Cargando…

Selective recovery of zinc from goethite residue in the zinc industry using deep-eutectic solvents

Several deep-eutectic solvents (DESs) were tested for the valorisation of goethite residue produced by the zinc industry. The objective of the work was to selectively recover zinc from the iron-rich matrix using deep-eutectic solvents as lixiviants. The effect of the type of hydrogen bond donor and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodriguez Rodriguez, Nerea, Machiels, Lieven, Onghena, Bieke, Spooren, Jeroen, Binnemans, Koen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35493887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra00277a
_version_ 1784696228789878784
author Rodriguez Rodriguez, Nerea
Machiels, Lieven
Onghena, Bieke
Spooren, Jeroen
Binnemans, Koen
author_facet Rodriguez Rodriguez, Nerea
Machiels, Lieven
Onghena, Bieke
Spooren, Jeroen
Binnemans, Koen
author_sort Rodriguez Rodriguez, Nerea
collection PubMed
description Several deep-eutectic solvents (DESs) were tested for the valorisation of goethite residue produced by the zinc industry. The objective of the work was to selectively recover zinc from the iron-rich matrix using deep-eutectic solvents as lixiviants. The effect of the type of hydrogen bond donor and hydrogen bond acceptor of the deep-eutectic solvent on the leaching efficiency was studied. Levulinic acid–choline chloride (x(ChCl) = 0.33) (LevA–ChCl) could selectively leach zinc from the iron-rich matrix, and it was selected as the best-performing system to be used in further study. The leaching process was optimised in terms of temperature, contact time, liquid-to-solid ratio and water content of the deep-eutectic solvent. The role of the choline cation on the leaching process was investigated by considering the leaching properties of a LevA–CaCl(2) mixture. The goethite residue was also leached with pure levulinic acid. The results were compared to a purely hydrometallurgical approach using sulphuric acid leaching. Leaching with LevA–ChCl resulted in higher selectivity compared to the conventional “hot leaching” with 80 g L(−1) sulphuric acid. Furthermore, a slightly higher zinc recovery and comparable selectivity for zinc over iron were achieved with LevA–ChCl compared to conventional “neutral leaching” with 10 g L(−1) sulphuric acid.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9049832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90498322022-04-29 Selective recovery of zinc from goethite residue in the zinc industry using deep-eutectic solvents Rodriguez Rodriguez, Nerea Machiels, Lieven Onghena, Bieke Spooren, Jeroen Binnemans, Koen RSC Adv Chemistry Several deep-eutectic solvents (DESs) were tested for the valorisation of goethite residue produced by the zinc industry. The objective of the work was to selectively recover zinc from the iron-rich matrix using deep-eutectic solvents as lixiviants. The effect of the type of hydrogen bond donor and hydrogen bond acceptor of the deep-eutectic solvent on the leaching efficiency was studied. Levulinic acid–choline chloride (x(ChCl) = 0.33) (LevA–ChCl) could selectively leach zinc from the iron-rich matrix, and it was selected as the best-performing system to be used in further study. The leaching process was optimised in terms of temperature, contact time, liquid-to-solid ratio and water content of the deep-eutectic solvent. The role of the choline cation on the leaching process was investigated by considering the leaching properties of a LevA–CaCl(2) mixture. The goethite residue was also leached with pure levulinic acid. The results were compared to a purely hydrometallurgical approach using sulphuric acid leaching. Leaching with LevA–ChCl resulted in higher selectivity compared to the conventional “hot leaching” with 80 g L(−1) sulphuric acid. Furthermore, a slightly higher zinc recovery and comparable selectivity for zinc over iron were achieved with LevA–ChCl compared to conventional “neutral leaching” with 10 g L(−1) sulphuric acid. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9049832/ /pubmed/35493887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra00277a Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Rodriguez Rodriguez, Nerea
Machiels, Lieven
Onghena, Bieke
Spooren, Jeroen
Binnemans, Koen
Selective recovery of zinc from goethite residue in the zinc industry using deep-eutectic solvents
title Selective recovery of zinc from goethite residue in the zinc industry using deep-eutectic solvents
title_full Selective recovery of zinc from goethite residue in the zinc industry using deep-eutectic solvents
title_fullStr Selective recovery of zinc from goethite residue in the zinc industry using deep-eutectic solvents
title_full_unstemmed Selective recovery of zinc from goethite residue in the zinc industry using deep-eutectic solvents
title_short Selective recovery of zinc from goethite residue in the zinc industry using deep-eutectic solvents
title_sort selective recovery of zinc from goethite residue in the zinc industry using deep-eutectic solvents
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35493887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra00277a
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguezrodrigueznerea selectiverecoveryofzincfromgoethiteresidueinthezincindustryusingdeepeutecticsolvents
AT machielslieven selectiverecoveryofzincfromgoethiteresidueinthezincindustryusingdeepeutecticsolvents
AT onghenabieke selectiverecoveryofzincfromgoethiteresidueinthezincindustryusingdeepeutecticsolvents
AT spoorenjeroen selectiverecoveryofzincfromgoethiteresidueinthezincindustryusingdeepeutecticsolvents
AT binnemanskoen selectiverecoveryofzincfromgoethiteresidueinthezincindustryusingdeepeutecticsolvents