Cargando…

An evaluation to determine if reading the mind in the eyes scores can be improved through training

The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) has received attention due to its correlation with collective intelligence. If the RMET is a marker of collective intelligence, training to improve RMET could result in better teamwork, whether for human-human or human-AI (artificial intelligence) in comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stonewall, Jacklin Hope, Ouverson, Kaitlyn M., Helgerson, Andrina, Gilbert, Stephen B., Dorneich, Michael C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35482660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267579
_version_ 1784696121476513792
author Stonewall, Jacklin Hope
Ouverson, Kaitlyn M.
Helgerson, Andrina
Gilbert, Stephen B.
Dorneich, Michael C.
author_facet Stonewall, Jacklin Hope
Ouverson, Kaitlyn M.
Helgerson, Andrina
Gilbert, Stephen B.
Dorneich, Michael C.
author_sort Stonewall, Jacklin Hope
collection PubMed
description The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) has received attention due to its correlation with collective intelligence. If the RMET is a marker of collective intelligence, training to improve RMET could result in better teamwork, whether for human-human or human-AI (artificial intelligence) in composition. While training on related skills has proven effective in the literature, RMET training has not been studied. This research evaluates the development of RMET training, testing the impact of two training conditions (Naturalistic Training and Repeated RMET Practice) compared to a control. There were no significant differences in RMET scores due to training, but speed of response was positively correlated to RMET score for high-scoring participants. Both management professionals and AI creators looking to cultivate team skill through the application of the RMET may need to reconsider their tool selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9049333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90493332022-04-29 An evaluation to determine if reading the mind in the eyes scores can be improved through training Stonewall, Jacklin Hope Ouverson, Kaitlyn M. Helgerson, Andrina Gilbert, Stephen B. Dorneich, Michael C. PLoS One Research Article The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) has received attention due to its correlation with collective intelligence. If the RMET is a marker of collective intelligence, training to improve RMET could result in better teamwork, whether for human-human or human-AI (artificial intelligence) in composition. While training on related skills has proven effective in the literature, RMET training has not been studied. This research evaluates the development of RMET training, testing the impact of two training conditions (Naturalistic Training and Repeated RMET Practice) compared to a control. There were no significant differences in RMET scores due to training, but speed of response was positively correlated to RMET score for high-scoring participants. Both management professionals and AI creators looking to cultivate team skill through the application of the RMET may need to reconsider their tool selection. Public Library of Science 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9049333/ /pubmed/35482660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267579 Text en © 2022 Stonewall et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stonewall, Jacklin Hope
Ouverson, Kaitlyn M.
Helgerson, Andrina
Gilbert, Stephen B.
Dorneich, Michael C.
An evaluation to determine if reading the mind in the eyes scores can be improved through training
title An evaluation to determine if reading the mind in the eyes scores can be improved through training
title_full An evaluation to determine if reading the mind in the eyes scores can be improved through training
title_fullStr An evaluation to determine if reading the mind in the eyes scores can be improved through training
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation to determine if reading the mind in the eyes scores can be improved through training
title_short An evaluation to determine if reading the mind in the eyes scores can be improved through training
title_sort evaluation to determine if reading the mind in the eyes scores can be improved through training
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35482660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267579
work_keys_str_mv AT stonewalljacklinhope anevaluationtodetermineifreadingthemindintheeyesscorescanbeimprovedthroughtraining
AT ouversonkaitlynm anevaluationtodetermineifreadingthemindintheeyesscorescanbeimprovedthroughtraining
AT helgersonandrina anevaluationtodetermineifreadingthemindintheeyesscorescanbeimprovedthroughtraining
AT gilbertstephenb anevaluationtodetermineifreadingthemindintheeyesscorescanbeimprovedthroughtraining
AT dorneichmichaelc anevaluationtodetermineifreadingthemindintheeyesscorescanbeimprovedthroughtraining
AT stonewalljacklinhope evaluationtodetermineifreadingthemindintheeyesscorescanbeimprovedthroughtraining
AT ouversonkaitlynm evaluationtodetermineifreadingthemindintheeyesscorescanbeimprovedthroughtraining
AT helgersonandrina evaluationtodetermineifreadingthemindintheeyesscorescanbeimprovedthroughtraining
AT gilbertstephenb evaluationtodetermineifreadingthemindintheeyesscorescanbeimprovedthroughtraining
AT dorneichmichaelc evaluationtodetermineifreadingthemindintheeyesscorescanbeimprovedthroughtraining