Cargando…
Deep learning–based velocity antialiasing of 4D‐flow MRI
PURPOSE: To develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for the robust and fast correction of velocity aliasing in 4D‐flow MRI. METHODS: This study included 667 adult subjects with aortic 4D‐flow MRI data with existing velocity aliasing (n = 362) and no velocity aliasing (n = 305). Additionally, 10...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9050855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35381116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29205 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: To develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for the robust and fast correction of velocity aliasing in 4D‐flow MRI. METHODS: This study included 667 adult subjects with aortic 4D‐flow MRI data with existing velocity aliasing (n = 362) and no velocity aliasing (n = 305). Additionally, 10 controls received back‐to‐back 4D‐flow scans with systemically varied velocity‐encoding sensitivity (vencs) at 60, 100, and 175 cm/s. The no‐aliasing data sets were used to simulate velocity aliasing by reducing the venc to 40%–70% of the original, alongside a ground truth locating all aliased voxels (153 training, 152 testing). The 152 simulated and 362 existing aliasing data sets were used for testing and compared with a conventional velocity antialiasing algorithm. Dice scores were calculated to quantify CNN performance. For controls, the venc 175‐cm/s scans were used as the ground truth and compared with the CNN‐corrected venc 60 and 100 cm/s data sets RESULTS: The CNN required 176 ± 30 s to perform compared with 162 ± 14 s for the conventional algorithm. The CNN showed excellent performance for the simulated data compared with the conventional algorithm (median range of Dice scores CNN: [0.89–0.99], conventional algorithm: [0.84–0.94], p < 0.001, across all simulated vencs) and detected more aliased voxels in existing velocity aliasing data sets (median detected CNN: 159 voxels [31–605], conventional algorithm: 65 [7–417], p < 0.001). For controls, the CNN showed Dice scores of 0.98 [0.95–0.99] and 0.96 [0.87–0.99] for venc = 60 cm/s and 100 cm/s, respectively, while flow comparisons showed moderate‐excellent agreement. CONCLUSION: Deep learning enabled fast and robust velocity anti‐aliasing in 4D‐flow MRI. |
---|