Cargando…

Evaluation of Dermatoglyphic Features of Type 2 Diabetic Patients as Compared to Non-Diabetics Attending Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a complex metabolic disorder characterized by persistent hyperglycemia resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action, or both. Type 2 DM has a strong hereditary background. A study of the dermatoglyphic features can help in the early identification...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tadesse, Amanuel, Gebremickael, Abinet, Merid, Melkamu, Wondmagegn, Habtamu, Melaku, Tesfaye, Ayele, Tsegazeab, Meskele, Simeon, Esubalew, Habtamu, Birhanu, Asaminew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35494530
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S356728
_version_ 1784696203706892288
author Tadesse, Amanuel
Gebremickael, Abinet
Merid, Melkamu
Wondmagegn, Habtamu
Melaku, Tesfaye
Ayele, Tsegazeab
Meskele, Simeon
Esubalew, Habtamu
Birhanu, Asaminew
author_facet Tadesse, Amanuel
Gebremickael, Abinet
Merid, Melkamu
Wondmagegn, Habtamu
Melaku, Tesfaye
Ayele, Tsegazeab
Meskele, Simeon
Esubalew, Habtamu
Birhanu, Asaminew
author_sort Tadesse, Amanuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a complex metabolic disorder characterized by persistent hyperglycemia resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action, or both. Type 2 DM has a strong hereditary background. A study of the dermatoglyphic features can help in the early identification of people with a genetic predisposition to develop type 2 DM. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The study was aimed to compare the finger and palmar dermatoglyphics features in type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients and to evaluate the association with other variables. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: Institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted in one referral hospital and three primary hospitals located in Gedeo Zone. Three hundred ninety study participants (130 type 2 diabetics and 260 non-diabetics) from adult OPD and diabetic clinics were included in the study. The association among different dermatoglyphics variables was analyzed using the chi-square test. An independent t-test was conducted to analyze the mean difference and to test the significance of numerical variables. A statistically significant association was declared at P-value <0.05. RESULTS: In the present study, a total of 3900 digits (1300 from type 2 diabetic and 2600 non-diabetic) were analyzed for distribution of digital dermatoglyphic patterns. Loop pattern is found to be the commonest in both study groups with a prevalence of 65.8% and 60.7% among type 2 diabetics and non-diabetics, respectively. Both the right-left axial tri-radius angle was significantly higher in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients compared to non-diabetic study participants. Total finger ridge counts and absolute finger ridge counts showed no significant difference in both groups. CONCLUSION: The study revealed Loop pattern was more frequent in type 2 DM compared to non-diabetic study participants. Whorl type was more common than arch type in non-diabetic patients compared to type 2 DM groups. The result also showed tri-radius angle is significantly wider in diabetic groups in both hands.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9049718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90497182022-04-29 Evaluation of Dermatoglyphic Features of Type 2 Diabetic Patients as Compared to Non-Diabetics Attending Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia Tadesse, Amanuel Gebremickael, Abinet Merid, Melkamu Wondmagegn, Habtamu Melaku, Tesfaye Ayele, Tsegazeab Meskele, Simeon Esubalew, Habtamu Birhanu, Asaminew Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Original Research BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a complex metabolic disorder characterized by persistent hyperglycemia resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action, or both. Type 2 DM has a strong hereditary background. A study of the dermatoglyphic features can help in the early identification of people with a genetic predisposition to develop type 2 DM. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The study was aimed to compare the finger and palmar dermatoglyphics features in type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients and to evaluate the association with other variables. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: Institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted in one referral hospital and three primary hospitals located in Gedeo Zone. Three hundred ninety study participants (130 type 2 diabetics and 260 non-diabetics) from adult OPD and diabetic clinics were included in the study. The association among different dermatoglyphics variables was analyzed using the chi-square test. An independent t-test was conducted to analyze the mean difference and to test the significance of numerical variables. A statistically significant association was declared at P-value <0.05. RESULTS: In the present study, a total of 3900 digits (1300 from type 2 diabetic and 2600 non-diabetic) were analyzed for distribution of digital dermatoglyphic patterns. Loop pattern is found to be the commonest in both study groups with a prevalence of 65.8% and 60.7% among type 2 diabetics and non-diabetics, respectively. Both the right-left axial tri-radius angle was significantly higher in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients compared to non-diabetic study participants. Total finger ridge counts and absolute finger ridge counts showed no significant difference in both groups. CONCLUSION: The study revealed Loop pattern was more frequent in type 2 DM compared to non-diabetic study participants. Whorl type was more common than arch type in non-diabetic patients compared to type 2 DM groups. The result also showed tri-radius angle is significantly wider in diabetic groups in both hands. Dove 2022-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9049718/ /pubmed/35494530 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S356728 Text en © 2022 Tadesse et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Tadesse, Amanuel
Gebremickael, Abinet
Merid, Melkamu
Wondmagegn, Habtamu
Melaku, Tesfaye
Ayele, Tsegazeab
Meskele, Simeon
Esubalew, Habtamu
Birhanu, Asaminew
Evaluation of Dermatoglyphic Features of Type 2 Diabetic Patients as Compared to Non-Diabetics Attending Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia
title Evaluation of Dermatoglyphic Features of Type 2 Diabetic Patients as Compared to Non-Diabetics Attending Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia
title_full Evaluation of Dermatoglyphic Features of Type 2 Diabetic Patients as Compared to Non-Diabetics Attending Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia
title_fullStr Evaluation of Dermatoglyphic Features of Type 2 Diabetic Patients as Compared to Non-Diabetics Attending Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Dermatoglyphic Features of Type 2 Diabetic Patients as Compared to Non-Diabetics Attending Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia
title_short Evaluation of Dermatoglyphic Features of Type 2 Diabetic Patients as Compared to Non-Diabetics Attending Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia
title_sort evaluation of dermatoglyphic features of type 2 diabetic patients as compared to non-diabetics attending hospitals in southern ethiopia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35494530
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S356728
work_keys_str_mv AT tadesseamanuel evaluationofdermatoglyphicfeaturesoftype2diabeticpatientsascomparedtonondiabeticsattendinghospitalsinsouthernethiopia
AT gebremickaelabinet evaluationofdermatoglyphicfeaturesoftype2diabeticpatientsascomparedtonondiabeticsattendinghospitalsinsouthernethiopia
AT meridmelkamu evaluationofdermatoglyphicfeaturesoftype2diabeticpatientsascomparedtonondiabeticsattendinghospitalsinsouthernethiopia
AT wondmagegnhabtamu evaluationofdermatoglyphicfeaturesoftype2diabeticpatientsascomparedtonondiabeticsattendinghospitalsinsouthernethiopia
AT melakutesfaye evaluationofdermatoglyphicfeaturesoftype2diabeticpatientsascomparedtonondiabeticsattendinghospitalsinsouthernethiopia
AT ayeletsegazeab evaluationofdermatoglyphicfeaturesoftype2diabeticpatientsascomparedtonondiabeticsattendinghospitalsinsouthernethiopia
AT meskelesimeon evaluationofdermatoglyphicfeaturesoftype2diabeticpatientsascomparedtonondiabeticsattendinghospitalsinsouthernethiopia
AT esubalewhabtamu evaluationofdermatoglyphicfeaturesoftype2diabeticpatientsascomparedtonondiabeticsattendinghospitalsinsouthernethiopia
AT birhanuasaminew evaluationofdermatoglyphicfeaturesoftype2diabeticpatientsascomparedtonondiabeticsattendinghospitalsinsouthernethiopia