Cargando…

Analysis of the Mechanism of Ureproofing Technology and Postlaparoscopy on Patients with Urology and Infection

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of ureteroscopy and retrolaparoscopy on urinary calculi and infection. METHOD: A total of 64 patients with urinary calculi and infection who received treatment in our hospital from June 2018 to January 2018 were selected. According to the different treatment methods,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Si, Zhang, Yuanfeng, Shen, Peilin, Huang, Zhuangcheng, Lin, Mingen, Huang, Jiansheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9050273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35494509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4373416
_version_ 1784696324822663168
author Chen, Si
Zhang, Yuanfeng
Shen, Peilin
Huang, Zhuangcheng
Lin, Mingen
Huang, Jiansheng
author_facet Chen, Si
Zhang, Yuanfeng
Shen, Peilin
Huang, Zhuangcheng
Lin, Mingen
Huang, Jiansheng
author_sort Chen, Si
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of ureteroscopy and retrolaparoscopy on urinary calculi and infection. METHOD: A total of 64 patients with urinary calculi and infection who received treatment in our hospital from June 2018 to January 2018 were selected. According to the different treatment methods, they were divided into two groups: a control group and a study group. The study group was treated with laparoscopic ureteroscopy, and the control group was treated with ureteroscopy. The surgical results, complications, renal function, stress response, and inflammatory reaction were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the study group stone clearance rate was higher, the surgical time was shorter (P < 0.05); the incidence of complications in the study group (23.3%) was lower than that in the control group (5.9%) (P < 0.05); there was no significant difference in kidney function indicators before treatment (P > 0.05); after treatment, the SCR, BUN, NGAL, and Cys-C indicators of the two groups were significantly increased. Compared with the control group, the study group change was more obvious, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); after treatment, the two sets of stress response indicators were significantly increased, but relative to the control group, the study group stress response indicator was lower (P < 0.05); before treatment, there was no significant difference in inflammatory factors (P > 0.05); after treatment, the two sets of inflammatory factor levels were significantly increased, but relative to the control group, the study group was lower (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In the clinical treatment of urinary stones, ureteroscopy technology and the laparoscopic technique have played an important role. But the laparoscopic technique is shorter, the stone clearance is higher, and the patient's renal function can be improved, and the patient is postoperative. The stress reaction should be small. Therefore, in the clinical treatment of urinary stones and infection, laparoscopic technical treatment is worth promoting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9050273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90502732022-04-29 Analysis of the Mechanism of Ureproofing Technology and Postlaparoscopy on Patients with Urology and Infection Chen, Si Zhang, Yuanfeng Shen, Peilin Huang, Zhuangcheng Lin, Mingen Huang, Jiansheng J Healthc Eng Research Article OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of ureteroscopy and retrolaparoscopy on urinary calculi and infection. METHOD: A total of 64 patients with urinary calculi and infection who received treatment in our hospital from June 2018 to January 2018 were selected. According to the different treatment methods, they were divided into two groups: a control group and a study group. The study group was treated with laparoscopic ureteroscopy, and the control group was treated with ureteroscopy. The surgical results, complications, renal function, stress response, and inflammatory reaction were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the study group stone clearance rate was higher, the surgical time was shorter (P < 0.05); the incidence of complications in the study group (23.3%) was lower than that in the control group (5.9%) (P < 0.05); there was no significant difference in kidney function indicators before treatment (P > 0.05); after treatment, the SCR, BUN, NGAL, and Cys-C indicators of the two groups were significantly increased. Compared with the control group, the study group change was more obvious, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); after treatment, the two sets of stress response indicators were significantly increased, but relative to the control group, the study group stress response indicator was lower (P < 0.05); before treatment, there was no significant difference in inflammatory factors (P > 0.05); after treatment, the two sets of inflammatory factor levels were significantly increased, but relative to the control group, the study group was lower (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In the clinical treatment of urinary stones, ureteroscopy technology and the laparoscopic technique have played an important role. But the laparoscopic technique is shorter, the stone clearance is higher, and the patient's renal function can be improved, and the patient is postoperative. The stress reaction should be small. Therefore, in the clinical treatment of urinary stones and infection, laparoscopic technical treatment is worth promoting. Hindawi 2022-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9050273/ /pubmed/35494509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4373416 Text en Copyright © 2022 Si Chen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Si
Zhang, Yuanfeng
Shen, Peilin
Huang, Zhuangcheng
Lin, Mingen
Huang, Jiansheng
Analysis of the Mechanism of Ureproofing Technology and Postlaparoscopy on Patients with Urology and Infection
title Analysis of the Mechanism of Ureproofing Technology and Postlaparoscopy on Patients with Urology and Infection
title_full Analysis of the Mechanism of Ureproofing Technology and Postlaparoscopy on Patients with Urology and Infection
title_fullStr Analysis of the Mechanism of Ureproofing Technology and Postlaparoscopy on Patients with Urology and Infection
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the Mechanism of Ureproofing Technology and Postlaparoscopy on Patients with Urology and Infection
title_short Analysis of the Mechanism of Ureproofing Technology and Postlaparoscopy on Patients with Urology and Infection
title_sort analysis of the mechanism of ureproofing technology and postlaparoscopy on patients with urology and infection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9050273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35494509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4373416
work_keys_str_mv AT chensi analysisofthemechanismofureproofingtechnologyandpostlaparoscopyonpatientswithurologyandinfection
AT zhangyuanfeng analysisofthemechanismofureproofingtechnologyandpostlaparoscopyonpatientswithurologyandinfection
AT shenpeilin analysisofthemechanismofureproofingtechnologyandpostlaparoscopyonpatientswithurologyandinfection
AT huangzhuangcheng analysisofthemechanismofureproofingtechnologyandpostlaparoscopyonpatientswithurologyandinfection
AT linmingen analysisofthemechanismofureproofingtechnologyandpostlaparoscopyonpatientswithurologyandinfection
AT huangjiansheng analysisofthemechanismofureproofingtechnologyandpostlaparoscopyonpatientswithurologyandinfection