Cargando…
Mycelium chemistry differs markedly between ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
The chemical quality of soil carbon (C) inputs is a major factor controlling litter decomposition and soil C dynamics. Mycorrhizal fungi constitute one of the dominant pools of soil microbial C, while their litter quality (chemical proxies of litter decomposability) is understood poorly, leading to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9050698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35484190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03341-9 |
_version_ | 1784696426748444672 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Weilin van Bodegom, Peter M. Declerck, Stéphane Heinonsalo, Jussi Cosme, Marco Viskari, Toni Liski, Jari Soudzilovskaia, Nadejda A. |
author_facet | Huang, Weilin van Bodegom, Peter M. Declerck, Stéphane Heinonsalo, Jussi Cosme, Marco Viskari, Toni Liski, Jari Soudzilovskaia, Nadejda A. |
author_sort | Huang, Weilin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The chemical quality of soil carbon (C) inputs is a major factor controlling litter decomposition and soil C dynamics. Mycorrhizal fungi constitute one of the dominant pools of soil microbial C, while their litter quality (chemical proxies of litter decomposability) is understood poorly, leading to major uncertainties in estimating soil C dynamics. We examined litter decomposability of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungal species using samples obtained from in vitro cultivation. We showed that the chemical composition of AM and EM fungal mycelium differs significantly: EM fungi have higher concentrations of labile (water-soluble, ethanol-soluble) and recalcitrant (non-extractable) chemical components, while AM fungi have higher concentrations of acid-hydrolysable components. Our results imply that differences in decomposability traits among mycorrhizal fungal guilds represent a critically important driver of the soil C cycle, which could be as vital as is recognized for differences among aboveground plant litter. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9050698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90506982022-04-30 Mycelium chemistry differs markedly between ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Huang, Weilin van Bodegom, Peter M. Declerck, Stéphane Heinonsalo, Jussi Cosme, Marco Viskari, Toni Liski, Jari Soudzilovskaia, Nadejda A. Commun Biol Article The chemical quality of soil carbon (C) inputs is a major factor controlling litter decomposition and soil C dynamics. Mycorrhizal fungi constitute one of the dominant pools of soil microbial C, while their litter quality (chemical proxies of litter decomposability) is understood poorly, leading to major uncertainties in estimating soil C dynamics. We examined litter decomposability of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungal species using samples obtained from in vitro cultivation. We showed that the chemical composition of AM and EM fungal mycelium differs significantly: EM fungi have higher concentrations of labile (water-soluble, ethanol-soluble) and recalcitrant (non-extractable) chemical components, while AM fungi have higher concentrations of acid-hydrolysable components. Our results imply that differences in decomposability traits among mycorrhizal fungal guilds represent a critically important driver of the soil C cycle, which could be as vital as is recognized for differences among aboveground plant litter. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9050698/ /pubmed/35484190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03341-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Huang, Weilin van Bodegom, Peter M. Declerck, Stéphane Heinonsalo, Jussi Cosme, Marco Viskari, Toni Liski, Jari Soudzilovskaia, Nadejda A. Mycelium chemistry differs markedly between ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi |
title | Mycelium chemistry differs markedly between ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi |
title_full | Mycelium chemistry differs markedly between ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi |
title_fullStr | Mycelium chemistry differs markedly between ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi |
title_full_unstemmed | Mycelium chemistry differs markedly between ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi |
title_short | Mycelium chemistry differs markedly between ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi |
title_sort | mycelium chemistry differs markedly between ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9050698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35484190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03341-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangweilin myceliumchemistrydiffersmarkedlybetweenectomycorrhizalandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi AT vanbodegompeterm myceliumchemistrydiffersmarkedlybetweenectomycorrhizalandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi AT declerckstephane myceliumchemistrydiffersmarkedlybetweenectomycorrhizalandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi AT heinonsalojussi myceliumchemistrydiffersmarkedlybetweenectomycorrhizalandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi AT cosmemarco myceliumchemistrydiffersmarkedlybetweenectomycorrhizalandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi AT viskaritoni myceliumchemistrydiffersmarkedlybetweenectomycorrhizalandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi AT liskijari myceliumchemistrydiffersmarkedlybetweenectomycorrhizalandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi AT soudzilovskaianadejdaa myceliumchemistrydiffersmarkedlybetweenectomycorrhizalandarbuscularmycorrhizalfungi |