniel, Ferrell, Jack R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9048943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35492657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9ra09726k
_version_ 1784696035196534784
author Harman-Ware, Anne E.
Orton, Kellene
Deng, Chris
Kenrick, Sophia
Carpenter, Daniel
Ferrell, Jack R.
author_facet Harman-Ware, Anne E.
Orton, Kellene
Deng, Chris
Kenrick, Sophia
Carpenter, Daniel
Ferrell, Jack R.
author_sort Harman-Ware, Anne E.
collection PubMed
description Comprehensive analysis of the molecular weight distribution of raw and catalytic fast pyrolysis oils derived from biomass remains a key technical hurdle to understanding oil quality as it relates to downstream use and multiple methods may be necessary to accurately represent all components present. Here, we report the molecular weight distribution metrics of fast pyrolysis (FP) and catalytic fast pyrolysis (CFP) oils as determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) combined with UV-diode array (UV), differential refractive index (RI), and multi-angle laser light scattering (MALS) detection. The measured molar mass distributions revealed that FP oil consisted of a higher proportion of larger products relative to the low molecular weight products contained in the CFP oil. GPC/RI and UV methods showed FP oil to have higher weight-average molecular weight (M(w)) and number-average molecular weight (M(n)) than CFP oil based on elution time. However, GPC/MALS, determined the two oils to have similar overall molecular weight distribution metrics (M(w) and M(n)) and yielded values significantly higher than those determined by RI and UV detectors relative to external standards. Overall, the use of a multiple detection GPC method could enable a more accurate comparison and determination of true molecular weight metrics of bio-oils.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9048943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90489432022-04-28 Molecular weight distribution of raw and catalytic fast pyrolysis oils: comparison of analytical methodologies Harman-Ware, Anne E. Orton, Kellene Deng, Chris Kenrick, Sophia Carpenter, Daniel Ferrell, Jack R. RSC Adv Chemistry Comprehensive analysis of the molecular weight distribution of raw and catalytic fast pyrolysis oils derived from biomass remains a key technical hurdle to understanding oil quality as it relates to downstream use and multiple methods may be necessary to accurately represent all components present. Here, we report the molecular weight distribution metrics of fast pyrolysis (FP) and catalytic fast pyrolysis (CFP) oils as determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) combined with UV-diode array (UV), differential refractive index (RI), and multi-angle laser light scattering (MALS) detection. The measured molar mass distributions revealed that FP oil consisted of a higher proportion of larger products relative to the low molecular weight products contained in the CFP oil. GPC/RI and UV methods showed FP oil to have higher weight-average molecular weight (M(w)) and number-average molecular weight (M(n)) than CFP oil based on elution time. However, GPC/MALS, determined the two oils to have similar overall molecular weight distribution metrics (M(w) and M(n)) and yielded values significantly higher than those determined by RI and UV detectors relative to external standards. Overall, the use of a multiple detection GPC method could enable a more accurate comparison and determination of true molecular weight metrics of bio-oils. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9048943/ /pubmed/35492657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9ra09726k Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Harman-Ware, Anne E.
Orton, Kellene
Deng, Chris
Kenrick, Sophia
Carpenter, Daniel
Ferrell, Jack R.
Molecular weight distribution of raw and catalytic fast pyrolysis oils: comparison of analytical methodologies
title Molecular weight distribution of raw and catalytic fast pyrolysis oils: comparison of analytical methodologies
title_full Molecular weight distribution of raw and catalytic fast pyrolysis oils: comparison of analytical methodologies
title_fullStr Molecular weight distribution of raw and catalytic fast pyrolysis oils: comparison of analytical methodologies
title_full_unstemmed Molecular weight distribution of raw and catalytic fast pyrolysis oils: comparison of analytical methodologies
title_short Molecular weight distribution of raw and catalytic fast pyrolysis oils: comparison of analytical methodologies
title_sort molecular weight distribution of raw and catalytic fast pyrolysis oils: comparison of analytical methodologies
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9048943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35492657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9ra09726k
work_keys_str_mv AT harmanwareannee molecularweightdistributionofrawandcatalyticfastpyrolysisoilscomparisonofanalyticalmethodologies
AT ortonkellene molecularweightdistributionofrawandcatalyticfastpyrolysisoilscomparisonofanalyticalmethodologies
AT dengchris molecularweightdistributionofrawandcatalyticfastpyrolysisoilscomparisonofanalyticalmethodologies
AT kenricksophia molecularweightdistributionofrawandcatalyticfastpyrolysisoilscomparisonofanalyticalmethodologies
AT carpenterdaniel molecularweightdistributionofrawandcatalyticfastpyrolysisoilscomparisonofanalyticalmethodologies
AT ferrelljackr molecularweightdistributionofrawandcatalyticfastpyrolysisoilscomparisonofanalyticalmethodologies