Cargando…

A randomised study to assess the nicotine pharmacokinetics of an oral nicotine pouch and two nicotine replacement therapy products

Nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs) are intended for short-term use to help cigarette smokers to quit. Some smokers find NRTs ineffective or seek a more satisfactory source of nicotine. Tobacco-free oral nicotine pouch (NP) products have emerged as a potential reduced risk product compared with ci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azzopardi, David, Ebajemito, James, McEwan, Michael, Camacho, Oscar M., Thissen, Jesse, Hardie, George, Voisine, Richard, Mullard, Gavin, Cohen, Zvi, Murphy, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9050656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35484309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10544-x
_version_ 1784696416368590848
author Azzopardi, David
Ebajemito, James
McEwan, Michael
Camacho, Oscar M.
Thissen, Jesse
Hardie, George
Voisine, Richard
Mullard, Gavin
Cohen, Zvi
Murphy, James
author_facet Azzopardi, David
Ebajemito, James
McEwan, Michael
Camacho, Oscar M.
Thissen, Jesse
Hardie, George
Voisine, Richard
Mullard, Gavin
Cohen, Zvi
Murphy, James
author_sort Azzopardi, David
collection PubMed
description Nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs) are intended for short-term use to help cigarette smokers to quit. Some smokers find NRTs ineffective or seek a more satisfactory source of nicotine. Tobacco-free oral nicotine pouch (NP) products have emerged as a potential reduced risk product compared with cigarettes and other tobacco products. In a randomised crossover clinical study, thirty-four healthy adult smokers were enrolled and their nicotine C(max) and AUC(0-T) determined for three 4 mg nicotine products (NP, gum, lozenge) under fasting conditions. The NP, lozenge and gum mean C(max) values were 8.5, 8.3 and 4.4 ng/mL, AUC(0-T) values were 30.6, 31.5 and 14.3 ng*h/mL, respectively. The NP showed similar nicotine bioavailability to the lozenge (p = 0.6526 (C(max)), p = 1.0000 (AUC(0-T))), and superior bioavailability to the gum (p  < 0.0001 for C(max) and AUC(0-T)). Compared with the lozenge, the NP demonstrated greater product satisfaction with a higher number of positive responses to subjective satisfaction questions. All products were judged to be well-tolerated; the incidence of minor adverse events was lower for the NP (18.2%) than the lozenge (33.3%) or gum (18.8%). In summary, NPs may provide smokers with a more satisfying alternative nicotine source as compared to the reference NRTs. Study Registry/Registered Trial No: ISRCTN/ISRCTN65708311.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9050656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90506562022-04-30 A randomised study to assess the nicotine pharmacokinetics of an oral nicotine pouch and two nicotine replacement therapy products Azzopardi, David Ebajemito, James McEwan, Michael Camacho, Oscar M. Thissen, Jesse Hardie, George Voisine, Richard Mullard, Gavin Cohen, Zvi Murphy, James Sci Rep Article Nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs) are intended for short-term use to help cigarette smokers to quit. Some smokers find NRTs ineffective or seek a more satisfactory source of nicotine. Tobacco-free oral nicotine pouch (NP) products have emerged as a potential reduced risk product compared with cigarettes and other tobacco products. In a randomised crossover clinical study, thirty-four healthy adult smokers were enrolled and their nicotine C(max) and AUC(0-T) determined for three 4 mg nicotine products (NP, gum, lozenge) under fasting conditions. The NP, lozenge and gum mean C(max) values were 8.5, 8.3 and 4.4 ng/mL, AUC(0-T) values were 30.6, 31.5 and 14.3 ng*h/mL, respectively. The NP showed similar nicotine bioavailability to the lozenge (p = 0.6526 (C(max)), p = 1.0000 (AUC(0-T))), and superior bioavailability to the gum (p  < 0.0001 for C(max) and AUC(0-T)). Compared with the lozenge, the NP demonstrated greater product satisfaction with a higher number of positive responses to subjective satisfaction questions. All products were judged to be well-tolerated; the incidence of minor adverse events was lower for the NP (18.2%) than the lozenge (33.3%) or gum (18.8%). In summary, NPs may provide smokers with a more satisfying alternative nicotine source as compared to the reference NRTs. Study Registry/Registered Trial No: ISRCTN/ISRCTN65708311. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9050656/ /pubmed/35484309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10544-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Azzopardi, David
Ebajemito, James
McEwan, Michael
Camacho, Oscar M.
