Cargando…
Evaluation of Dermatoglyphic Features of Type 2 Diabetic Patients as Compared to Non-Diabetics Attending Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia
BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a complex metabolic disorder characterized by persistent hyperglycemia resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action, or both. Type 2 DM has a strong hereditary background. A study of the dermatoglyphic features can help in the early identification...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35494530 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S356728 |
_version_ | 1784696203706892288 |
---|---|
author | Tadesse, Amanuel Gebremickael, Abinet Merid, Melkamu Wondmagegn, Habtamu Melaku, Tesfaye Ayele, Tsegazeab Meskele, Simeon Esubalew, Habtamu Birhanu, Asaminew |
author_facet | Tadesse, Amanuel Gebremickael, Abinet Merid, Melkamu Wondmagegn, Habtamu Melaku, Tesfaye Ayele, Tsegazeab Meskele, Simeon Esubalew, Habtamu Birhanu, Asaminew |
author_sort | Tadesse, Amanuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a complex metabolic disorder characterized by persistent hyperglycemia resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action, or both. Type 2 DM has a strong hereditary background. A study of the dermatoglyphic features can help in the early identification of people with a genetic predisposition to develop type 2 DM. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The study was aimed to compare the finger and palmar dermatoglyphics features in type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients and to evaluate the association with other variables. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: Institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted in one referral hospital and three primary hospitals located in Gedeo Zone. Three hundred ninety study participants (130 type 2 diabetics and 260 non-diabetics) from adult OPD and diabetic clinics were included in the study. The association among different dermatoglyphics variables was analyzed using the chi-square test. An independent t-test was conducted to analyze the mean difference and to test the significance of numerical variables. A statistically significant association was declared at P-value <0.05. RESULTS: In the present study, a total of 3900 digits (1300 from type 2 diabetic and 2600 non-diabetic) were analyzed for distribution of digital dermatoglyphic patterns. Loop pattern is found to be the commonest in both study groups with a prevalence of 65.8% and 60.7% among type 2 diabetics and non-diabetics, respectively. Both the right-left axial tri-radius angle was significantly higher in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients compared to non-diabetic study participants. Total finger ridge counts and absolute finger ridge counts showed no significant difference in both groups. CONCLUSION: The study revealed Loop pattern was more frequent in type 2 DM compared to non-diabetic study participants. Whorl type was more common than arch type in non-diabetic patients compared to type 2 DM groups. The result also showed tri-radius angle is significantly wider in diabetic groups in both hands. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9049718 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90497182022-04-29 Evaluation of Dermatoglyphic Features of Type 2 Diabetic Patients as Compared to Non-Diabetics Attending Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia Tadesse, Amanuel Gebremickael, Abinet Merid, Melkamu Wondmagegn, Habtamu Melaku, Tesfaye Ayele, Tsegazeab Meskele, Simeon Esubalew, Habtamu Birhanu, Asaminew Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Original Research BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a complex metabolic disorder characterized by persistent hyperglycemia resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action, or both. Type 2 DM has a strong hereditary background. A study of the dermatoglyphic features can help in the early identification of people with a genetic predisposition to develop type 2 DM. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The study was aimed to compare the finger and palmar dermatoglyphics features in type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients and to evaluate the association with other variables. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: Institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted in one referral hospital and three primary hospitals located in Gedeo Zone. Three hundred ninety study participants (130 type 2 diabetics and 260 non-diabetics) from adult OPD and diabetic clinics were included in the study. The association among different dermatoglyphics variables was analyzed using the chi-square test. An independent t-test was conducted to analyze the mean difference and to test the significance of numerical variables. A statistically significant association was declared at P-value <0.05. RESULTS: In the present study, a total of 3900 digits (1300 from type 2 diabetic and 2600 non-diabetic) were analyzed for distribution of digital dermatoglyphic patterns. Loop pattern is found to be the commonest in both study groups with a prevalence of 65.8% and 60.7% among type 2 diabetics and non-diabetics, respectively. Both the right-left axial tri-radius angle was significantly higher in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients compared to non-diabetic study participants. Total finger ridge counts and absolute finger ridge counts showed no significant difference in both groups. CONCLUSION: The study revealed Loop pattern was more frequent in type 2 DM compared to non-diabetic study participants. Whorl type was more common than arch type in non-diabetic patients compared to type 2 DM groups. The result also showed tri-radius angle is significantly wider in diabetic groups in both hands. Dove 2022-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9049718/ /pubmed/35494530 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S356728 Text en © 2022 Tadesse et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Tadesse, Amanuel Gebremickael, Abinet Merid, Melkamu Wondmagegn, Habtamu Melaku, Tesfaye Ayele, Tsegazeab Meskele, Simeon Esubalew, Habtamu Birhanu, Asaminew Evaluation of Dermatoglyphic Features of Type 2 Diabetic Patients as Compared to Non-Diabetics Attending Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia |
title | Evaluation of Dermatoglyphic Features of Type 2 Diabetic Patients as Compared to Non-Diabetics Attending Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia |
title_full | Evaluation of Dermatoglyphic Features of Type 2 Diabetic Patients as Compared to Non-Diabetics Attending Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Dermatoglyphic Features of Type 2 Diabetic Patients as Compared to Non-Diabetics Attending Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Dermatoglyphic Features of Type 2 Diabetic Patients as Compared to Non-Diabetics Attending Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia |
title_short | Evaluation of Dermatoglyphic Features of Type 2 Diabetic Patients as Compared to Non-Diabetics Attending Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia |
title_sort | evaluation of dermatoglyphic features of type 2 diabetic patients as compared to non-diabetics attending hospitals in southern ethiopia |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35494530 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S356728 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tadesseamanuel evaluationofdermatoglyphicfeaturesoftype2diabeticpatientsascomparedtonondiabeticsattendinghospitalsinsouthernethiopia AT gebremickaelabinet evaluationofdermatoglyphicfeaturesoftype2diabeticpatientsascomparedtonondiabeticsattendinghospitalsinsouthernethiopia AT meridmelkamu evaluationofdermatoglyphicfeaturesoftype2diabeticpatientsascomparedtonondiabeticsattendinghospitalsinsouthernethiopia AT wondmagegnhabtamu evaluationofdermatoglyphicfeaturesoftype2diabeticpatientsascomparedtonondiabeticsattendinghospitalsinsouthernethiopia AT melakutesfaye evaluationofdermatoglyphicfeaturesoftype2diabeticpatientsascomparedtonondiabeticsattendinghospitalsinsouthernethiopia AT ayeletsegazeab evaluationofdermatoglyphicfeaturesoftype2diabeticpatientsascomparedtonondiabeticsattendinghospitalsinsouthernethiopia AT meskelesimeon evaluationofdermatoglyphicfeaturesoftype2diabeticpatientsascomparedtonondiabeticsattendinghospitalsinsouthernethiopia AT esubalewhabtamu evaluationofdermatoglyphicfeaturesoftype2diabeticpatientsascomparedtonondiabeticsattendinghospitalsinsouthernethiopia AT birhanuasaminew evaluationofdermatoglyphicfeaturesoftype2diabeticpatientsascomparedtonondiabeticsattendinghospitalsinsouthernethiopia |