Cargando…
An evaluation to determine if reading the mind in the eyes scores can be improved through training
The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) has received attention due to its correlation with collective intelligence. If the RMET is a marker of collective intelligence, training to improve RMET could result in better teamwork, whether for human-human or human-AI (artificial intelligence) in comp...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35482660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267579 |
_version_ | 1784696121476513792 |
---|---|
author | Stonewall, Jacklin Hope Ouverson, Kaitlyn M. Helgerson, Andrina Gilbert, Stephen B. Dorneich, Michael C. |
author_facet | Stonewall, Jacklin Hope Ouverson, Kaitlyn M. Helgerson, Andrina Gilbert, Stephen B. Dorneich, Michael C. |
author_sort | Stonewall, Jacklin Hope |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) has received attention due to its correlation with collective intelligence. If the RMET is a marker of collective intelligence, training to improve RMET could result in better teamwork, whether for human-human or human-AI (artificial intelligence) in composition. While training on related skills has proven effective in the literature, RMET training has not been studied. This research evaluates the development of RMET training, testing the impact of two training conditions (Naturalistic Training and Repeated RMET Practice) compared to a control. There were no significant differences in RMET scores due to training, but speed of response was positively correlated to RMET score for high-scoring participants. Both management professionals and AI creators looking to cultivate team skill through the application of the RMET may need to reconsider their tool selection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9049333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90493332022-04-29 An evaluation to determine if reading the mind in the eyes scores can be improved through training Stonewall, Jacklin Hope Ouverson, Kaitlyn M. Helgerson, Andrina Gilbert, Stephen B. Dorneich, Michael C. PLoS One Research Article The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) has received attention due to its correlation with collective intelligence. If the RMET is a marker of collective intelligence, training to improve RMET could result in better teamwork, whether for human-human or human-AI (artificial intelligence) in composition. While training on related skills has proven effective in the literature, RMET training has not been studied. This research evaluates the development of RMET training, testing the impact of two training conditions (Naturalistic Training and Repeated RMET Practice) compared to a control. There were no significant differences in RMET scores due to training, but speed of response was positively correlated to RMET score for high-scoring participants. Both management professionals and AI creators looking to cultivate team skill through the application of the RMET may need to reconsider their tool selection. Public Library of Science 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9049333/ /pubmed/35482660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267579 Text en © 2022 Stonewall et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Stonewall, Jacklin Hope Ouverson, Kaitlyn M. Helgerson, Andrina Gilbert, Stephen B. Dorneich, Michael C. An evaluation to determine if reading the mind in the eyes scores can be improved through training |
title | An evaluation to determine if reading the mind in the eyes scores can be improved through training |
title_full | An evaluation to determine if reading the mind in the eyes scores can be improved through training |
title_fullStr | An evaluation to determine if reading the mind in the eyes scores can be improved through training |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation to determine if reading the mind in the eyes scores can be improved through training |
title_short | An evaluation to determine if reading the mind in the eyes scores can be improved through training |
title_sort | evaluation to determine if reading the mind in the eyes scores can be improved through training |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35482660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267579 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stonewalljacklinhope anevaluationtodetermineifreadingthemindintheeyesscorescanbeimprovedthroughtraining AT ouversonkaitlynm anevaluationtodetermineifreadingthemindintheeyesscorescanbeimprovedthroughtraining AT helgersonandrina anevaluationtodetermineifreadingthemindintheeyesscorescanbeimprovedthroughtraining AT gilbertstephenb anevaluationtodetermineifreadingthemindintheeyesscorescanbeimprovedthroughtraining AT dorneichmichaelc anevaluationtodetermineifreadingthemindintheeyesscorescanbeimprovedthroughtraining AT stonewalljacklinhope evaluationtodetermineifreadingthemindintheeyesscorescanbeimprovedthroughtraining AT ouversonkaitlynm evaluationtodetermineifreadingthemindintheeyesscorescanbeimprovedthroughtraining AT helgersonandrina evaluationtodetermineifreadingthemindintheeyesscorescanbeimprovedthroughtraining AT gilbertstephenb evaluationtodetermineifreadingthemindintheeyesscorescanbeimprovedthroughtraining AT dorneichmichaelc evaluationtodetermineifreadingthemindintheeyesscorescanbeimprovedthroughtraining |