Thissen, Jesse
Hardie, George
Voisine, Richard
Mullard, Gavin
Cohen, Zvi
Murphy, James
A randomised study to assess the nicotine pharmacokinetics of an oral nicotine pouch and two nicotine replacement therapy products
title A randomised study to assess the nicotine pharmacokinetics of an oral nicotine pouch and two nicotine replacement therapy products
title_full A randomised study to assess the nicotine pharmacokinetics of an oral nicotine pouch and two nicotine replacement therapy products
title_fullStr A randomised study to assess the nicotine pharmacokinetics of an oral nicotine pouch and two nicotine replacement therapy products
title_full_unstemmed A randomised study to assess the nicotine pharmacokinetics of an oral nicotine pouch and two nicotine replacement therapy products
title_short A randomised study to assess the nicotine pharmacokinetics of an oral nicotine pouch and two nicotine replacement therapy products
title_sort randomised study to assess the nicotine pharmacokinetics of an oral nicotine pouch and two nicotine replacement therapy products
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9050656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35484309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10544-x
work_keys_str_mv AT azzopardidavid arandomisedstudytoassessthenicotinepharmacokineticsofanoralnicotinepouchandtwonicotinereplacementtherapyproducts
AT ebajemitojames arandomisedstudytoassessthenicotinepharmacokineticsofanoralnicotinepouchandtwonicotinereplacementtherapyproducts
AT mcewanmichael arandomisedstudytoassessthenicotinepharmacokineticsofanoralnicotinepouchandtwonicotinereplacementtherapyproducts
AT camachooscarm arandomisedstudytoassessthenicotinepharmacokineticsofanoralnicotinepouchandtwonicotinereplacementtherapyproducts
AT thissenjesse arandomisedstudytoassessthenicotinepharmacokineticsofanoralnicotinepouchandtwonicotinereplacementtherapyproducts
AT hardiegeorge arandomisedstudytoassessthenicotinepharmacokineticsofanoralnicotinepouchandtwonicotinereplacementtherapyproducts
AT voisinerichard arandomisedstudytoassessthenicotinepharmacokineticsofanoralnicotinepouchandtwonicotinereplacementtherapyproducts
AT mullardgavin arandomisedstudytoassessthenicotinepharmacokineticsofanoralnicotinepouchandtwonicotinereplacementtherapyproducts
AT cohenzvi arandomisedstudytoassessthenicotinepharmacokineticsofanoralnicotinepouchandtwonicotinereplacementtherapyproducts
AT murphyjames arandomisedstudytoassessthenicotinepharmacokineticsofanoralnicotinepouchandtwonicotinereplacementtherapyproducts
AT azzopardidavid randomisedstudytoassessthenicotinepharmacokineticsofanoralnicotinepouchandtwonicotinereplacementtherapyproducts
AT ebajemitojames randomisedstudytoassessthenicotinepharmacokineticsofanoralnicotinepouchandtwonicotinereplacementtherapyproducts
AT mcewanmichael randomisedstudytoassessthenicotinepharmacokineticsofanoralnicotinepouchandtwonicotinereplacementtherapyproducts
AT camachooscarm randomisedstudytoassessthenicotinepharmacokineticsofanoralnicotinepouchandtwonicotinereplacementtherapyproducts
AT thissenjesse randomisedstudytoassessthenicotinepharmacokineticsofanoralnicotinepouchandtwonicotinereplacementtherapyproducts
AT hardiegeorge randomisedstudytoassessthenicotinepharmacokineticsofanoralnicotinepouchandtwonicotinereplacementtherapyproducts
AT voisinerichard randomisedstudytoassessthenicotinepharmacokineticsofanoralnicotinepouchandtwonicotinereplacementtherapyproducts
AT mullardgavin randomisedstudytoassessthenicotinepharmacokineticsofanoralnicotinepouchandtwonicotinereplacementtherapyproducts
AT cohenzvi randomisedstudytoassessthenicotinepharmacokineticsofanoralnicotinepouchandtwonicotinereplacementtherapyproducts
AT murphyjames randomisedstudytoassessthenicotinepharmacokineticsofanoralnicotinepouchandtwonicotinereplacementtherapyproducts